Here's what I always refer too
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
It's close. I don't think the testing incorporates a lot of services
in use on the routers, however.
For max interfaces, read up on this:
I did this by creating a 6to4 tunnel to a relay provided by
6in4, not 6to4. While HE do operate 6to4 relays, the brokered tunnel
service is 6in4.
A very important distinction I didn't have clear in my head. To regurgitate
some reading I just completed: both methods use v6 in v4
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all
I am trying to configure website for testing ipv6
Just wander how internet users eg: DSL users can visit this website
and any people can access this website over the world
I did this by creating a 6to4
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Rettke, Brian brian.ret...@cableone.bizwrote:
Content providers (e.g. Netflix, Hulu, YouTube) will always try to get
their content serviced for little to no cost. The low cost, web-only plan
isn't sustainable, and the amount of Netflix traffic around the globe
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.uswrote:
Is there a performance difference between the Internet and Internet2?
Should that be allowed, or must all IP networks have the same
performance?
I think that statement may confuse metrics like performance and
so you'd like to foist the problem off to the provider
(cost/configuration) and benefit? Are you willing to pay some
incrementally higher charge per month for that service? what about for
security services? Do you think there are enough folks willing to pay
for this sort of thing that it'd
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.uswrote:
Maybe the ISP's should move this choice to the consumer.
The consumer already has this option on many SOHO firewalls. No action by
ISPs is required. But this is totally irrelevant to the idea of Net
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Jessica Yu jyy...@yahoo.com wrote:
I do not know if making such distinction would alter the conclusion of your
paper. But, to me, there is a difference between one to predict the growth
of
one particular network based on the stats collected than one to predict
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.comwrote:
Yes please -option d also known as option AB
-it's the same as option b with addition of VRFs on the ASBRs
-it might as well be viewed as a natural step between opt a and opt b
-opt ab offers the same great
I think if you try to traffic-shape 80Mbps on that platform you'll have
problems. We have a 7200 with NPE-G1 (rate limited at 80Mbps) and it killed
the CPU when the threshold was hit. I imagine that traffic-shaping would do
the same to CPU and memory. I'd lab it first.
Kenny
On Thu, Jul 8,
Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's just
doing:
- BGP
- VRF's
- Many sub-interfaces and ACL's
It shipped with 02.04.02.122-33.XND2.bin
Thanks,
Kenny
do want
to
track the latest code. It's also recommended to keep a close eye on your
memory utilization and if/when any cores show up on the harddisk(s).
- Jared
On Jan 6, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Kenny Sallee wrote:
Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com wrote:
Security Gurus, et al,
I have my own idea of what a firewall is and what it does. I also
understand what statefull packet inspection is and what it does. Given
this information, and not prejudging any responses, exactly
Hello Stephane - if you search google for VRF aware IPSEC you will find
links and relevant information and configs.
I did this on older hardware by creating an IPSEC tunnel between 2 routeable
loopbacks and creating a GRE tunnel that used the loopbacks and tunnel
source and destination. Then
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Rens r...@autempspourmoi.be wrote:
All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
Maybe I should give some extra info.
All the traffic seems to pass ok via that link but I have seen that often
OSPF adjacencies go down/up , I suspect that the HELLO
Questions for the community: from a Application Service Provider
perspective - how / can one provide application access to a group of
Enterprises where the ASP provider provides ASP like applications to all
Enterprise customers who have multiple locations and who may or may not have
overlapping
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak i...@ioshints.info wrote:
This might give you some ideas (also solves the overlapping customer
address
problem):
http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/FlexExtraImplement/
Ivan
http://www.ioshints.info/about
http://blog.ioshints.info/
That looks
17 matches
Mail list logo
