RE: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities

l. STIR/SHAKEN implementation deadlines should have started at the core of the PSTN - transit and tandems - and moved out towards the edge. Instead it started at the edge, we all got complaint, and we still can't deliver calls because the core of the PSTN is lagging. Jason Baugher, Network Operati

RE: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities

the RBOCs and tandems. Any order from the FCC to put an end date on SS7 would need to start with forcing the RBOC's and tandems to upgrade their networks to actually support SIP. Good luck with that when your lata tandem is so old and broke they're running Rockwell 3x50's. Jason Baugher

RE: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

most big networks that do full-table-routing also use multi-core routers with lots of RAM? those would probably handle /27s and while small networks mostly use default routing, it should be reasonable to allow /25-/27? Thanks for reading, regards.. Jason Baugher, Network Operations Manage

RE: "Permanent" DST

Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- - Jason Baugher, Network Operations Manager 405 Emminga Road | PO Box 217 | Golden, IL 62339-0217 P (217) 696-4411 | F (217) 696-4811 | www.adams.net<http://www.adams.net/> [Adams-Logo]<http://ada

RE: "Permanent" DST

nfo__;!!CKZwjTOV!jlq104a9OT4LH-Gk4LCElbaWSsLXzHYDHHpxEqU0OZW56655xb8Df0mA4p1wvA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.bcp38.info__;!!CKZwjTOV!jlq104a9OT4LH-Gk4LCElbaWSsLXzHYDHHpxEqU0OZW56655xb8Df0mA4p1wvA$> > [bcp38[.]info] 2000 Land Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38:

RE: "Permanent" DST

You must not have ever dealt with Indiana, where it was DST or not by choice per county. It wasn't quite the cluster***k you'd think. Jason Baugher, Network Operations Manager 405 Emminga Road | PO Box 217 | Golden, IL 62339-0217 P (217) 696-4411 | F (217) 696-4811 | www.adams.net<http://www.adam

RE: "Permanent" DST

Cheers, > -- jra > > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com<mailto:j...@baylink.com> > Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274 Jason

Re: IP Dslams

to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. Jason Baugher, Network Operations

Re: Hurricane Maria: Summary of communication status - and lack of

The more I read about this, the more disturbed I get. On the one hand, we keep hearing that the trucks aren't moving because roads are impassable. Then I read that government officials are driving from their remote areas to San Juan to ask why no aid is coming, disputing the claims about the

Re: Moving fibre trunks: interruptions?

The the USA, we have tornadoes, hurricanes, nasty wind and lightning, ice accumulation on lines, and idiot squirrels that like to eat fiber. Buried fiber over time will end up being cheaper than aerial once you factor in maintenance and repair. Add to that the additional cost of pole studies,

DMCA processing software

I'm curious what people are using to manage DMCA takedown notices in mid-sized networks. I've been searching, and have found the ACNS spec, and a few obscure references to an RT plugin, but not much else. As the ISP I work for grows, manual handling of notices is starting to be a problem. I'd

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

Wait, is this April Fools? The way to make device manufacturers tighten up their security holes is to stick them on the public Internet? That's a hoot. On Jun 20, 2016 6:57 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote: > > In message <28657bed-e262-452d-b218-7b39b17f3...@delong.com>, Owen DeLong >

Re: 10gig pricing with Verizon crazy?

We were talking to AT once about using them for last-mile in their territories. The first pricing we got was astronomical. One we recovered from the shock and scrolled down, we saw all the 98%discount this, 95% discount that tables, which after being applied brought them into the ballpark. I seem

Re: Broadband Router Comparisons

Providing a managed service is the direction we're going. In our case, since we're a Calix shop, we're using their GigaCenters, but I'm sure there are other vendor options out there. Early indications are that 95+% of our residential customers would rather pay a nominal "maintenance" fee and use

Re: Nat

In the real world of service providers and customers, people don't "choose to be the authors". To choose, they would have to know the options. If I were to randomly poll 1000 of our residential customers to ask them about their L2/L3 networks, firewall policies, etc..., they'd have no idea what I

RE: Favorite GPON Vendor?

Too bad they require registration, don't need yet another sales person calling me. The abstract reads more or less like what Calix is promoting with their product development. On Nov 12, 2015 6:25 PM, "Scott Helms" wrote: > Frank, > > Take a look at this webinar. > >

Re: Favorite GPON Vendor?

