RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

Received a notification shortly after reporting the problem at 6am this morning about "issues" on the Exchange. We saw packet input on our routers in upwards of 350K pps, with all peers disabled. Looked to be a broadcast/multicast storm. Seems to be good now, but no explanation of what was

RE: Internap route optimization

TL;DR: Not worth it unless you have only a few transit providers and are a content-heavy network with little inbound traffic. We used the Internap FCP for a long time (10 or so years). In general, we were satisfied with it, but honestly, after not having it in our network for the past year and

RE: Buying IP Bandwidth Across a Peering Exchange

Plus we are planning on getting a wave to the exchange, and not having any physical routers or switches at the datacenter where the exchange/wave terminates at. Is this possible? It's been a while since I've checked the Equinix Customer Agreement and Policies documents, but I know at one time

RE: Cheap Juniper Gear for Lab

-Original Message- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:31 PM To: Mark Kamichoff Cc: jgood...@studio442.com.au; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Cheap Juniper Gear for Lab It's quite unfortunate. I'd really like for the SRX series to not be so

RE: thoughts?

-Original Message- From: Dorn Hetzel [mailto:dhet...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:11 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: thoughts? http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 Wow. A news story about the depletion of IP addresses? Shocking,

RE: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

-Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:49 PM To: Jack Carrozzo Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 plans/networks/customer ports

RE: Traffic Statistics for Yesterday

-Original Message- From: Craig Labovitz [mailto:labo...@arbor.net] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:10 AM To: Shon Elliott Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Traffic Statistics for Yesterday It was big (flash traffic roughly doubled globally at the peak), but not in the same

RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds?

-Original Message- From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 7:10 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Joel Jaeggli wrote: It's pretty trivial if know where all the construction projects on your path

RE: So I've got this 2.5gig wave, what do I do with it?

-Original Message- From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:e...@atlantech.net] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:44 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: So I've got this 2.5gig wave, what do I do with it? -Original Message- From: Kevin Hunt [mailto:kh...@huntbrothers.com] Sent: Friday

RE: Inauguration streaming traffic

-Original Message- From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:j...@west.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:21 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Inauguration streaming traffic We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right

Tier 1 vs. all. Was: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity facts

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 8:55 AM Let's put it another 'nother way. Would an end user get better connectivity by buying from a reseller of transit? In other words, buying transit from a network which also

RE: duplicate packet

-Original Message- From: chloe K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:46 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: duplicate packet Hi all When I ping the ip, I get the duplicate I check the ip is just one. Why it happens? Thank you 64 bytes from

RE: interger to I P address

-Original Message- From: kcc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:12 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: interger to I P address Hi all ls it possible t convert the interger to ip Thank you My two cents: # ping 1089055123 PING 1089055123 (64.233.169.147)

RE: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper

-Original Message- From: Paul Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 11:48 AM To: Smith, Steve B; Chris Heighway Cc: nanog Subject: RE: Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper Thanks guys so far for the responses Adtran has a 5 year warranty and support for free as

RE: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience

-Original Message- From: Paul Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:25 AM To: Drew Weaver Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience Going off this and previous posts, you'd well-served to follow the advice you sarcastically

Re: [Nanog] Routing Policy Information

-Original Message- From: Fouant, Stefan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:23 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: [Nanog] Routing Policy Information /end lurk Hi folks, Wondering if there is a good repository of information somewhere which outlines the