Re: [External] Opengear alternatives that support 5g?

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 07:04:25AM -0700, Warren Kumari wrote: > Michel's Banana Pi BPI-R3 suggestion seems intriguing — yes, it still > suffers from the "Now I have another "machine" to manage and patch, and > people will try and install iperf / a Quake server / nmap / ruby / 17 > different

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 09:51:36AM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: > Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are > adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some > fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We > found

Re: V6 still not supported

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Jared Brown wrote: > Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > When your ISP starts charging $X/Month for legacy protocol support > > Out of interest, how would this come about? It already happens, more along the lines of "Business Class" vs. "Residential

Re: Log4j mitigation

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:38:04AM -0800, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2021, at 04:11 , Nick Hilliard wrote: ... > > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html > > > > 1. upgrade log4j to 2.15.0 and restart all java apps > > 2. start java with "-D

Re: massive facebook outage presently

On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 05:50:07PM -0400, b...@theworld.com wrote: > One might think in over six hours they could point facebook.com's DNS > somewhere else and put up a page with some info about the outage > there, that this would be a practiced firedrill. Perhaps, if they didn't decide to be

Re: Rack rails on network equipment

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:38:15PM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote: > Anyway, wasn't the Open Compute Project supposed to fix all this? > Why not just require OCP in all RFPs? https://xkcd.com/927/

Re: Rack rails on network equipment

On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:48:38PM -0700, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > We operate over 1000 switches in our data centers, and hardware failures > that require a switch swap are common enough where the speed of swap starts > to matter to some extent. We probably swap a switch or two a month. ... This

Re: Rack rails on network equipment

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:37:58AM -0700, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > We selected Dell switches in part due > to Dell using "quick rails'' (sometimes known as speed rails or toolless > rails). Hmm, I haven't had any of those on any of my Dell switches, but then again, I haven't bought in in

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:07:22PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via NANOG wrote: > Another solution that I've used on occasion is to do your own > tunnelling: find a hosting provider that can provide you a VPS with a v6 > prefix and do your own tunnelling to that. This works by virtue of being >

Re: shadowserver.org

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 07:42:11PM +0300, Nathaniel Ferguson wrote: > I thought I'd add because it seems relevant and this is a pet peeve of my own, > but with some notable exceptions-- anymore you can more or less think of a > port > scan as generally being a network diagnostic of some sort.

Re: Hulu thinks all my IP addresses are "business class", how to reach them?

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 05:05:20AM +, Mike Lewinski wrote: > Question: is anyone who is currently suffering this issue also doing 1:many > NAT? Or running a proxy server that might cause multiple clients to all > appear from the same IP address? I believe NAT might be the cause of one of >

Re: Hulu thinks all my IP addresses are "business class", how to reach them?

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:55:01AM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote: > Doug, out of curiosity, what does Hulu do once they have classified your > IP ranges as "business class"? Charge customers a different rate? Offer > different content? Refuse service? They won't let any of my customers connect,

Hulu thinks all my IP addresses are "business class", how to reach them?

I've been offering residential and business ISP services for a long time. Hulu recently blocked my customers from accessing their service, because my ARIN IP address blocks are "business class" instead of residential. I've tried to find a contact for them as I am not a customer, the

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:18:10PM -0700, David Sotnick wrote: > I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has > Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port on a > Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router. > > Which customer router would you

Re: remote serial console (IP to Serial)

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:45:30AM -0900, Royce Williams wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > > I'm surprised no one's mentioned freetserv[1] yet. I haven't used them so > > don't consider this an endorsement, but on the surface it looks to be a > >

Re: Question re session hijacking in dual stack environments w/MacOS

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 03:46:40AM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 00:46:47 -0500, Doug McIntyre said: > > > I suspect this is OSX implementing IPv6 Privacy Extensions. Where OSX > > generates a new random IPv6 address, applies it to the interface,

Re: Question re session hijacking in dual stack environments w/MacOS

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:23:59AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > On 26/Sep/15 16:34, David Hubbard wrote: > > Has anyone run into this? Our users on other platforms don't seem to > > have this issue; linux and MS desktops seem to just use v6 if it's > > available and v4 if not. > > I have been

Re: Any Verizon datacenter techs about?

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:04:09PM -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:46 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com wrote: I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a Verizon datacenter near my

Re: Cisco Routers Vulnerability

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:03:02PM -0600, Keith Medcalf wrote: It's reported by different customers in different locations so I don't think it's password compromised Have you checked? If the routers had vty access open (ssh or telnet) and the passwords were easy to guess, then it's more

Re: iOS 7 update traffic

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 02:42:12PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote: Given that the code is signed, I'm surprised that iDevices that have already upgraded the hard way don't advertise a update available service on local networks. Individual devices don't care where the updates come from, so long as

Re: VLAN Troubles

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:32:33PM +, Jonathon Exley wrote: If it's still not working, try capturing traffic from the Dell switches with Wireshark and then send traffic from the Cisco switch and also capture that. Compare the frames and check that the salient parts line up - e.g.

Re: not excactly on-topic Server Cabinet question

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:05:09PM -0600, Erik Amundson wrote: I apologize for this being off-topic in the NANOG list, but I'm hoping some of you have experience with the particulars of what I'm looking for... I am looking for a server cabinet which has an electric latching mechanism on

Re: AW: Aqua Conduit for 10G multi-mode?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:11:03AM -0700, Michael J McCafferty wrote: I want the conduit/innerduct corrugated tubing to be aqua for my aqua fibers. There is orange conduit and innerduct corrugated tubing for orange fibers, and yellow for yellow fiber. Carlon has HDPE Innerduct in any color you

Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:22:27AM -0400, Barton F Bruce wrote: So what is wrong with a /31? We use /30s but if you are short on IP space, look at using /31 rather than /30 links. Cuts your space usage in half. /31's are only defined for point-to-point links. Ethernet isn't considered PtP in

Re: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:55:44AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: Still wondering if anyone knows how the Cisco lifetime warranty really works...? You call up TAC, tell them you have a problem with your catalyst. Since the huge gray-market problem with cisco gear, they'll probably want proof that