That is the case with Calix Active Ethernet ONT's, but not with GPON. AE ONT's need a tftp server on boot to get a configuration. On Nov 11, 2015 2:00 PM, "Brian R" wrote: > Previously I had stated we tested Calix equipment. That was wrong, we had > deployed Tellabs

Re: Fw: new message

This is getting really old. On Oct 25, 2015 3:50 PM, "Philippe Baucherel" wrote: > Hey! > > > > New message, please read > > > > Philippe Baucherel > >

Re: Spamhaus contact needed

/2015 12:32, Larry Sheldon wrote: >> >>> On 10/15/2015 00:27, Jason Baugher wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry to clutter up this list with an email issue, but hopefully >>>> someone is >>>> here from Spamhaus that can contact me off-list. I have a cus

Re: Spamhaus contact needed

I managed to read through there and miss it, I'll never know. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net> wrote: > On 10/15/2015 00:27, Jason Baugher wrote: > >> Sorry to clutter up this list with an email issue, but hopefully someone >>

Spamhaus contact needed

Sorry to clutter up this list with an email issue, but hopefully someone is here from Spamhaus that can contact me off-list. I have a customer whose IP keeps getting listed in the CBL, and even after doing packet captures of everything in and out of their network, I still can't find a reason for

Re: /27 the new /24

This thread, while originally interesting and helpful, seems to have degraded to a contest to see who can be the most arrogant, condescending and insulting. Congrats. On Oct 8, 2015 6:25 PM, "James Jun" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:45:38PM -0700, Mike wrote: > > > >

Re: /27 the new /24

Are you suggesting that the Tier 1 and 2's that I connect to are not filtering out anything shorter than /24? My expectation is that they are dropping shorter than /24, just like I am. Correct me if I'm wrong, but every *NOG BGP best practices document I've read has advocated dropping all

Re: /27 the new /24

Bill, I see where I went wrong now that I went back and re-read your comment. I was conflating "longer" and "shorter". Thanks for your patience on this trying Friday. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:06 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > On Oct 2, 20

Re: /27 the new /24

My incorrect verbiage aside, what did you think about the question I asked? On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:06 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2015 12:47 PM, "Jason Baugher" <ja...@thebaughers.com> wrote: > > > > Are you suggestin

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

To bring this discussion to specifics, we've been fighting an issue where our customers are experiencing poor audio quality on SIP calls. The only carrier between our customers and the hosted VoIP provider is Level3. From multiple wiresharks, it appears that a certain percentage of UDP packets -

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

:51 PM, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: Several months ago we had an issue with a customer whose IPSEC tunnels we manage. One of the tunnels dropped, and after troubleshooting we were able to prove that only udp/500

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

over Level3. It happens quite a bit when there are no signs of TCP or ICMP packet loss. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: To bring this discussion to specifics, we've been fighting an issue where our customers are experiencing poor

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

mhop...@indigowireless.com wrote: No. But I've seen Level3 just have really bad packet loss. On Jul 30, 2015, at 22:12, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: To bring this discussion to specifics, we've been fighting an issue where our customers are experiencing poor audio quality

Re: BGPMON Alert Questions

I emailed hostmas...@indosat.com a little over an hour ago, and no response as yet. Anyone having luck making contact with Indosat themselves? On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andrew (Andy) Ashley andre...@aware.co.thwrote: Hi All, I am a network admin for Aware Corporation AS18356

Re: Level3 and ATT Latency

Yes, we are seeing the same issues, centering around Chicago. I have a ticket open with Level3, but I'm assuming they're going to tell me it's ATT's issue. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Eric Williams ewilli...@connectria.comwrote: Is anybody else seeing or having major latency between

Re: Level3 and ATT Latency

For what it's worth, Level3 finally told us they had a peering issue with ATT. They ended up re-routing traffic for the time being until they identify the issue. Of course, for some reason a peering issue doesn't warrant a Network Event on their portal... On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, David

Re: FCC Commits to Opening Up More 5GHz Airwaves

But how do we KNOW this really came from you? :) On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: Oooh. We're getting even cleverer. No, this wasn't me either. Moderators: please put my address on moderation? Cheers, -- jr 'yes, this request really came from me :-)'

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Scott, I've been down this road with Masataka. over the last few days. I gave up. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote: Scott Helms wrote: Numbers? Examples?

