Video at:
http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2011/12/13/erin-schmidt-on-iran.cnn
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
On 9/26/11 2:31 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Sorry... what makes you think the problem with use of a
AS-reputation systems is
social and not technical?
IP packets are not stamped with the numbers of any of the AS they
transitted to reach your network.
The IP protocol simply does not expose AS number
We tried to outline some of the challenges of building such a system in our
NANOG52 presentation:
http://www.merit.edu/networkresearch/papers/pdf/2011/NANOG52_reputation-nanog.pdf
In particular see slide 4. where we tried to lay down what we think the
requirements are for a socially
Having run one of these in the past, when take-downs of CCs was still
semi-useful, my ethos on this is problematic, however, I am as of yet
undecided as to this one. An AS-based reputation system for all sorts of
badness:
http://bgpranking.circl.lu/
In my opinion, third-party security based
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately
worried. I figure it warrants a discussion.
I withhold comment... discuss amongst yourselves.
Best,
Gadi.
Original Message
Subject:[funsec] And Google becomes a DNS..
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:34:50 +0200
From: Imri Goldberg lorgan...@gmail.com
To: funsec fun...@linuxbox.org
Found on reddit:
On 12/5/10 5:50 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
I withhold comment... discuss amongst yourselves.
Found on reddit:
http:/
Not sure why the URL didn't go through...
http://i.imgur.com/Q5SVu.png
Enjoy.
Gadi.
On 7/25/10 8:24 PM, Tarig Yassin wrote:
I would like to issue a question here, who controls this Internet?
Vix does, who else?
:)
Gadi.
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/01/finland.broadband/index.html?hpt=T2
Interesting...
The upcoming issue will be about cyber war. Check out the front page image:
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs488.snc3/26668_410367784059_6013004059_4296972_499550_n.jpg
Gadi.
http://www.zdnet.com.au/make-zombie-code-mandatory-govt-report-339304001.htm
A government report into cybercrime has recommended that internet
service providers (ISPs) force customers to use antivirus and firewall
software or risk being disconnected.
security
Committee chair Belinda Neal
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
http://gadievron.com/
is what they have in mind.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
http://gadievron.com/
On 4/3/10 1:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
So, what are you having your up-and-coming NOC staff read?
Since I thought this was worthwhile summarising, I've dumped
it on the mail topics page in the Wiki:
.
Gadi.
-Original Message-
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:g...@linuxbox.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:51 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: [only half OT] A socio-psychological analysis of the first
internetwar (Estonia)
Hi,
In the past year I have been working in collaboration
comments appreciated. If on psychology, please do it
off-list, though.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
On 2/22/10 7:28 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2010-02-22, at 10:09, Gadi Evron wrote:
The email portability bill has just been approved by the Knesset's committee
for legislation, sending it on its way for the full legislation process of the
Israeli parliament.
While many users own a free email
, are
you able to provide with a packet dump of the DoS? Might help us
pinpoint the relevant botnet and/or bot.
As to web server botnets, you may be interested in this 2007 article
from me on the subject:
http://gadievron.com/publications/GadiEvron_VBFeb07.pdf
Good luck,
Gadi.
--
Gadi
Last week Czech researchers released information on a new worm which
exploits CPE devices (broadband routers) by means such as default
passwords, constructing a large DDoS botnet. Today this story hit
international news.
Original Czech:
The email portability bill has just been approved by the Knesset's
committee for legislation, sending it on its way for the full
legislation process of the Israeli parliament.
While many users own a free email account, many in Israel still make use
of their ISP's email service.
According to
On 2/22/10 5:17 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:21 +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
Last week Czech researchers released information on a new worm which
exploits CPE devices (broadband routers) by means such as default
passwords, constructing a large DDoS botnet. Today this story
/archive/blackhatlitalk.html
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by tech
reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an
investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you
the details of an ongoing criminal investigation that you'll
On 1/24/10 7:20 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by tech
reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an
investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you
the details
complacent with the PR
nightmare of full disclosure a decade behind them, with most
vulnerabilities now sold to them directly or indirectly by the
security industry.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
On 1/15/10 4:07 PM, Bruce Williams wrote:
As if the old threat models weren't bad enough...
The old threat models were simply not up to date.
Gadi.
Bruce
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
On 1/15/10 4:32 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
The APT is the new game. Old rules, new game.
I don't see why it's new just because suddenly people know what's going
on around them. A bit like with botnets before 2004.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http
/2009/03/german_intellig.html
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
On 1/15/10 5:23 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
The botnet concept is one of the old rules. The way the APT works and
what it is used for is the new game.
