1. Make your customers register routes, then filter them.
(may be time for big providers to put routing tools into
open source for the good of the community - make it
less hard?)
2. Implement the 1-hop hack to protect your BGP peering.
98% of problem solved on the Internet
On 13/08/2011, at 3:12 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
charles skipped what i see as a highly critical question, personal
backup.
my life is on a 13 macbook air, all data, mail back decades (i do not
save all mail), etc. the whole drive is encrypted, my main reason for
moving to
guys became clueful in the new tech, but as
a friend frequently says Your network, your choice.
-jim
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Jeffrey S. Young yo...@jsyoung.net
wrote:
On 12/08/2011, at 12:08 AM, CJ cjinfant...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome, I was thinking the same thing. Most
On 13/08/2011, at 10:48 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
That's interesting and if true would represent a real change. Can you
list the larger SPs in the US that use OSPF?
att
is-is in ntt, sprint, verizon, ...
randy
ATT's backbone is the old SBC backbone? Finding OSPF here
On 12/08/2011, at 12:08 AM, CJ cjinfant...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome, I was thinking the same thing. Most experience is OSPF so it only
makes sense.
That is a good tip about OSPFv3 too. I will have to look more deeply into
OSPFv3.
Thanks,
-CJ
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:34 AM, jim
On 13/08/2011, at 11:08 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
Beyond that, a nice home file server, rsynced to something in a
real data center each night. This a combo of backup plus high speed
access no matter which side of the home connection you are on. I
currently use a PC I built
On 23/06/2011, at 8:07 AM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
Be that as it may, I don't think current methods and techniques in use =
will scale well to fully replace antennas, satellite and cable to =
provide tv and radio signals.
=20
(remembering for example the recent discussion about
On 19/05/2011, at 6:01 AM, Holmes,David A dhol...@mwdh2o.com wrote:
I think this shows the need for an Internet-wide multicast implementation.
Although I can recall working on a product that delivered satellite multicast
streams (with each multicast group corresponding to individual TV
On 08/05/2011, at 4:10 PM, Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com wrote:
Many years ago I was the MCI side of the Real Broadcast Network. Real
Networks arranged to broadcast a
Rolling Stones concert. We had the ability to multicast on the Mbone and
unicast from Real Networks caches.
On 04/05/2011, at 1:54 AM, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
Multicast is an elegant solution to a dwindling problem set.
And that is fundamentally where we disagree. I see this as not
elegant at all. It is a fundamental part of the protocol suite. It
is no more elegant than
On 30/04/2011, at 5:44 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Delivering multicast to end users is fundamentally not hard. The
biggest issue seems to be with residential CPE (pretty much the same
problem as IPv6, really).
Well, more than that, since I don't really want my DSL pipe saturated
On 27/03/2011, at 6:35 PM, Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 26, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
As such, I'm sure that such a move would be vocally opposed by
the current owners of the
Multiple AS, one per region, is about extracting maximum revenue from
your client base. In 2000 we had no technical reason to do it, I can't see
a technical reason to do it today. This is a layer 8/9 issue.
jy
On 25/03/2011, at 5:42 AM, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
I have seen age old
this capability years ago the notion
of a CDN based on anycasting would be viable in a multi-provider
environment. Maybe time to revive that idea?
jy
On 25/03/2011, at 8:45 AM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Jeffrey S. Young wrote:
Multiple AS, one per
On 20/12/2010, at 12:25 AM, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/12/10 8:31 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, JC Dilljcdill.li...@gmail.com said:
Why not open up the
market for telco wiring and just see what happens? There might be 5 or
perhaps even 10 players who try to
On 20/12/2010, at 1:22 PM, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/12/10 9:19 AM, Jeffrey S. Young wrote:
Having lived through the telecom bubble (as many of us did) what makes you
believe that player 6 is going to know about the financial conditions of
players 1-5? What if player
one of the most interesting things about coming to Australia (after working in
the USA telecom industry for 20 years) was the opportunity to see such a
proposal (the NBN) put into practice. who knows if the NBN will be quite what
everyone hopes, but the premise is sound, the last mile is a
On 17/12/2010, at 1:17 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Original Message -
From: JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com
On 17/12/10 4:54 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
I do believe that video over the Internet is about to change the
cable business in a very deep and
t
On 26/09/2010, at 6:43 AM, Matthew Walster matt...@walster.org wrote:
On 25 September 2010 21:16, Rodrick Brown rodrick.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I think most people are aware that the Blizzard World of WarcCraft patcher
distributes files through Bittorrent,
snip
I once read an article
MCI and BT had a long courtship. BT left MCI standing at the altar after
neighborhoodMCI (a consumer last mile play) announced $400M in losses, twice.
WorldCom swooped in after that.
jy
On 12/08/2010, at 12:12 PM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote:
CIP went with BT (Concert) I still
N3 = new network nodes, BIPP wasn't that great a name either.
The ASN was always 3561.
jy
On 12/08/2010, at 8:20 AM, Benson Schliesser bens...@queuefull.net wrote:
On 11 Aug 10, at 2:10 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
My recollection is that Worldcom bought out MFS. UUnet was a later
Worldcom bought MFS.
Worldcom bought MCI.
Worldcom bought UUnet.
In your statement s/MCI/Worldcom/g
I don't know if UUnet was part of Worldcom when MO first made statements about
backbone growth, but I do know that internetMCI was still part of MCI and
therefore, MCI was not a part of
BIPP was sold to CW where it continued to use MCI transmission and facilities.
In November 2000, CW had rebuilt it on their own facilities (just a bit
larger). Quite soon after the completion of the new network in 2000, CW
marketing was forecasting the need for a network that was ten times
23 matches
Mail list logo