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote: Jason Baugher wrote: You don't have to, as you are not seriously interested in the topic. I'm shocked that you waste time trying to educate us. No, as I said, I'm not trying to educate someone who

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

You are seriously saying I should hire a translator to tell me what your document says? That is hilarious. How about you point out a reference written in a language common to North America, since this IS NANOG. Anyone here doing or know someone doing 4-1 or 8-1 splits, in a typical American

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

On Feb 9, 2013 6:14 PM, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote: Jason Baugher wrote: You are seriously saying I should hire a translator to tell me what your document says? You don't have to, as you are not seriously interested in the topic. If you say so. In your own

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote: Jay Ashworth wrote: As PON require considerably longer drop cable from a splitters to 4 or 8 subscribers, it can not be cheaper than Ethernet, unless subscriber density is very high. Oh, ghod; we're

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

In a greenfield build, cost difference for plant between PON and active will be negligible for field-based splitters, non-existent for CO-based splitters. If the company already has some fiber in the ground, then depending on where it is might drastically reduce build costs to use field-based

Re: Rollup: Small City Municipal Broadband

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote: In a message written on Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:07:34AM -0500, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: When municipality does the buildout, does it just pass homes, or does it actually connect every home ? I would argue, in a pure

Re: Rollup: Small City Municipal Broadband

with a screw that takes a security wrench. On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com The SP of choice can charge the customer for the demarc extension on installation, at which point the customer

Re: Rollup: Small City Municipal Broadband

What we've seen is that the RBOC typically has a lot of crap copper in the ground, in a lot of cases air-core (pre gel-fill) that hasn't held up well. With the popularity of DSL, they ran out of good pairs to use. As they ran out of pairs, they eventually had to put in remote terminals to handle

Re: Fwd: Rollup: Small City Municipal Broadband

On Feb 2, 2013 3:33 PM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote: .. This is not correct. DOCSIS is an MPEG stream over QAM or QPSK modulation and there is nothing about it that is compatible to any flavor of PON. In fact if you look at the various CableLabs standards you'll see DPoE (

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

On Feb 2, 2013 7:56 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: Well, I would assume the splitters have to be compatible with the OLT/ONT chosen by a prospective L1 client, no? Or is GPON GPON, which is GPON? Splitters are passive. They only split light. They care not what information the

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

I disagree. Loss is loss, regardless of where the splitter is placed in the equation. Distance x loss + splitter insertion loss = total loss for purposes of link budget calculation. The reason to push splitters towards the customer end is financial, not technical. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:29

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

I should clarify: Distance x loss/km + splitter loss. = link loss. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: I disagree. Loss is loss, regardless of where the splitter is placed in the equation. Distance x loss + splitter insertion loss = total loss

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: I should clarify: Distance x loss/km + splitter loss. = link loss. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.comwrote: I disagree. Loss is loss, regardless of where the splitter is placed in the equation

Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?

Management has asked us why we can't do RF overlay on our AE system. :) We've had to explain a few times why that would be too expensive even if it were available because of the high cost of the amps/splitters/combiners to insert 1550nm onto every AE fiber. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Frank

Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?

, Frank Bulk (iname.com) frnk...@iname.comwrote: IIRC, there is some issue with bleedover of either the forward or return (optically modulated) RF wavelength with the data wavelength. Perhaps with better lasers this could be overcome in the future. ** ** Frank ** ** *From:* Jason

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

There is much talk of how many fibers can fit in a duct, can be brought into a colo space, etc... I haven't seen much mention of how much space the termination in the colo would take, such as splice trays, bulkheads, etc... Someone earlier mentioned being able to have millions of fibers coming

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

Oh, so all the fault belongs to the financial institutions, and there is no corruption within the government agencies themselves. Right. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On 1/30/13 6:33 AM, Jason Baugher wrote: There is much talk of how many fibers can

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

with the concept of a single entity building out the infrastructure for others to lease on a wholesale basis, I just don't think that entity should be a government. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote: In a message written on Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:33:35AM -0600, Jason

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

Sorry Owen, but I live in Illinois. Government corruption is a way of life here. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: There is much talk of how many fibers can fit in a duct, can

Re: ONT diagnostics (WAS: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?)

Some in the industry are pushing the idea of reaching deeper into the customer's network to provide more value, to generate more revenue and more stickiness. Don't stop at the ONT, use something like TR-069 to manage the customer's gateway device. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, joel jaeggli

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote: In a message written on Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:27:27PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote: You're assuming there, I think, that residential customers will have mini-GBIC ports on their routers, which has not been my experience.

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

at 9:59 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com Calix is producing an Active Ethernet ONT combined with residential gateway router. I believe it also supports TR-069 for remote management. I'll check it out. Thanks

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Working in a mixed TDM and IP world, it's such a stark difference between freely available RFCs and $900 per pop Telcordia docs. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com I can't vouch

Re: ONT diagnostics (WAS: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?)

