an
address out of the 2600:380:46ae::/38 space which is allocated to ATT
Mobility.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS
to remedy the situation.
At this point, the OP may be at risk to his customers as well so it
would be really in his best interest to pursue this as far as possible
which may include legal action.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network
://www.amherst.com/amherst-email-disclaimer/ for
important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation
On 09/07/13 20:28, Erik Levinson wrote:
For those who have gone through such events in the past, what can one
expect in terms of long-term impact...should we expect some premature
component failures? Does anyone have any stats to share?
While others have already talked about what to look out
.
http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
your ping packets to get
classed and policed into an ever depleting buffer pool.
I wonder what would happen to the pattern if you reset the interface. |8^)
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers
provider really *was* in control -- rather
than trying to placate the caller.
I don' know of any but that's a great idea. Sorta like a UID light on
a server...
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers
with an additional VGA input. Of
course there are also VGA-HDMI converters. Anyone wanna ring up
Motorola to see if they're interesting in adapting the Atrix laptop-dock
technology?
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers
then you cut
power to the remote switch and all the associated end-station lose local
network connectivity as well.
Of course you can always resort to manually plugging in the remote
switches. Can those GS108T-200 perform auto-cutover to AC power? That
would be ideal.
--
/*=[ Jake
in her office
was unreachable.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
full backups. Current retention schema is 4 weeks
of backups with a one week offsite physical rotation (performed monthly
to a safety deposit box). I'm at the moment trying to figure out a good
way for doing streaming backups to an offsite DC.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net
]
|
V
[USB2]
Nothing's perfect. There's still risk but there's some amount of
assurance.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth
briefed on it and should
be familiar enough with deployment status to be able to talk
intelligently and honestly with a potential customer.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective
services and a
selective one where some of the infrastructure is left intact but under
tighter control... especially if internal reach is still selectively
available while external reach has been disabled.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber
point to a coordinated intentional blackout by the
Egyptian gov't though.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
,
multimedia radio and comms), it is likely that the system interconnect
is handled over Media Oriented System Transport (MOST) which is a
variation on traditional token-ring.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers
workforce
are little more than power users (if that) when it comes to operating
systems.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
UPSes are APC brand. A
SmartUPS 500 w/Web/SNMP card will run you about $350 to $400 and you
poll them for input voltage and frequency. Here's a snapshot from a
couple of years ago... I do have dirty power.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/226/464847907_c3038c21e4_o.png
--
/*=[ Jake
saying that a Juniper is just FreeBSD with a bunch of
scripts and a weird CLI.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?
Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 20:22 +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to CRS-2? :)
It exploded and was destroyed during construction. Parts of it were
also recycled to build the next CRS. |8^)
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?
Because in some organisations, the only
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:45 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 17:31, Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010
the
bar rather than suddenly springing an Olympic level high-jump upon them.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
+==*/
at the time and not all that
accurate nor of course was it expedient. We attempted to automate that
part without too much success.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 23:03 -0800, Jake Khuon wrote:
The best solution we came up with at the time was to add some control
knobs to rsd in order to allow us to quickly take down the BGP session
to the peer on the falsely advertising RS.
Sorry... this was poorly worded. We did not actually
to this video, you could make another one that
explains some of the history of the IXP, how diverse they can be and how
they are evolving to meet the demands of the next generation of content
distribution and the distributed shared computing resources.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:55 +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jake Khuon wrote:
Excellent production.
... but still an advertisement for use of IXPs instead of private peering
or alike. I'd say it contains several factual errors or at least omittance
of important
29 matches
Mail list logo