Perhaps for talking about, but it is far from new. Come on Marc.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http
On 1/15/10 10:15 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
On Jan 15, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
1. Unlike GhostNet, which showed an interesting attack but jumped to
conclusions without evidence that it was China behind them -- based on
Ethos alone I'd like to think that when Google says China did
of time.
Gadi
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
?
As to the intricate web of who they are and where their resources lie,
these are usually cases where the more you dig, the more you find -- ad
infinitum.
Me? I'd just kick them after verifying they are not victims themselves.
I hope this helps,
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog
is hosted by the ISOTF, but is governed by members.
Note: SCADA, network operations, and other related issues should be
discussed in the appropriate forums, elsewhere. This group deals with
the internet.
To subscribe:
http://isotf.org/mailman/listinfo/cii
Gadi Evron for ISOTF-CII-WG.
Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Wed Nov 18, 2009 at 07:08:31PM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
ISOTF Critical Internet Infrastructure WG is now open to public
participation.
Sorry, who is ISOTF?
I tried looking on the website, but the About ISOTF page is blank...
http://www.isotf.org/?page_value
back:
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/6a32u/please_enter_the_first_1178_digits_of_pi_wait/
As to if it's a joke... one way to find out. :)
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
ISOI 6 was hosted by the University of Texas, Dallas, and supported by
Baylor University.
http://isotf.org/isoi6.html
ISOI 7 was hosted by Websense and ESET, and supported by Facebook and
Softlayer:
http://isotf.org/isoi7.html
Gadi.
Regards
Jorge
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org
Gadi Evron wrote:
I can share personal examples of past uses relating to NANOG, which are
public:
Oh, duh! The outages mailing list is part of the ISOTF, although clearly
its own entity.
Gadi.
Jim Mercer wrote:
can anyone point me at a Kaspersky tech with a clue? maybe we can re-craft
our login url to not offend the Kaspersky suite.
Forwarding.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
Gadi Evron wrote:
Barton F Bruce wrote:
Stopping the abuse is fine, but cutting service to the point that a
family
using VOIP only for their phone service can't call 911 and several
children
burn to death could bring all sorts of undesirable regulation let
alone
Shrdlu wrote:
Clue Store wrote:
Mine's rebooted at leat 3 times a day sine the upgrade :(
What ever happened to quality control
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2152619tstart=0
At the risk of sounding too much like the cranky retiree that I am, I
would like to see
Christopher Morrow wrote:
I would also point out that Qwest does this walled-garden approach for
their customers (have been for at least 5 years now? d...@qwest could
clarify) and they've seen success with it. Aliant in .ca also has some
fairly aggressive anti-malware works installed. There are
The story is covered by PC mag:
---
... major Dutch ISPs have agreed to share information and establish a
common set of rules for responding to users infected with malware,
especially those in botnets. The agreement, called a treaty by locals,
involves 14 ISPs covering 98% of the market.
Jury Exacts $32M Penalty From ISPs For Supporting Criminal Websites
http://darkreading.com/securityservices/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml
'Landmark case' indicates that ISPs may be held liable if they know
about criminal activity on their customers' Websites and fail to act
A federal
Gadi Evron wrote:
Jury Exacts $32M Penalty From ISPs For Supporting Criminal Websites
http://darkreading.com/securityservices/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml
Corrected URL:
http://darkreading.com/securityservices/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid
jamie wrote:
FYI, This was discussed in the already-OT thread Beware : a very bad
precedent set a week ago.
Ah. I apologize. It happens.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org
mailto:g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
Gadi Evron wrote:
Jury Exacts $32M Penalty
Simon Lyall wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Gadi Evron wrote:
Beg pardon, but does this include a message to the list itself or only
to the offender?
When the thread is first moderated a message will be sent to the list ( at
least for now ).
Each message sent to a moderated thread will receive
on this.
--
Kris
on behalf of the MLC
___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com
feeling inside.
Off topic, I found it hilarious how all the tweets came back to facebook
and set statuses about twitter. :o)
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
. Don't shoot the
messenger though!
And it wasn't really NANOG that did or does much of what he describes,
but NANOG is a good enough representative name for the community of
people who do, when we our definition to network operations.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog
While this is the Gentoo advisory, it's generic enough.
Gadi.
--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.
Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
---BeginMessage---
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory
J. Oquendo wrote:
(press 3) - rerouted to an APNIC block (outsourced!):
Velcome is here to en eye esh tee dish is John
I'm having trouble with mail..
vell have you tried reboot?
vat vershun of vindows are you use?
*ducks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpmLrz_lSuE
The IT Crowd, one of
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Deepak Jaindee...@ai.net wrote:
What does it say about these providers AUP that the FTC needed to go to court
to turn them off?
I hate to re-start the atrivo/intercage/mccolo thread(s) but, often
what happens is there just arent any
Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:29, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
That's funny, given that Mailman is the source of significant amounts
of backscatter.