Why do you always assume we're talking about carriers, or the evil telcos, RBOC's, etc? I'm talking about small to medium-sized service providers looking to expand services to compete against the Comcast's and ATT's of the world that can practically give away Internet because they already own

Re: why haven't ethernet connectors changed?

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.comwrote: I have noticed that too. However it is not the RJ-45 connector's fault. It is the morons that insist on recessing connectors in places where you can't get your finger on the tab. I like the patch cords that have the

Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...)

We don't do content inspection. We don't really want to know what our customers are doing, and even if we did, there's not enough time in the day to spend paying attention. When we get complaints from the various copyright agencies, we warn the customer to stop. When we hit a certain number of

Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.

I can't help but wonder who would send money to same random person based on a story that may or may not be true. Were these people sucked in by Nigeria scams as well? Not only that, but the list of people who proclaimed their innocence only to be proven guilty is very long. I can't vouch for

Re: WAY OT Re: guys != gender neutral

On 9/28/2012 9:18 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com As a form of address. Hey, people is ... well, nearly abrasive. (Envision a waitron walking up to a mixed table of 10.) Sure, in that limited context. In such a circumstance, I believe

Re: RFC becomes Visio

On 9/28/2012 1:08 PM, Joe Maimon wrote: Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a customer gig circuit to them they would need a visio diagram (of what I dont know). Has anybody else seen this brain damage? Joe Regardless of all the other comments here making fun of

Re: guys != gender neutral

I think people should get the sand out of their crack (notice that both genders have a crack, wouldn't want to offend anyone) and quit looking for the bogey-man behind every door. If you constantly look for things to offend, you'll be constantly offended. On 9/27/2012 7:36 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:

Re: IPv6 Ignorance

On 9/18/2012 11:01 AM, Beeman, Davis wrote: Orbits may not be important to this calculation, but just doing some quick head math, I believe large skyscrapers could already have close to this concentration of addresses, if you reduce them down to flat earth surface area. The point here is

Re: IPv6 Ignorance

On 9/18/2012 11:47 AM, Cutler James R wrote: On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: What about network-based objects outside of our orbit? If we're talking about IPv6 in the long-term, I think we have to assume we'll have networked devices on the moon

Re: IPv6 Ignorance

On 9/18/2012 12:07 PM, Cutler James R wrote: On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: On 9/18/2012 11:47 AM, Cutler James R wrote: On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: What about network-based objects outside of our orbit

Re: Sprint Outage - Chicago

On 8/24/2012 11:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote: You mean outages@... chris, this is not productive. outages are a very apt subject for nanog. Did anyone ever give any details of the issue? We're a Chicago Sprint customer, and never saw a problem. No mention of any issues in Compass either. Jason

Re: Carrier assistance

What's with the porn lately? On 7/9/2012 3:13 PM, NIG NOG wrote: Diane spent a few more seconds over by the dresser before turning back around, condom in hand and already unwrapped.

Re: job screening question

Geez, I'd be happy to find someone with a good attitude, a solid work ethic, and the desire and aptitude to learn. :) Jason On 7/5/2012 5:18 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote: You implement a firewall on which you block all

Re: FYI Netflix is down

Seeing some reports of Pinterest and Instagram down as well. Amazon cloud services being implicated. On 6/29/2012 10:22 PM, Joe Blanchard wrote: Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded message stating they are aware of an issue, no details. -Joe

Re: FYI Netflix is down

- From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 8:42 PM To: Jason Baugher Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: FYI Netflix is down From Amazon Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (N. Virginia) (http://status.aws.amazon.com/) 8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

I appreciate the reference to bgp.he.net, I had not used that tool before. We've worked with Sprint for years, and they have always been excellent for reliability and support. We recently picked up Level3, and so far they have been very good as well. It's a small thing, maybe, but I like that

Cogent for ISP bandwidth

The emails on the Outages list reminded me to ask this question... I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last 3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider. For a regional ISP looking for GigE ports in the Chicago/St. Louis area, is

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

On 5/14/2012 7:30 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: Jason Baugherja...@thebaughers.com I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last 3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider. Really? That surprises me; people

Re: ICMP Redirects from residential customer subnets?

