This is quite a nice write up by a colleague of mine:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/build-your-own-anycast-network-9-steps-samir-jafferali
Hey!
New message, please read <http://adelante.com/thinking.php?w>
Franck Martin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://www.autler-kfz.at/secret.php?7>
Franck Martin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ciberpresario.com/lose.php?5n>
Franck Martin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://igoasia.org/dare.php?a>
Franck Martin
Done.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Irwin, Kevin
wrote:
> Hello, if there is anyone from LinkedIn on the board, can you please
> contact me offline?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin Irwin
> Network Engineer – Core Network Engineering
> Cincinnati Bell Telephone
>
> "It has been
I think the next requirement for iOS apps: "We ran your app on an IPv6 only
network and it did not work. Your submission to the Apple store is
therefore denied."
You have dmarcian, returnpath and agari to process reports.
https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/
Will give you an idea who send aggregate reports. To state the obvious,
they will send you a report only if you send them email.
Allow 24 to 48 hours to get your first reports, if you don't get any,
On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:38 AM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a list of NIC (and other popular whois server) features (what
can be searched on) and what data they provide (and what title they
give it)?
Your best bet today is http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpwhois/
and from
On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hail NANOG!
I am looking for IPv6 security resources to add to:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ipv6/security/
These could be best current practice documents, case-studies,
lessons-learned/issues-found,
On Nov 19, 2014, at 9:14 AM, John Kristoff j...@cymru.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:58:24 -0800
Mike mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote:
I am wondering if anyone has a pointer or reference to any tools
which might help facillitate this?
I can point you to some tools and
On Oct 19, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
But to make a long story short, and my memory's perhaps a bit rusty
now, but my recollection is that shorter URL's looked nicer and there
was significant
On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
And this is why we're going to have the
always remember to lock your screen
before stepping way from your computer
tutorial at the next member's breakfast...
a - the forge was
On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Gabriel Marais gabriel.j.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nanog
I'm curious.
I have been receiving some major ssh brute-force attacks coming from random
hosts in the 116.8.0.0 - 116.11.255.255 network. I have sent a complaint to
the e-mail addresses obtained from a
So I believe, if this list was not stripping the HTML part of the emails, as it
does not add a subject tag nor a footer, then DKIM would survive the list and
all would be fine…
why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Apr 20, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Barney Wolff bar...@databus.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:01:38PM +, Franck Martin wrote:
So I believe, if this list was not stripping the HTML part of the emails, as
it does not add a subject tag nor a footer, then DKIM would survive the list
, at 16:07, Scott Howard
sc...@doc.net.aumailto:sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Franck Martin
fmar...@linkedin.commailto:fmar...@linkedin.com wrote:
why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
From the Gmail headers your email :
Authentication-Results
On Apr 20, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Franck Martin fmar...@linkedin.com wrote:
why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
From the Gmail headers your email :
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral
On Mar 26, 2014, at 11:26 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:12 PM, Robert Drake rdr...@direcpath.com wrote:
On 3/26/2014 10:16 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
and user@2001:db8::1.25 with user@192.0.2.1:25. Who had the good idea to
use : for IPv6 addresses while
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Fred Baker (fred) f...@cisco.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Cutler James R james.cut...@consultant.com
wrote:
3. Arguing about IPv6 in the context of requirements upon SMTP connections
is playing that uncomfortable game with one’s own combat
On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Robert Webb rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. It is
now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email.
Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation. I
applied for
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Octavio Alfageme palae...@palaemon.es wrote:
Hello everyone,
I work for a small service provider starting to offer MPLS services between
Europe and several african countries. At present time we own a small Cisco
network, but we are starting to need a better
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org
wrote:
On 1/14/2014 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error
or not.
---
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org wrote:
On 1/15/2014 10:14 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org
mailto:na...@bitfreak.org
wrote:
On 1/14/2014 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
Just saw this in a message
On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate bran...@burn.net wrote:
Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error or
not.
---
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
[gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com][2607:f8b0:4002:c01::1a]
said: 550-5.7.1 [2607:ff70:11::11] Our
www.maawg.org has published a sender BCP, please read it
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
If you want to block spam on IPv6, then you can start by rejecting connections
to SMTP from any IPv6 that do not have a PTR. No need to analyze the format of
the PTR.
It is in several recommendations that a sending email IP must have a PTR.
That ISPs will not do a PTR on all IPv6 but only on
Another Internet reboot?
Can we find something better?
