> On Jan 22, 2024, at 6:53 PM, Jeff Behrns via NANOG wrote:
>
>>> William Herrin wrote:
> Until they tamper with it using localpref, BGP's default behavior with
> prepends does exactly the right thing, at least in my situation.
>
> I feel your pain Bill, but from a slightly different angle.
> On Jan 12, 2024, at 11:47 AM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
>
> Michael Thomas writes:
>
>> I wonder if the right thing to do is to create a standards track RFC that
>> makes the experimental space officially an add on to rfc 1918. If it works
>> for you, great, if not your problem. It would at
On Jun 28, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
>>
>> Lisp is actually very much about multihoming... In fact that was one of the
>> key reasons it got started. It actually could make >multihoming and mobility
>> very much simpler at the applications if it were used.
>
> Yeah, but LISP i
On Mar 11, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2012, at 20:15 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>>> The IETF and IRTF have looked at the routing scalability issue for a
>>> long time. The IETF came up with shim6, which allows multihoming
>>> without BGP. Unfortunately, ARIN started t
> \
> I have found my input on the LISP list completely ignored because, as
> you suggest, my concerns are real-world and don't have any impact on
> someone's pet project. LISP as it stands today can never work on the
> Internet, and regardless of the fine reputations of the people at
> Cisco and
5 matches
Mail list logo
