That's an inherent problem with the IRR system (and I am still a big
proponent). There is every operational benefit from entering an object. The
object augments policy. But, what is the benefit of removing an object? It
doesn't operationally benefit (size of prefix lists, etc. aside) anything.
I 100% agree with Nick. But, in dealing with Level3, you need Level3 Members
Remarks in your objects to deal with multiple registries etc. They have an ok
system that is a nightmare to pull from different datasources with them and
they've churned the ultimately responsible individual a few
While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin being entered by a
provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by
anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a
downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to their AS-SET. In
: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:51 AM
To: Eric Krichbaum
Cc: Chuck Church; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: RADB entry
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum e...@telic.us wrote:
The origin being
I just checked. It was uploaded.The database was backed up with version
10.50.1600 (SQL Server 2008R2) and this is running 10.00.5500 (SQL Server
2008) and reporting an error. I'll have to reload the server version before
I can import that db.
-Original Message-
From: Aris
Apologies for the list noise.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Krichbaum [mailto:e...@telic.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:08 PM
To: 'Aris Lambrianidis'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: AMS-IX for local loop
I just checked. It was uploaded.The database was backed up with version
That was on June 25th according to Mark Kosters. They started to answer
with both the parent and delegated objects. That hosed the way RWHOIS data
was being reported to most things as the client won't know which to send
through to the rwhois servers. Still works from an old SCO box but not from
-Original Message-
Anyone got experience with XBMC and similar linux media centre tools running
on tablet or netbook class hardware? I like the idea of using a couple of el
cheapo Android tablets with decent external speakers as music/video/TV/phone
terminals, getting content from a
I have a 12 pack of single mode run between wiring closets upstairs and
downstairs. Only one server running feeding media to my xbmc's everywhere
but quite a bit on gig. Nothing overly noisy unless you have your head in
the closets.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bellovin
9 matches
Mail list logo