Mailman is neither an MTA nor a MUA. Something before or after
Mailman is backscattering.
-Jim P.
Mailing
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Simon Lyall wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Not such a great idea. A down search engine is an operational problem
whether its application or network. It makes lots of phones ring and
finger pointing at our networks. This costs us money. Same for major
This is one of them mysterious and rare cases where a non router OS
vulnerability may affect network operations.
Sometimes news finds us in mysterious yet obvious ways.
HD Moore (respected security researcher) set a status which I noticed on
my twitter:
@hdmoore reading through
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
No, let's not. To steal a line from rbush, we tried that three years
ago and it didn't work then.
Good point, but the situation is very different than what it was three
years ago. We have a moderation team, we have nanog-futures for meta
discussion, etc.
Further,
Cat Okita wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Gadi Evron wrote:
facts need to be aligned. What we are not happy with is how moderation
works.
Speak for yourself ; I'm quite sure that I'm not a part of the 'we'
you mention here.
Indeed! ;)
To be clear, we includes me and others who spoke here who
Jorge Amodio wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
Jared put together long time ago outages at outages.org seems to still be
active and receiving reports about this
kris foster wrote:
Hi everyone
I am going to preface this by saying that the MLC appreciates that
transparency is of the most importance to the community, and that we
have not lived up to this as completely as we should have.
We have recently been experimenting with thread moderation.
Fellow NANOG-ers.
I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to
what I believe is very heavy-handed moderation by the admin
Christopher Morrow wrote:
do you have a link to this thread? (I don't actually see it in my box,
so I fear I missed it for other reasons)
oops, sorry... I did get the original message + ~6 followups. I just
hadn't read them :(
The follow-ups on-list were not extremely operational, the
Joe Provo wrote:
Gadi,
Some valid points are raised. While additional discussion from
interested folks here is encouraged, suffice to say that the topic
will be on the SC call tomorrow, as we are the folks whom receive
escalation appeals of MLC actions.
Thank you Joe. I appreciate your
Joe Blanchard wrote:
Anyone have a copy of this? Would like to analyze it and understand its
propagation.
Thanks
-Joe
I'm sure someone sent you a sample by now. As to the malware itself...
I haven't personally been following conficker as I've been busy with
other issues (as much as
In this email message I'd like to discuss two subjects:
a. Phishing against ISPs.
b. Phishing in different languages against ISPs as soon as Google adds a
new translation module.
[My apologies to those who receive this email more than once. I am
approaching several different industries on this
William Allen Simpson wrote:
I've not recently seen an ISP account phish here. The last one I remember
was circa 2003. It was a dictionary attack, arriving at my was@ account
(long since rendered useless by spam volume and terminated).
However, I don't save phish/spam anymore. I used to save
This came across my RSS feed today from gizmodo:
http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/845v3/this_data_center_has_got_its_shit_together/
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:05:01 +0100
From: secur...@mandriva.com
Reply-To: xsecur...@mandriva.com
To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
Subject: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Eric Gearhart wrote:
I hate to be pedantic but is this something that should get forwarded
to NANOG? I guess the relevance is justified because a lot of network
folks run Nagios...?
As long as network operators related vulns don't start showing up every
couple of months
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Danny McPherson wrote:
On Feb 22, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Paul Wall pauldotw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
What was that story with an African routes some
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
I respectfully disagree. Network engineers have to keep up with many
tasks and preventing DoS/DDoS should be the responsibility of
everyone. I see more folks worried about spam than they are actual
security.
Because non of us wantsto spend the next two
hehe
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, neal rauhauser wrote:
Cogent drops packets.
Angry customers call. Twice.
Admin writes haiku.
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Steve Fischer wrote:
That is too funny!
He cheated by adding periods :P
-Original Message-
From: neal rauhauser [mailto:nrauhau...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:06 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cogent haiku
Cogent drops packets.
Angry customers
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, John Kristoff wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:06:34 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Say for instance one wanted to create an ethical botnet, how would
this be done in a manner that is legal, non-abusive toward other
networks, and unquestionably used for
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 5, 2009, at 1:33 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Jan 5, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
You want to 'attack' yourself, I do not see any problems. And I see lots
of possible benefits.
This can be done internally using various
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2009-01-02, at 09:04, Rodrick Brown wrote:
A team of security researchers and academics has broken a core piece
of Internet technology. They made their work public at the 25th Chaos
Communication Congress in Berlin today. The team was able to create a
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/; classtype: policy-violation;
sid:101;)
You can't really use any snort rule to detect SHA-1 certs created by a
fake authority created using the MD5 issue.