I've seen this with fixed wireless base radios that are bridges. We had cases where a customer radio would drop offline, so the base radio would drop the mac of the customer router from it's table. New ICMP packets coming from the network would hit the wireless base radio and be flooded out to

Looking for direct # for ATT translations

Our Central Office has been going around in circles trying to open a trouble with ATT regarding the inability to make outbound 800 number calls. Anyone have a good number we can use? Thanks

Fwd: Looking for direct # for ATT translations

I probably should have been more clear. We're an ILEC in West-Central Illinois having trouble originating 800-number calls to CIC 288 (ATT). Jason Original Message Subject:Looking for direct # for ATT translations Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:03:25 -0500 From: Jason

Re: VLAN Troubles

+1 on show interface trunk, which will probably tell you that only vlan 1 is allowed on your trunk interfaces. I find it easy to forget that a Cisco switch will not pass tagged traffic for a vlan if that vlan isn't created on the switch. Even if you do something like switchport trunk allow

Re: Fwd: VLAN Troubles

There's Heaven, where IT has an unlimited budget and management understands the reasoning you state below. And there's reality, where IT is a cost center, has to beg for every penny spent, and often times has to make do with what they have. Besides, how much fun would it be if everything was

Re: Colo Vending Machine

Better double the size of the colo to accommodate the rows upon rows of vending machines filled with all the stuff you would have brought with you if you'd planned ahead.

Re: WW: Colo Vending Machine

Do you guys ride your bike to the colo and show up in shorts and a t-shirt? Who goes to the colo without things like their laptop? On 2/17/2012 4:22 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote: On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Jay Ashworthj...@baylink.com wrote: Please post your top 3 favorite components/parts

Re: Internet mauled by bears

On 9/22/2011 9:58 AM, JC Dill wrote: On 20/09/11 7:15 AM, Jason Baugher wrote: Horses are okay, but you have to tie things to the wire so they can see it. They're too dumb to remember where it is, apparently. This has nothing to do with the horse's ability to see or remember where

Re: Internet mauled by bears

On 9/20/2011 2:37 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote: On 9/19/11 18:49 , Richard Barnes wrote: And if they turn up the voltage on the fence high enough, dinner could be cooked by the time the crew gets there! montana experience says: cows have rather thick skin, sheep come with insulation, and bison will

Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers

On 7/26/2011 12:06 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2011-07-26 16:58 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: Hi all, I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6

Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again...

On 7/13/2011 4:28 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: On (2011-07-13 14:08 -0700), Larry Stites wrote: Given what you know now, if you were 21 and just starting into networking / communications industry which areas of study or specialty would you prioritize? Again? Buy AAPL, INTC and MSFT with loan money

Re: Spam?

On 7/12/2011 10:00 AM, Randy Bush wrote: thanks for the hard work, folk. Let's work harder thanks for volunteering. when will you be flying out to the bay? randy I'm with you Randy, I'm disappointed with the complaints I see here. People don't seem to show much appreciation. Jason

Re: Address Assignment Question

On 6/20/2011 7:44 AM, Steve Richardson wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Jared Mauchja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Jun 20, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Bret Clark wrote: Personally I would charge them for the /24 too, makes users think twice about the need for a block that large. We do

Re: OT: Server Cabinet

On 5/4/2011 10:07 AM, Chaim Rieger wrote: Do you have any kids ? If yes ask them to do it, leave and come back a few hours later At last, a helpful answer! Seriously, disregarding all the helpful comments from everyone questioning your judgment in trying to move a large cabinet through a

Re: Amazon diagnosis

On 5/2/2011 4:11 PM, George Herbert wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Jeroen van Aartjer...@mompl.net wrote: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Mon, 02 May 2011 12:27:34 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said: It surprised me because I, perhaps naively, assumed IT workers in general have a rather

Re: Bubba is a 75 year old woman looking to make some extra cash

We had someone come into a cell site and strip out all the outside ground leads. Oddly enough they left the ground bars themselves, which would have been much more worthwhile. Maybe they came unprepared and only had clippers. Also, several years ago a building in our area was being renovated,

Re: HIJACKED: 159.223.0.0/16 -- WTF? Does anybody care?

On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 06:09:22PM -0500, Jason Baugher wrote: We would NEVER out the customer to the public, even if we felt the abuse was intentional. My CEO and our lawyers would blow a gasket if we were to potentially libel a customer. And this why

Re: HIJACKED: 159.223.0.0/16 -- WTF? Does anybody care?

On 4/4/2011 2:43 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:30:41 CDT, Jason Baugher said: I suppose theoretically that a ToS could be crafted that would allow the vendor to release customer information in the case of ANY suspected abuse, but do you really think that would make

Re: HIJACKED: 159.223.0.0/16 -- WTF? Does anybody care?

I may regret wading into this one Regarding posting from a Gmail account, I'm also posting from a non-work account, for two reasons. One, our company policy is to tag an annoying legal disclaimer onto every outbound message, and two, I don't want anything I say on this list to come back