Thanks John. This was a common question that was asked off-list. That edge MTA
is not used and has never been used by anything/anyone other than us. No
customer mail flows or has flowed in or out via it ever.
As I mentioned in my follow-up post, the issue at this point is that the domain
has
such records.
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net
To: nanog nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:11:43 PM
Subject: Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's retarded non-spam filtering?
Erik L wrote:
Received-SPF: pass ...
Authentication-Results
Message -
From: Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:29:10 PM
Subject: Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's retarded non-spam filtering?
On 09/29/2010 12:05 AM, Erik L wrote:
Google appears to have blacklisted our domain. From
No
- Original Message -
From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:51:49 PM
Subject: Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's retarded non-spam filtering?
On 9/29/2010 11:48, Erik L wrote:
Thanks John. This was a common question
I realize that this is somewhat OT, but I'm sure that others on the list
encounter the same issues and that at least some folks might have useful
comments.
An increasingly large number of our customers are using Gmail or Google Apps
and almost all of our OSS/BSS mail is getting spam filtered
from a
non-existant host
Unlikely to be an IP repuation issue given the one message above did go through
fine.
Erik
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
To: Erik L erik_l...@caneris.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 4:44:24 PM
Subject: Re
Hi William,
I do so for our entire IP space on a regular basis. The edge MTA I mentioned in
the reply to Bill shows up as Neutral there.
Thanks
Erik
- Original Message -
From: William Pitcock neno...@systeminplace.net
To: Erik L erik_l...@caneris.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday
, 2010 05:16
To: Erik L
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Seeking Amazon EC2 abuse contact
Erik,
We have several customers being attacked from the same
EC2 instance on
their network for 2 full days now. Contacted them at
ec2-ab...@amazon.com and 25 hours later received a message
...@streamservice.nl]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 9:39 AM
To: Erik L; 'Michael J McCafferty'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Seeking Amazon EC2 abuse contact
Hello Erik,
Do you care to share the IP address? So everyone could update their
firewalls to block the attacks? Even only blocking known SIP
Could someone from Amazon EC2 please contact me off-list regarding an abuse
issue from one of their IPs? Alternatively, could someone please send me the
contact details of someone there?
E-mailing the abuse e-mail listed in WHOIS per their instructions, including
all pertinent data, results in
On my last network I named all the routers after simpsons
characters.
scaled well?
He wrote last instead of current...make your own conclusions ;)
Scenario: with the help of RADIUS, routing subnets to end users connecting via
PPP.
Discussion: pros/cons of using Framed-IP-Address+Framed-Route versus
Framed-IP-Address+Framed-IP-Netmask.
We're talking here in generic terms, so as far as the behaviour of the LNS or
access concentrator or
As for ATM... The part that totally baffles me about the use
of ATM on
xDSL lines is that I have never, ever, ever seen an xDSL line carrying
more than one ATM VC. OK, there may be someone out there who
has set up
a configuration like that just for fun, but 99.999% of all ATM'd xDSL
rfc3021 is over 9 years old, so should be no suprise that it works
well. :-)
I'm never surprised anymore by something that should work
turning out to
have some obscure quirk about it, so I figured it was worth asking. ;)
It's not a quirk, it's an implementation-specific feature ;)
I'm reaching the point where adding in a new piece of infrastructure
hardware, connecting up a new cable, and/or assigning address
space to a
client is nearly 50% documentation and 50% technical.
A common problem :)
One thing that would take a major load off would be if my MRTG system
If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity,
it's time to
start planning the upgrade.
s/80/60/
the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss
the bursts.
s/60/40/
What is this upgrade thing you all speak of? When your links become
saturated,
16 matches
Mail list logo