Hey!
New message, please read <http://inhouse.onnet.edu.vn/sleep.php?297>
Durand Alain
Who said the water at the bottom of the barrel of IPv4 addresses will be
very pure? We ARE running out and the global pain is increasing.
- Alain.
On 1/21/10 6:47 PM, Bulger, Tim tim_bul...@polk.com wrote:
Having 1/8 allocated cannot be a blessing... There must be thousands of
underskilled
On 1/16/10 8:03 AM, Jim Burwell j...@jsbc.cc wrote:
Could well be the case. My idea was that you could do it either way.
You could have a DS-Lite gateway (Typical. Likely built into the cable
modem or similar device), or in the case where no gateway is available,
a DS-Lite client (basically
On 1/16/10 10:52 AM, Cam Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
A dual-stack capable host like windows 7 does not ensure any ipv6 network
access beyond the local LAN, especially given todays ipv4-only service
dominance. There are various ways to translate or tunnel to solve this problem,
connecting v6
On 1/17/10 11:59 AM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
It's unfortunate for me that nobody is interested in talking about the
question I asked in light of the data i supplied. The question being,
is it possible for a mobile operator to offer an IPv6-only service
today to casual
On 1/17/10 1:01 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
But, i am legitimately interested in perceived
service gaps or issues, given this tightly controlled service
definition (web and email).
I think the phones stopped being tightly controlled with the
iPhone and Android phones. They
I have looked at DS-lite very carefully. First, DS-Lite fits better
for cable operators since they have CPE and can have a DS-lite
function in the CPE that they control, and that in turn allows them to
provide IPv4, IPv6, and dual-stack to the end-host that they do not
control. DS-Lite
[resending with more readable, apologies for the duplicate]
DS-lite can work both for fixed and wireless scenario, where you have a
laptop/pda/smarphone/tablet
that is only configured by the access network with IPv6 but want to access
IPv4 content FROM IPv4
applications. This is the main
On 12/2/09 7:24 PM, Brandon Galbraith brandon.galbra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Matthew Dodd md...@doddserver.com wrote:
I meant to say 6to4, sorry about that. Nothing special there.
-Matt
4to6 would be a mighty nice feature on a CPE =)
=== If you are
On 11/23/09 7:25 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
how to prevent new instances, both asn and ip?
The whole value of the RIR is to guarantee this uniqueness. This problem
should not have happened.
The fact that it has is troublesome. I¹ll make a guess that this is a result
of a clerical
I would suggest to read RFC3901/BCP91: ³DNS IPv6 Transport Operational
Guidelines² on this topic.
- Alain.
On 6/21/09 5:45 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
In pratice, most clients are not their own recursive resolvers.
Rui Ribeiro racribe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
An
On 5/5/09 4:38 PM, David W. Hankins david_hank...@isc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:22:04PM -0400, Paul Timmins wrote:
Sorry for the top post, but as a crazy thought here, why not throw out an
RA, and if answered, go into transparent bridge mode? Let the sophisticated
users who
12 matches
Mail list logo