On Jun 22, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Andre Tomt andre-na...@tomt.net wrote:
On 22. juni 2013 20:45, Andre Tomt wrote:
Seems the entire .biz tld is failing DNSSEC validation now.
All of my DNSSEC validating resolvers are tossing all domains in
On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:49 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:45:44 +0200, Andre Tomt said:
Seems the entire .biz tld is failing DNSSEC validation now.
All of my DNSSEC validating resolvers are tossing all domains in .biz.
The non-signed domains too of course because
When staying at Homestead a few years back, they would close my Internet
connection, because I was downloading movies via peer to peer. It took me
a while and escalating to a relatively competent network engineer to
figure it out: Mate, I don't have any p2p software installed, may be my
computer
In no particular order
Connect.com.fj aka tfl.com.fj
Fintel.com.fj
Vodafone.com.fj (via a 3G stick)
Digicel.com.fj (via a 2G stick, but also via a wireless backbone network)
If you want to do BGP or IPv6, good luck!
Is that for Fiji Water? ;)
These people have very good operational Internet
to you.
Otherwise, there's always VSAT, but that brings a set of other issues
with it.
Ping me offlist if you want more detail on the VSAT stuff.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Franck Martin fmar...@linkedin.com
wrote:
In no particular order
Connect.com.fj aka tfl.com.fj
Fintel.com.fj
are both providers for Southern Cross
cable. That would be your best bet if they can get lines out to you.
Otherwise, there's always VSAT, but that brings a set of other issues
with it.
Ping me offlist if you want more detail on the VSAT stuff.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Franck
On 1/5/12 8:07 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com
On 1/5/12 7:22 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Vint Cerf says no: http://j.mp/wwL9Ip
The question here is is *access to* the Internet a human right,
something
Universal Access vs Universal Service
It is important to understand the difference.
I have argued that Developing countries should only provide Universal
Access as the weight of providing Universal Service is way too expensive
and would tax too much the business community which is developing the
I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific area
desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their business the way
they would like…
This is just a data point.
Option 2) and think country wide ISP growing very fast.
On 12/9/11 10:39 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able
Report the problem on Twitter or Facebook.
It is a common issue that support staff go via a scripted process.
You can play, I'm the IT manager of a fortune 500 company, to see if they
still consider you as a luddite, but really your only option is to either
try to escalate the call (talk to
I'm using a GRE IPv4 tunnel between a cisco and linux machines
I did some packet capture, and saw that my MTU was 1418, but the cisco was
sending TCP packet with a MSS of 1380. This created a bunch of issues. When I
told the cisco box to use a MSS of 1378 everything starting to work fine.
So
Once upon a time, there was only the IETF, then NOGs came and standards
became sloppy
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/
Something is happening...
On 6/2/11 21:34 , Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Cameron Byrne wrote:
In that case can anyone explain why the number of IPv4 *only* systems is
increasing rather than decreasing:
I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and IPv6
is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like:
We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our site on
IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, you
may consider disabling IPv6.
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ipv6/general/ipv6-05.html
Will IPv6 become a permanent change on June 8, 2011?
No. World IPv6 day is a 24-hour trial period in which we will publish our
content on both the IPv4 and IPv6 servers. Yahoo! is participating in order to
help prepare our services (as
Zabbix allows to acknowledge events with a comment.
On 4/25/11 22:47 , Payam Poursaied m...@payam124.com wrote:
Hi all
May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software
and NOC log book(preferably open source) .
I want to get fresh ideas about available software in this
On 4/23/11 11:24 , Lynda shr...@deaddrop.org wrote:
On 4/22/2011 4:01 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
On 4/23/11 10:41 , Alex Brooksaskoorb+na...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martinfmar...@linkedin.com
wrote:
What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
Non
What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
May be time to get nanog mailing list DKIM aware?
On 4/22/11 13:24 , Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com wrote:
I've recently observed gmail dropping messages or not forwarding all
messages/posts from the nanog list. This is rather annoying.
On 4/23/11 10:41 , Alex Brooks askoorb+na...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martin fmar...@linkedin.com
wrote:
What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
Non existent, it's SPF only.
My point.
This is what GMail sees:
Received: from s0.nanog.org (s0
Recently, Microsoft Australia has been refused a temp allocation (like
they had every year) for one of their conferences.
On 4/15/11 9:01 , Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.com wrote:
On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million
Don't forget the use for 911 type services.
