groups, shouldn’t that same
> principal apply to platforms like AWS and Twitter?
Yes, it would. This was an astonnishingly stupid move on AWS's part;
I'm prett sure their counsel was not conmsulted.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
No need for expensive proprietary hardware.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
one set of systemic problems. Now we get to
deal with the problems that come from the solution.
That's what I'm trying to do.
You know how to help. Take the Loadsharers pleadge and spread the word.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
Eric S. Raymond :
> Miles Fidelman :
> > Now, if you mean, the oldest EXTANT distribution, that WOULD be Slackware.
>
> I will revise appropriately. And ask my informants some pointed questions.
>
> This is, by tge why, an exemplar of why LBIP evaluation should be
> cr
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
her single
person or smal;l panel of expes could either.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
Chris Adams :
> Once upon a time, Eric S. Raymond said:
> > Tell it to Patrick Volkerding, who sweated to created the first Linux
> > distribution
>
> No, he didn't.
Can you be more specific? Are we possibly having some definitional issue
about what constitutes
loadsharers page and FAQ, with the
same toolchain for making the HTML.
Which is, in case anyone didn't recognize it, asciidoc. With a Gitlab
CI job rendering to GitLab pages and a custom domain.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
Mehmet Akcin :
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 08:41 Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > The members of this list are, I think, much more aware tham most that
> > a lot of critical Internet software is maintained by unfunded
> > volunteers, and of the systemic risks that result from t
that Matt Harris had the same thought.
There is no one list, by design. That would be a single point of failure.
Each adviser keeps his or her own list. Loadsharers choose which
advisers to pay attention to.
Didn't anyone actually read the webpage?
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
at point, when you fail to
compensate your people adequately, you lose them. They bail out or
they burn out. Altrustic drive can postpone that reckoning, but not
prevent it.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
b, then choose experts from among their employees to
put it into Loadsharers, possibly acting as advisers to attract more
money to the things they can make a case are important.
> Hope your ankle's feeling better soon!
Thank you, it seems to be healing nicely.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
the pledge and spread
the word in technical communities where they have influence. But
beyond that, there are several members of this list who are clearly
qualified to join as advisers. We're going to need that as the
Loadsharers network scales up.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eri
actually. Unacceptable if you're doing pgysics
experiments but
an order of magitude below the expected accuracy of WAN time synchronization.
That said, my recipe *is* better. And a fun, simple, dirt-cheap build.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
k:
https://www.ntpsec.org/white-papers/stratum-1-microserver-howto/
It would be delightful to add a WWVB radio version of the build
to that document.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
from WWBV.
Anybody know of anything fitting that description that you might want
to deploy in a data center as a Stratum 1? If such a creature exists I shall
contrive to get my lunch hooks on one and write a driver for it.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
-howto/
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
wsill above my desk - they're my test fleet for NTPsec. The trees
near the outside of that window aren't a problem, and while it isn't
*guaraneed* that you have a 4-satellite lock at any ven time periods
of no tracking tend to be short.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
odulation of the subsecond part of the WWVB signal changed in 2012. If
your clock is older than that, the best it can still do is pick up the
low-precision per-second tick.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
table number of weeks later.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
re modes at once. Dunno.
One of our NTPsec devs posted the link on one of our project channels and
suggested maybe we ought to call M$ with an offer of help...
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at https://www.pa
Ronald F. Guilmette <r...@tristatelogic.com>:
>
> In message <20161030044342.ga18...@thyrsus.com>,
> "Eric S. Raymond" <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
>
> >Ronald F. Guilmette <r...@tristatelogic.com>:
> >> Two
-- we'd have several attacks a *day*.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
k this fits the profile of a PLA probing attack perfectly.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
h to join forces with us when we were trying to avoid a
fork, rather than fighting us and forcing one to happen. Your choice,
your consequences.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
in the timestamp
handling.
On past performance, there'll be about a 75% chance each that we've
pre-fixed the other new security bugs.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
ry
> code.
That is a good idea and I am officially adopting it as part of the Evil
Master Plan for World Domination. :-)
I may recruit you to help draft the RFC.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
ware
rate-limit outbound connections. Cute trick: if we unlimit any
local IP address that is a port-forwarding target, most users
will never notice because their browser sessions won't be effected.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
dors with 60-to-90-day life cycles
keep a lot of Shenzhen shops busy.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
mpare them unambiguously across timezones. Their usage
pattern is more like scientific than civil time.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
o you think that's true?
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
Bruce Simpson <b...@fastmail.net>:
> On 13/05/16 20:39, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >In 2012, nearly three years before being recruited for NTPsec, I
> >solved this problem as part of my work on GPSD. The key to this
> >solution is an obscure feature of USB, and a o
ter directly on an antenna can cause
some attenuation, but with any serious GPS engine made more recently
than 5 years ago I would be extremely surprised if that lost it
lock. The newer ones handle down to 30 feet in ocean water on robot
submarines.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
knowing you're doing so or wasting your money.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
Everything you know is wrong. But some of it is a useful first approximation.
be the big
> bugaboo in cost limiting right now.
I'll reply to this starting a separate thread.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
l be happy to answer technical and procedural questions about NTPsec.
Any questions about politics and policy should go to Mark Atwood.
See www.ntpsec.org for more information.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
l be happy to answer technical and procedural questions about NTPsec.
Any questions about politics and policy should go to Mark Atwood.
See www.ntpsec.org for more information.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there wer
38 matches
Mail list logo
