Re: Tierpoint abuse contact

2020-05-27 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:29 AM David Shaw wrote: > Hi, > > I could really use some help reaching someone at Tierpoint for a spam > problem coming from 216.27.63.177, 216.27.63.154, 216.27.63.196, and other > addresses in that block. I've sent countless emails to their abuse contact > with no

Re: South Africa On Lockdown - Coronavirus - Update!

2020-03-31 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:56 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > Also, considering everyone is, pretty much, working from home, the > Internet isn't dying as it randomly does throughout a typical working > week. Human MIT (maintenance-induced trouble) continues to be the > leading cause of outages, it seems

Re: free collaborative tools for low BW and losy connections

2020-03-30 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:56 AM Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 06:30:16AM -0500, Joe Greco wrote: > > Actual text traffic has been slowly dying off for years as webforums > > have matured and become a better choice of technology for nontechnical > > end users on high speed

Re: Facebook outage

2019-04-14 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 7:33 AM Siyuan Miao wrote: > Dear community, > > It seems that Facebook network is partially down. > I wouldn't say partially. And just a month and a day since their 10+ hour record-breaking outage. Of course FB will downplay it in their eventual RFO as "some users" had

Re: Catalyst 4500 listening on TCP 6154 on all interfaces

2018-05-07 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
I saw that list, but understood the numbers there to be IDS signature numbers, rather than port numbers. Am I misreading something? On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Curtis, Bruce wrote: > Some Cisco devices use 6154 for ypxfrd. > > > 6154 ypxfrd Portmap Request (Info,

Re: Catalyst 4500 listening on TCP 6154 on all interfaces

2018-05-07 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Just a wild thought – why not open a TAC case with Cisco and ask them? On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:06 AM, frederic.jut...@sig-telecom.net < frederic.jut...@sig-telecom.net> wrote: > > - a nsa backdoor :-) > > it would be a very bad backdoor as it's really easy to see the port > listening... > > > >

US-CERT: Alert (TA18-106A) Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Targeting Network Infrastructure Devices

2018-04-17 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA18-106A

Re: Broadcast television in an IP world

2017-11-17 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jameson, Daniel < daniel.jame...@tdstelecom.com> wrote: > In the US certain channels have the *must Carry* designation. Which puts > a retransmitter in a poor negotiating position, essentially the provider > can charge whatever they want. Under must-carry a

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-05 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Yep, the notation with the slash used to be ATT's standard method. At my job (where we had some customers with ATT MIS T1 circuits) we transitioned to a web front end for our DNS that didn't allow for the slash, so we had to nudge ATT to allow us to use a dash notation instead for delegations. As

Re: YouTube streaming failures

2017-02-12 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Youtube is aware, according to a boilerplate message in their support forum: Hi there, welcome to the YouTube Help Forum! "YouTube is aware of the issue. Please stay tuned to YouTube's social media and the forums for any announcement of a fix. Thanks for reporting!" On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at

Re: YouTube streaming failures

2017-02-12 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Downdetector shows a big spike in reports for youtube in the past several hours. http://downdetector.com/status/youtube On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > verizon wired, comcast (on a mobile device) both work in IAD's area. > > On Sun, Feb

Re: ChangeIP.com has been down for 20+ hours

2016-12-14 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
See their twitter: https://twitter.com/changeipcom ChangeIP.com ‏@ChangeIPcom Dec 13 DNS Service functions restored, website, dynamic dns, and control panel functions remain offline as we continue DB restore process. On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Brian J. Dent wrote:

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

2016-09-25 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Original Message - > > From: "Jay Farrell via NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> > > > And of course on windows ipconfig /flushdns > > > > Still I had to wait for my corporate caching servers to update; I think > the > > TTL on the old A record was an ho

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

2016-09-24 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
And of course on windows ipconfig /flushdns Still I had to wait for my corporate caching servers to update; I think the TTL on the old A record was an hour. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > On Sep 24, 2016, at 9:28 PM, Justin Paine via NANOG

Re: Need abuse/postmaster contact for AT to resolve IP block

2016-08-31 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Interestingly, your mail to the nanog list went to my spam folder, rather than my nanog folder (I'm using gmail or domains for my mail.) That rarely happens. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Webhosting.net Admin wrote: > A few of our exchange IPs get blocked

Re: Regulators now regulating Internet History? Really?

2015-06-08 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
The article is nothing more or less than what you'd expect to read from the American Enterprise Institute. All regulation totally sucks is their only message ever. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Fletcher Kittredge fkitt...@gwi.net wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Larry Sheldon