On 4/12/11 8:10 , Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20336-internet-probe-can-track-you-d
own-to-within-690-metres.html
The new method zooms in through three stages to locate a target
computer. The first stage
Also remember, you would be serving Australia only from Australia. if I'm
not mistaken, the Australia backbone is more or less volume based
cahrged...
http://www.aarnet.edu.au/services/aarnet-charging.aspx
AARNet3 charges are different for Shareholders (Members) and for Non
Shareholders
On 3/31/11 11:55 , Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
And here's a breakdown of which user agents
On 3/29/11 10:18 , Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
ipv6 out.
3) ??? Any others that I haven't thought of ???
So basically I'd love to set up some sites for ipv6.domain.com via 6to4
as a phase one, and at some
Well, you don't need to wait for .xxx you have things like
http://www.radio.co.ck/
On 3/30/11 3:25 , Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else
Or http://www.budget.co.ck/ ..
On 3/30/11 3:25 , Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
sullying the company's image.
Who
And then you can have lens effects, where the waves reflections on the
coast, focus unto a point on the coastline.
On 3/28/11 14:34 , Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:28 PM, andrew.wallace
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM,
On 3/26/11 15:36 , Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org wrote:
On 03/25/2011 11:12 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:19 52PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
One could argue that you could try something like the facebook
model (or facebook itself). I can see it coming.
- Original Message -
From: Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net
To: nanog group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 25 March, 2011 9:33:27 AM
Subject: Re: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model
On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Disclosure devalues
+1
They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Atkins st...@blighty.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March, 2011 9:56:20 AM
Subject: Re: SORBS contact?
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote:
On 03/22/2011
But do they route?
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
To: NANOG Operators' Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2011 2:24:15 AM
Subject: the largest deployment of v6 in japan
http://avexnet.or.jp/v6/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V6_%28band%29
Don't forget there is no commission for the salesperson to enable IPv6 for you,
so definitively they are not interested and you asking them to deal with the
issue, will just lower their pay at the end of the month because they could not
use this valuable time to find customers with
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March, 2011 1:41:45 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6? Why, you are the first one to ask for it!
On 2011-03-01 22:16
Yes I don't understand why we need DHCPv6, true RD did not have DNS information
to pass, but that is fixed, no?
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 4:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
On
between RD and DHCPv6, what I care, is that they should
be able to do their job correctly on their own.
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 6:08:28
You have products like a cell on wheels. A container containing a phone switch
and a mobile cell, easily installable. You place it at the center of the
disaster zone and all mobile phones start to work...
if you are worried about congestion, then only the right sims are
registered/enabled.
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc/isp/large.html
If you take the 5 top US ISPs and get them to do dual stack IPv6, that's 50
million subscribers in the US only.
I think google and others will notice some serious traffic happening.
It took a market share of 10 to 20% of Mozilla for web developers to
- Original Message -
From: Scott Helms khe...@ispalliance.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 19 February, 2011 8:07:54 AM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an
IPv6naysayer...)
On 2/18/2011 1:53 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc
- Original Message -
From: Martin Millnert milln...@gmail.com
To: Marshall Eubanks t...@americafree.tv
Cc: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 8:28:22 AM
Subject: Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Switch for Internet
On Wed,
- Original Message -
From: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca
To: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Cc: John Curran jcur...@arin.net, NANOG na...@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 12:05:16 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
On 2011-02-16, at
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
To: Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
Cc: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com, North American Network Operators
Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 2:37:02 PM
Subject: Re: Local root zone (Was NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2011 10:37:51 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
It's bad that home gateways need replacing
It's not neccessarily bad. There are a lot of older devices
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
- Original Message -
From: Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 9:43:56 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com
- Original Message -
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 10:31:42 AM
Subject: RE: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
They missed an important point.
Who
This is dual stack, my recommendation is disable IPv6 on your servers (so your
clients will still talk to them on IPv4 only), and let your client goes IPv6
first. Once you understand what is happening, get on IPv6 on your servers.
Alternatively, use someone else network to understand IPv6.
You missed the IPv6 hour at Nanog42:
http://www.civil-tongue.net/grandx/wiki/nanog42
https://wiki.tools.isoc.org/IETF71_IPv4_Outage
May be another one is needed?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com
To: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
that develop your applications and configure the servers,
get them to be familiar with it, give them a sandbox, and then when everyone
stop to run like headless chicken, plan your transition.
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog
- Original Message -
From: Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 9:09:16 AM
Subject: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
On 2011/02/09 2:44 PM, Jens Link wrote:
No, IPv6 rollout is going to be extremely expensive and will likely
put
a
Looking at the recent exchange on the list re IPv6, it seems we are in the
whose fault is it?
• Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
• Anger (why is this happening to me ?)
• Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person if ...)
• Depression (I don't care anymore)
•
I like that tool: http://bgp.he.net/AS55327
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:41:41 PM
Subject: Re: Is your ASN advertising v6 prefixes?
On 2/9/2011 8:21 PM, Fred Richards wrote:
Mine is.
Well?
- Original Message -
From: Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:57:23 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 status
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 06:35 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Looking at the recent
- Original Message -
From: Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.uk
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 8:39:09 AM
Subject: Re: External sanity checks
On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip Lavine wrote:
To all,
Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity
Any relation?
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/11/02/04/0043234/Verizon-To-Throttle-High-Bandwidth-Users
- Original Message -
From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com
To: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 4:30:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: You Tube
and who is the upstream ISP that allows the AS to propagate?
http://bgp.he.net/AS36938#_graph4
aut-num:AS37004
as-name:SUBURBAN-AS
descr: Sub-Urban Telecom
organisation: ORG-ST1-AFRINIC
org-name: Suburban Telecom
org-type: LIR
descr: LIR Xtra Small
Just make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot by telling the best route
to the end of the tunnel is via the tunnel itself...
I use it too: http://www.avonsys.com/blogpost367 but because I have no other
choice.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com
To:
You should do a rap song...
IPv6, IPv4, it is all my fault!
Internet was just an experiment
- Original Message -
From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com
To: Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 30 January, 2011 6:36:21 AM
Subject: Re: Found: Who is responsible
If I'm correct, in 2000 in Fiji, the main fiber optic cable from the national
provider to the international provider was sabotaged, cutting all
communications. Fortunately an Alcatel team was on the island (SCC
commissioning) with the right tools and could splice it back in a few hours,
• ipv6 41 IPv6 # IPv6
• ipv6-route 43 IPv6-Route # Routing Header for IPv6
• ipv6-frag 44 IPv6-Frag # Fragment Header for IPv6
• ipv6-crypt 50 IPv6-Crypt # Encryption Header for IPv6
• ipv6-auth 51 IPv6-Auth # Authentication Header for IPv6
• ipv6-icmp 58 IPv6-ICMP
What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6
firewall.
- Original Message -
From: Mirjam Kuehne m...@ripe.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject:
:13:26 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 filtering
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Ok filtering ipv6 and ipv6-icmp is understood, it is like ipv4.
Be advised, ICMPv6 is *not* like ICMP in IPv4, and knowing what can be
filtered, what to filter, and where to filter it is considerably more
In the early 90's a friend of mine got a box of 10 HP cards with all the same
MAC address.
- Original Message -
From: Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 2 January, 2011 4:33:46 PM
Subject: The tale of a single MAC
Hi there,
I encountered an interesting
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: John Levine jo...@iecc.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 5 December, 2010 2:54:43 PM
Subject: Re: How do you do rDNS for IPv6 ?
On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
When hosts self-configure their low 64
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November, 2010 12:31:47 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:36:28 +1300 (FJST
My understanding was that there was a partial power outage that lasted only a
few minutes for some systems (not the entire facility). Generators kicked in
but a few UPS did not do their job correctly.
- Original Message -
From: Ravi Pina r...@cow.org
To: Ulf Zimmermann u...@alameda.net
Yes, you need to be able to spell Hex backward ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 30 October, 2010 2:06:32 PM
Subject: IPv6 rDNS
I battled for a few hours getting IPv6 rDNS to work. The following tool
proved to
I think APNIC has a policy that defines the minimum IPv6 allocation based on
your current IPv4 allocation/usage. This would fix the problem?
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October,
(Addresses in /56)-22)
http://www.apnic.net/services/apply-for-resources/check-your-eligibility/check-ipv6
http://www.apnic.net/services/become-a-member/how-much-does-it-cost
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 11:48:58 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
It's very interesting to me that wee
Putting a sunset clause will happen but when it won't matter much. We are not
there yet.
However, I could see it also coming from a vendor as a way to get customers to
upgrade (after that date we will not support IPv4 anymore and provide patches
for IPv4).
- Original Message -
From:
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: Joel Esler joel.es...@me.com
Cc: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 21 October, 2010 10:00:25 AM
Subject: Re: ARIN recognizes Interop for return of more than 99% of 45/8
address
to IPv6 (and your customers to IPv6 if you
are an ISP).
If you do that, you will see migration to IPv6 is made much easier, and much
faster.
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) j...@probe-networks.de
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo