Anyone else in North East Ohio seeing an outage of ATT's CO in Akron?
Local news is reporting 911 is out across multiple counties, so can't be
good.
If anyone has any information, feel free to reach out off-list.
David
On 12/29/14, 12:51 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok. But the interface to which the cablemodem is attached, in the general
single-DHCP-IP case, is a /24, is it not?
I'm on TWC. The IP address I get from them is on a /20.
104.230.32.0/20 dev eth7 proto kernel scope link src 104.230.32.x
The
Which market are you in?
Working for me in Cleveland, OH.
fw-1:/root # ping6 -I eth7 fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46
PING fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46(fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46) from
fe80::21a:8cff:fe17:6c47 eth7: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=19.2 ms
64
I've have residential twc in Cleveland. My router has an ip in the
104.139.34/24 network that isn't being advertised via bgp anymore either. I can
still trace route out from here half a dozen hops, so seems like an
edge/peering issue somewhere.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:17 AM,
Just came back up for me.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Rick Coloccia coloc...@geneseo.edu wrote:
BGPMON shows my routes falling off the net at around 5:49am.
We now sit at their mercy
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Adam Greene
http://www.apple.com/support/icloud/systemstatus/
On 11/18/12 3:12 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone having trouble with apples iMessage service? A friend and I are
in Wisconsin and Illinois respectfully and messages via iMessage are taking
up to several minutes to send. I am using a 4s
On 7/10/12 6:56 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
Hence the reason he mentioned skilled person...
Right. A skilled person knows not to commit to anything in a meeting, or
to at least validate what they think before they open their mouth.
Depends on the audience, of course.
At least in my
That's a horrible question for a non-technical HR person to pose to a
candidate - It's impossible for the candidate to ask clarifying
questions to make sure they understand what you are looking for, plus
you may have a strong candidate who gets it wrong (for whatever reason),
but if they were
Bill-
So, I'm curious, and others probably are too. What's the most popular
'wrong' answer?
:)
David
On 7/5/12 1:35 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.net wrote:
That's a horrible question for a non-technical HR person to pose
On 4/11/11 10:41 AM, Mike Walter wrote:
I find it amusing that the article says - The deal will combine two unprofitable
companies
So I guess the thinking is that two negatives make a positive?
-Mike
Since they will be saving a whole $40mm annually, profitability is
pretty much
On 4/11/11 12:24 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I seem to recall several dot-com-era CxOs spending very lavishly on
themselves, or getting their employers to give them large 'loans' that
were never paid back. Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, Bernie Ebbers, Gary
Winnick, Joe Nacchio, etc...
This is
Prefixing the octet with 0 makes it interpret it as octal, not decimal.
Pretty typical on a UNIX system.
On 11/22/2010 2:52 PM, Greg Whynott wrote:
i was pinging a host from a windows machine and made a typo which seemed
harmless. the end result was it interpreted my input differently than
On 11/11/10 8:41 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Something a NANOGer might want at home would be a good baseline.
I realize the exact product may differ depending on DSL/Cable/Cell/ISDN,
that's ok, let's get some various good solutions going here.
What is the state of the art, and who has it?
I've been
Seth Mattinen wrote:
I'd always wondered how you make a subnet available across racks with L3
rack switching. It seems that you don't.
You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even leverage
something like VPLS - Not sure of any TOR-level switches that MPLS
pseudowire a port
Raj Singh wrote:
We are actually looking at going Layer 3 all the way to the top of rack and make each rack its own /24. This provides us flexibility when doing maintenance (spanning-tree). Also, troubleshooting during outages is much easier by using common tools like ping and trace routes.
I'm
Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
I was recently looking into this (top-of-rack VPLS PE box). Doesn't seem
to be any obvious options, though the new Juniper MX80 sounds like it
can do this. It's 2 RU, and looks like it can take a DPC card or comes
in a fixed 48-port GigE variety.
The MX-series are
No, when you do a whois for 'fakebook.com' it will pull any registered
NS entries containing facebook.com anywhere in the whois db.
Digging a.gtld-servers.net is the best way to find authoritative NS for
facebook.com, not whois.
Clay Haynes wrote:
Looks like someone is messing with the
http://www.internetpulse.net/ (if you can get to it). Does not look
pretty for L3.
I can't get to most web sites if I go via Level3 (Cleveland, OH).
Ping/traceroute look good though.
marco wrote:
is anyone having issues with Level3?
It doesn't - It's just an x86 PC. I have Vyatta running inside VMware
ESX, not well, but it works ;-)
Comparing Imagestream and Vyatta to Juniper is crazy. The first two are
software based platforms (with perhaps some hardware off-load for
checksums and whatnot), where as the Juniper pretty
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Multipath, yes, but flow-based, not per packet.
There exists a patch for 2.4 kernel, but not for 2.6
Or tinker with iptables.
And last I checked, even with multiple 'nexthop' entries, it still
wasn't smart enough to drop a route if you lose an interface.
The boxes (3650s) came with Broadcom BCM5708 on-board, but I push most
of my traffic over these:
1c:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 06)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter
Flags: bus master, fast
I've been pretty happy running IBM x-series hardware using RHEL4.
Usually it's PPS rather than throughput that will kill it, so if you're
doing 250Mbit of DNS/I-mix/HTTP, you'll probably have very different
results. There are some rx-ring tweaks for the NICs that are needed, but
on the most
Jon Kibler wrote:
Not based on any standard, but here is a schema I have used many times:
snip
Where I used to work - ISP. All of the above - Yellow.
Where I work now - Enterprise. All of the above - Grey.
David
Steve Bertrand wrote:
LOL, simplicity via obscurity at its finest ;)
Colour coding works great, and it's easy to follow. Then there is that
issue that pops up where *that* cable over there will work!
90% of our movable cable patches (aka stuff that is not hard wired into
a patch panel) are
They took someone's advice, because it 503s now :)
David
I expect this means that DNS has been compromised somewhere.
I see that whois is wonky, but DNS looks right.
cr1:~# dig amazon.com @j.gtld-servers.net | grep NS
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
amazon.com. 172800 IN NS
There have been a few discussions over the last few months on Cogent -
Seems the response is mixed, depending if you're on Cogent or old PSINet
facilities. My experience has been that you get what you pay for -
They're the cheapest, that's for sure. I've not heard anything about
them in the
Mike Tancsa wrote:
They are also one of the biggest providers... Proportionally speaking,
if they had the same percentage of failures as a provider 10% of their
size, it would appear Cogent is worse as there would be more
reports. Also, in my experience, I find Cogent pretty good about
Deepak Jain wrote:
Can we all agree that while renumbering sucks, a /24 (or less) is a
pretty low-pain thing to renumber (vs. say, renumbering a /20 or
shorter prefix?) In an ideal world, you never have to renumber because
your allocations were perfect from the get-go.
Depends - If you're an
Jack Bates wrote:
I had the same issue. Add to that recursive DNS servers and the
support issues of everything that depends on them in and not in your
direct control.
Indeed. I recall Proxy ARP and a lot of NAT was involved :) At least you
can keep track of the people who didn't update their
jamie wrote:
Anyone seeing the same?
Yep. When you try to dig a domain on their NS, it refers back to the
root-servers. Nice.
cr1:~# dig cunamutual.com @198.6.1.202
; DiG 9.3.4 cunamutual.com @198.6.1.202
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode:
Depends - It doesn't help if the DNS server is dead, but the front-end
is still advertising the routes.
It came back to life for me a few moments ago (via Cogent) and it looks
like the routing did not change (there is a bunch of 10/8 stuff in the
traceroute).
Eric Spaeth wrote:
If they were
Joe Greco wrote:
For those unfamiliar, Cogent has a system where you set up an EBGP peering
with the Cogent router you're connected to, for the purposes of announcing
your routes into Cogent. However, these are typically smaller, aggregation
class routers, and do not handle full tables - so
Steve Gibbard wrote:
Maybe I just don't spend enough time around the leave the TV on all day
demographic. Is that a realistic number? Is there something bigger than
HDTV video that ATT expects people to start downloading?
I would not be surprised if many households watch more than 10hrs
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I think that is based off the all American TV going to HDD that is
supposed to happen in 2009. ( I think I read that currently only 40%
of Americans have HDD TV's and the 60% were not going to buy one until
it became too late. )
This is not accurate. In 2009 the US
Dragos Ruiu wrote:
Bet you a beer it won't happen. :)
I will let you know next February when my rabbit ears stop working :)
___
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
36 matches
Mail list logo