Yes, this is a serious matter, but it hardly has any
FX has given a comprehensive talk about IOS exploitation (including even TCL
scripts operators leave behind when they moved jobs to retain access).
He has shown effective and ineffective ways of detecting compromise in IOS.
Then, he has shown how reliable exploitation of IOS routers works.
Hi folks and happy new year!
I am emailing to spam about a talk about to be given at the CCC conference
(25c3). I apologize for the cross-posting.
At the 4th day of CCC (30th), there is an interesting as-of-yet no details
disclosed talk by a couple of good people.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:35:54 -0500
From: Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@canonical.com
To: ubuntu-security-annou...@lists.ubuntu.com
Cc: bugt...@securityfocus.com, full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: [USN-698-1] Nagios vulnerability
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:51:13PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
but you need to be much more specific about what you want from
medium
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:51:13PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
but you need to be much more specific about what you want from
medium and smaller isps, and what the immediate payoffs (cf. the
financial secions of the newpaper) will be to them to justify the
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
It seems that all these cases are more under the bottom than over the top.
Every couple of years there is a story about some anti virus company, data
center, or whatever running out of an old nuclear bunker/military
base/middle of no where.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Kee Hinckley wrote:
After reading this, and the (Washington Post I believe--I'm away from my
laptop right now) article on this, two things are bothering me.
The article expressed a good deal of frustration with the (lack of) speed
with which law enforcement has been
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:22:42 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [funsec] McColo: Major Source of Online Scams and Spams Knocked Offline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Via Security Fix.
[snip]
A
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:47:48 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [funsec] ICANN Terminates EstDomains' Registrar Accreditation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mr. Tsastsin,
Be advised that
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Gadi Evron wrote:
actually nobody has posted any info about this other than what you just
posted, no details/carrier/location etc.
Jared was kind enough to take the hosting load, and the list is now hosted
there.
Also, following discussions on nanog-futures I
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:07:04 -0400 (EDT)
Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:30:11 CDT, J. Oquendo said:
What about exceeding the minimum requirements for a change.
(I think
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Gadi Evron wrote:
The question is IF given that we ensure these folks really did all they
can on their own, AND only then asked for help:
Is the end of line place to ask for that help NANOG, or somewhere else?
Gadi.
[replying to self]
A good example just hit NANOG
I do believe the wireless is provided for 200 Paul and everyone hosted
there. But if gloating in an inflamatory fashion ... oh, fake email
address. What a surprise.
Gadi.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, intercage blows wrote:
* RussM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #dronebl
* RussM *pokes*
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:58:36PM -0400, Brian Raaen wrote:
Agreed... Mailman has a feature for emergency moderation of all post, created
just for flame wars like this.
chuckle I rate this one a 2 on a 10 scale of toastiness.
But I think I probably
of the Estonian economy.
Those who wish to download the document:
http://www.mod.gov.ee/?op=bodyid=518
My contact there specified she'd be happy to answer any questions. To avoid
spam of her inbox, email me for her address.
Gadi Evron.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Does anyone know what this group is really about and how it might actually
impact real networks ?
Reminds me of something Fergie said at ISOI 5 just a couple of weeks ago:
if only the records industry was interested in folks like Atrivo and RBN
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Brian Raaen wrote:
Agreed... Mailman has a feature for emergency moderation of all post, created
just for flame wars like this.
I don't think it's a flame war, just an active discussion most have
something to say about. I still think it should stop at this point but
while
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Term wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyone on this list that can give me a noc/security contact for
someone at theplanet.com
I have been getting a DDos from servers hosted with them for the past 60
hours
and they seem to have the care factor of 0
There are some good security
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Russell Mitchell wrote:
Hello Mark,
What's YOUR motivation to consistantly attack my company?
I don't know this Mark, but it seems like he is copying your strategy of
stay up last and you win as you both make little sense.
Gadi.
What's my motivation to
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, *Hobbit* wrote:
While it's good to see some community effort going toward slapping
a lid on misbehaving sources, how about a little consistency in
the bigger picture?
Consider this sort of scenario: An ISP allows its infrastructure
to emit spam and host compromised
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Just a side-note: Rensys has an interesting blog article up today on this
Atrivo/Intercage mess:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/09/internet_vigilantism_1.shtml
FYI,
I have but one comment.
There is a difference between Vigilantism as it is
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
No, but others have, and it isn't helpful towards resolving this
problem.
Ultimately, neither is forcing them off the internet. Well, in
actuality, that resolves part of the problem, but I suspect that a lot
of the affected cybercrime has moved to
http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0595.html
I think that sums up this thread.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Joe Greco wrote:
On Sep 22, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Tom Sparks (Applied Operations) wrote:
Intercage is not a big shop, there are very few people involved in
running it
I have no dog in this
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
