Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded
message stating they are aware of an issue, no details.
-Joe
dropping packets. Just wondering if
anyone else is seeing the same.
Kind Regards,
-Joe Blanchard
Thanks Paul, I keep getting busy signals trying to reach them after the
Sales office and directly.
Just needed to know it wasn't something on our side.
Thanks all for the feed back.
-Joe Blanchard
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Paul M. Impellizzeri p...@bluegrass.netwrote:
We¹re
Greetings,
Just to be clear I am only looking for a scope of the issue I am seeing,
its not a direct assumption of fault or mis-configuration, more so a sanity
check if you will. Thanks much for all of the feed back, as I see it its not
just me. Thanks again
-Joe Blanchard
On Tue, Mar 22
values to
release the
block after X_amount_of_time .
I'd be curious as to what other(s) you find for this.
-Joe Blanchard
the provider(611) Any quick
links/ideas as to where to research this?
Perhaps something obvious I missing?
And yes, I tried, lmgtfy.com (:
Thanks in advance, and happy holidays/Xmas/New years to all,
-Joe Blanchard
Sorry to alll, Yes that in a nutshell woud be my question along with
tracking it,,
Thanks jay
- Joe
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Haninger ahan...@mindspring.com
To: Joe Blanchard jbfixu...@gmail.com
Cc
:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Haninger ahan...@mindspring.com
To: Joe Blanchard jbfixu...@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:28:47 AM
Subject: Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Joe Blanchard jbfixu
Simple:
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=Broadband+providers+Troy%2C+MI
(:
-Joe
On Sep 4, 2010, at 6:37 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
On 9/3/10 9:49 AM, na...@ilk.net wrote:
for a customer at
Stephenson Highway
Troy, MI 48083 USA
we seek an internet access/service provider,
on the infrastructure here this may
not be possible.
I suppose if one were to get really detailed about this, you could look
into reverse routing using MAC, but
theoretically that would/could open a whole other set of issues.
Regards,
Joe Blanchard
Jian Gu wrote:
Wouldn't simply configure source NAT
Looks like someone messed up permissions on the directories and/or files.
Even the images for the buttons don't appear to work..
http://www.radb.net/images/navbar_bottom_off_02.jpg
403 permission denied... Game over. :o
-Joe
-Original Message-
From: courtneysm...@comcast.net
My gosh, sarcasm Ok, how about we use Facebook, myspace and the other
assorted community websites/services, no better
yet lets use AOL! /sarcasm
Can we kill this thread please (for those that are still on AOL that's PLZ)
This list is for professional content, not for boasting about high
My gosh...
Ok, so if someone happens to talk about murder over the phone, is the phone
company providing the service held liable?
Lets get back to rational/informative content please.
-Joe Blanchard
-Original Message-
From: Rod Beck [mailto:rod.b...@hiberniaatlantic.com]
Sent
Yes, allow records and perhaps a phone tap, but not held liable for the
means to a crime as suggested in earlier
emails.
Again, lets get back to suitable content. We could certainly go on an on
about the legal items
but of what relevance is it to NANOG.
Kind Regards,
-Joe Blanchard
PE also reported that the problem started at 8:00 AM on the
29th and was repaired at 9:05 (no AM or PM) on the 26th (yes,
three days in the past)
Hey!?!?!? Where'd they get a time machine! lol, j/k You mean 26th at 8am
to the 29th 9:05 M-less?
regards
-Original Message-
From: Ken
Anyone have a copy of this? Would like to analyze it and understand its
propagation.
Thanks
-Joe
(TCP/UDP ports, DNS poisioning methods)
are buried doesn't help much. Perhaps I am missing something though.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Barry Raveendran Greene [mailto:bgre...@senki.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 7:48 PM
To: 'Joe Blanchard'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps
old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
Darn it
Thanks in advance
Opps my bad sorry for the static. gov/org I should have seen that.
Sorry again.
Sorry if I've missed some notes regarding this in previous threads, been off
the air for a bit.
A new twist on scamming email?
I posted an ad to offer services in my area, got a rather odd email,
obviously broken english typed, so proceeded cautiously.
Someone in a foreign country wants my to
a bit a work in front of
you. You would have to contact each of the SOAs and change them.
If your sourcing your own SOA than its simple. Contact me off
list and we can discuss the details.
Cheers,
-Joe Blanchard
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
be on with it.
Deja-vu, Wasn't there a thread about this same subject a while ago something
regarding RFC2827? Might just be me.
Just my 2¢s
Regards,
-Joe Blanchard
I am Joe Blanchard and I approve this message lol
Howdy,
Careful, this appears to not be inline with another persons thoughts. Not
mine mind you.
Anything concerning an end network is not relevant to this list.
lol
I am however, very interested in the content/replies thus far. Very
entertaining.
Ok, sorry, back to the scheduled programs.
Hughes Net DNS issue. I am 72.169.156.122. Notice the Source is port 53,
destination is 20xx.
Because I am not a large company like McDonalds this apparently cannot be
resolved.
No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol
Info
190 51.553317 72.169.156.121
with them.
I understand that the normal recourse is to Reboot the modem but in this
case I think it's a bit more than that.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance,
Again sorry for the noise
Joe Blanchard
906-384=6525
Pardon the request,
Is their anyone on the NANOG list from Hughesnet? I'm facing an
issue with reverse DNS (RFC1912) that
is difficult at best to resolve in India. ;)
Please contact me off list.
Regards,
Joe Blanchard
of this before is neither a bother nor burden, and
often
provides a nice historical response on the subject, if not a debate on the
best
practices. It certainly beats MS Technet (;
Well just my 2¢s,
Happy Easter all
-Joe Blanchard
27 matches
Mail list logo
