Re: shadowserver.org

2021-06-28 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 13:04 -0400, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote: > What is the difference between shodan.io and shadowserver.org ? At least in theory, for the former anyone that pays for the service (or employs free credit) has access to the scan data, whereas for the later, only the responsibl

Re: shadowserver.org

2021-06-28 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 23:19 -0400, Scott Aldrich wrote: > Anyone have an idea how to get HE/ShadowServer,org servers to stop > attempting to penetrate the comcast drop at my house? > > Their website claims altruism.. but my logs dont support that claim. In theory (at least), your ISP asked for it

Operational Implications of IPv6 Extension Headers (Fwd: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-08.txt)

2021-06-11 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
Hi, folks, After almost 7+ years of working on this topic, our internet-draft entitled Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers¨ ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-08 ), has been approved for publication as an IETF RFC. I beli

Re: NAT devices not translating privileged ports

2021-06-10 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
Hi, Jean, On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 08:23 -0400, Jean St-Laurent wrote: > Let's start with this example. When I click sync my clock in windows, > this happened. > > On the inside or Private side > 08:15:07.434344 IP 192.168.254.205.123 > 13.86.101.172.123: NTPv3, > Client, length 48 > 08:15:07.47368

Re: NAT devices not translating privileged ports

2021-06-10 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
Hi, Jean, On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 06:54 -0400, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote: > Hi Fernando, > > NTP sounds simple but it could be very complex when you dig deep down > and/or get lost in details. > Here are 2 things to consider: > > 1. NTP clients can query NTP servers by using SRC UDP ports >

Re: NAT devices not translating privileged ports

2021-06-10 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
Hi, Bjørn, On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 12:10 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Fernando Gont via NANOG writes: > > > What has been reported to us is that some boxes do not translate > > the > > src port if it's a privileged port. > > > > IN such scenarios, NTP imp

Re: NAT devices not translating privileged ports

2021-06-10 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
Hi, Jean, On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 08:36 -0400, Jean St-Laurent wrote: > I believe all devices will translate a privileged ports, but it won't > translate to the same number on the other side. It will translate to > an unprivileged port. Is it what you meant or really there are some > devices that wi

Re: NAT devices not translating privileged ports

2021-06-10 Thread Fernando Gont via NANOG
Hi, Blake, Thanks a lot for your comments! In-line On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 11:13 -0500, Blake Hudson wrote: > Current gen Cisco ASA firewalls have logic so that if the connection > from a private host originated from a privileged source port, the > NAT > translation to public IP also uses an