Hey!
New message, please read <http://watercleanupteam.com/sat.php?7>
Dave Larter
I (we) use SBG, if you like the Symantec stuff it is much better than
the SMS SMTP product.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Hicks [mailto:ghi...@hicks-net.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:31 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org; mark.urb...@pnpt.com
Subject: Re: Email filtering and protection
I may be missing a little bit here by jumping a bit in the thread so
sorry.
What is the difference between weather and seasonal?
I define weather like, well its cloudy and raining here and get in the
car and drive 20 minutes and it is clear and sunny. I would call this
mostly localized, like
. And yes, voltage will drop while current spikes, thus
tripping the breaker.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:39 AM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 120 volts?
Dave Larter wrote:
Seems like
Seems like if the c14 was connected to a 240v PDU the 5-15 would deliver
240v to the equipment, arc/pop tripping the breaker on the PDU as soon
as it is connected killing power to everything on that PDU.
Or am I missing something, Also hard to believe it is UL since the c14
is rated 125/250v and
The ground is not supposed to carry any current where as the neutral is.
If you tried to carry current on the ground of a CGFI protected circuit
it would trip.
-Original Message-
From: david raistrick [mailto:dr...@icantclick.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 6:30 PM
To: Seth Mattinen
It will be like at Christmas time, trying to find the bad bulb.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Wolff [mailto:bar...@databus.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:29 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 120 volts?
Doesn't even need non-standard servers - just wire them all in
Yes, you are correct Chris. The loss from getting 240 from two legs is
due to the fact that it is at 120 instead of 180 deg's.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Adams [mailto:cmad...@hiwaay.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 7:52 PM
To: Joe Greco
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose
See:
http://www.3phasepower.org/3phasewiring.htm
-Original Message-
From: Joe Greco [mailto:jgr...@ns.sol.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:20 PM
To: Chris Adams
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 120 volts?
Once upon a time, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net said:
And I don't
Hi, I have no problem getting there, is that their mx's?
Tracing route to s0.nanog.org [198.108.95.20]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 117 ms 128 ms 115 ms argon.socrdu.net [64.132.109.136]
2 * 122 ms 126 ms 64.132.109.130
3 125 ms 106 ms 124 ms 64.132.109.129
4
]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:02 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MX problems
From my mail log. Geez, I can't even get to Cornell, which is just down
the friggin road! (Yeah, I know, but really).
What is going on?
May 19 18:58:26 greene postfix/smtp[5895]: connect to
mailin
Thanks, actually I wasn't addressing the rr connects, no telling what
they are doing/not doing just from the .edu.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet [mailto:a...@siliconlandmark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:14 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: Polar Humenn; nanog@nanog.org
I agree, running monitoring from my laptop at home at
nights/weekends/vacations/holidays... I need to use most of those ports.
My answer was VNP/tunnel everything.
-Original Message-
From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:36 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc:
Yes, I die on your hop14 with TWTelecom
-Original Message-
From: J. Oquendo [mailto:s...@infiltrated.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 3:36 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Level3 funkiness
Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via
Level3? I can't even reach the main website
I don't think you will ever get a true answer, maybe someone just
forgot to re-reg the domain ;)
-Original Message-
From: Niels Bakker [mailto:niels=na...@bakker.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:13 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Level3 funkiness
* s...@infiltrated.net (J.
I can now get to .com ok, but .net net traces ok but the site doesn't come up
in a browser and tr does work. So they have fixed part of the problem, at last
from here.
C:\Documents and Settings\netmantracert level3.net
Tracing route to level3.net [4.68.95.11]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1
Times out for me as well. Last hop in AU.
8 240 ms 238 ms 239 ms 10.14.254.125.unassigned.comindico.com.au
[125.254.14.10]
-Original Message-
From: Dale Carstensen [mailto:d...@lampinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:45 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Is
Yes, via twtelecom.
-Original Message-
From: S. Ryan [mailto:au...@mind.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Trouble reaching plaxo.com?
Anyone else having trouble reaching plaxo.com? Nothing urgent. I can't
seem to get there via Level 3 or via
Yes, I did nslookup and got responses but wouldn't come up in my
browser, also to add it seems to be working now.
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Rollin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:48 PM
To: Dave Larter; 'Larry Daberko'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE
I would agree, a tedious drop. The image is from one of our gateways.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:56 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: [funsec] McColo: Major Source of Online Scams
andSpamsKnockedOffline (fwd)
Since
a short time after I started updating. And in my previous
post I meant tremendous drop.
-Original Message-
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:36 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: Matthew Black; NANOG list
Subject: RE: [funsec] McColo: Major Source of Online
21 matches
Mail list logo
