You might do well to contact AS701, as those are the same folks that manage
14551 (They never did get global AS rolled out)
--h
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 8:27 AM Ricardo Patara wrote:
> is there anyone from 14551 in the list that could contact me in private?
>
> i would appreciate.
>
> thanks
>
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:50 AM John Curran wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 5:01 AM, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
> wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of
> cases where Cogent has sub-allocated IP space to its customers but which
> those customers
I designed the original numbering plan, but handed it off a while back.
Taking a look into this, thanks for the heads up.
--Heather
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:58 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Anybody here from Google Fiber? When I first got it last year, my IPv6
> setup got a /56 prefix delegated.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/about/
Being presented at nanog nowish:
Architecting Robust BGP Routing Policies
Lightning Talk: BGP Transport Security - Do You Care?
Lightning Talk: Legal Barriers to Securing the Routing Architecture
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
4 matches
Mail list logo
