Re: Telecom billing in 2020

Ms. Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE > 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC > CEO > b...@6by7.net > "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the > world.” > > FCC License KJ6FJJ > -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: Register Now for NANOG 80 Virtual!

all-presentations/> > > *Miss out on NANOG 79 Virtual?* > Our last community-wide virtual gathering may be over, but the hours of > archived talks and tutorials, keynotes and panels featured in June are just > waiting to be explored! > > View Recap <https://mailchi.mp/nanog/nanog-79-recap> -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: Don't forget RFG (was: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election)

, and by unambiguously malicious innuendo. I see > no point in getting down and rolling around in the gutter on these points, > especially not with a man whose low regard for the truth has already been > made so abundantly clear and apparent to the subscribers of this very list. > I will have nothing more to say about this, at least not in this forum. > > > Regards, > rfg -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: Don't email clients have a kill file?

m I the only > one who'd like to see more plonks and less troll feeding? > > I miss Usenet. > > > Bjørn -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

wrote: > Peace, > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 2:14 AM Elad Cohen wrote: > > A degree in economics is not needed [..] > > Which is the common thing to say by the ones who don't have it. > > I think, dixi. > > -- > Töma -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: Jenkins amplification

ess the > printer in your home office. > > In fact, a too tightly controlled VPN contributed to a 7 figure loss during > an outage at a company which name shall not be mentioned. > > Your home network should have no access to the corp network. Your company > issued laptop should. > > Thanks, > > Sabri -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16

have a standing policy of never attempting to converse with unaccountable > > anonymized role accounts. Based on past experience, this is without > > exception an utter waste of my time. -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

ters were in a > wsimpson> bathroom over the garage. > > Our first CA hub was in the janitor's closet at a now defunct computer > company. We initially had problems with the janitors unplugging the > router on weekends to plug in their floor buffers. > > Ah, the good old days. > > -- Large Hadron Collider

Prominent horse racing identities (was Re: Elad Cohen)

. Meanwhile, what has Mr. Cohen risked? And who will see to it > that he pays an appropriate price, in Israel, if I am right and he is wrong? > > > Regards, > rfg -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: FYI - Suspension of Cogent access to ARIN Whois

all queries with a notice > that explains what is happening, why it's happening, and provides > contact information for Cogent executives: preferably their *personal* > email addresses and phone numbers. > > ---rsk > -- Large Hadron Collider

Re: ServiceFinder: Ärendenummer 184863

Agreed! On 19-12-19 11 h 05, William Herrin wrote: Would you please unsubscribe your address from the nanog mailing list? On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM nanog@nanog.org mailto:i...@servicefinder.com>> wrote: __ Vänligen skriv

Re: FCC proposes $10 Million fine for spoofed robocalls

Is it legally a spoofed robo-call if I robo-call someone who has consented to be robo-called, with the caller-ID of a number that is affiliated with me but not with the telco I'm calling from? On 19-12-19 09 h 09, Andreas Ott wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Christopher Morrow

Re: Software Defined Networks

Tcl still exists, though I don't think they use it for this anymore. On 19-12-05 10 h 17, Bryan Holloway wrote: On 12/5/19 6:16 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: I tell everyone we had SDNs in the 90s. But we called it “expect scripts”. :-) -- TTFN, patrick I miss TCL ...

Re: RIPE our of IPv4

that would be a throwback, if my MTA supported full-length bangpaths. On 19-12-04 01 h 56, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 14:43, Randy Bush mailto:ra...@psg.com>> wrote: > Why does a new organisation need to have any global IPv4 addresses of > their own at all?

someone, probably someone who scraped your group, sent me a virus as a .doc file

enjoy, boys & girls https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d0737edbc17741ab9ee251586cf514552da09924920ad56aa3413334b312dacc/detection

Re: looking for hostname router identifier validation

How much did it cost? :-) On 19-04-30 08 h 38, Bryan Holloway wrote: On 4/29/19 7:21 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:16:06 -0500, Bryan Holloway said: I still see references to UUNet in some reverse PTRs. So, uh, yeah. I wonder what year we'll get to a point where less

Re: looking for hostname router identifier validation

And 666 is Nero Caesar :-) On 19-04-29 17 h 38, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Valdis Klētnieks said: I wonder what year we'll get to a point where less than half of NANOG's membership was around when UUNet was. We're probably there already. And likely coming up on when less than half

Re: looking for hostname router identifier validation

I legit guffawed. On 19-04-29 13 h 13, Eric Kuhnke wrote: I would caution against putting much faith in the validity of geolocation or site ID by reverse DNS PTR records. There are a vast number of unmaintained, ancient, stale, erroneous or wildly wrong PTR records out there. I can name at

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

I would go as far as to say that Tier 1 is a derogatory designation, but I have a beef with Cogent because they're expecting otherwise Tier 1 IPv6 ISP Hurricane Electric to bow to the altar of Cogent. On 05/20/2018 15:19, Mark Tinka wrote: On 20/May/18 09:16, Baldur Norddahl wrote: The

Re: Threads that never end

I haven't even ... This thread's going to turn into another thread that never ends. On 30/12/2017 15:39, sizone!math wrote: On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 06:42:46AM -0800, Stephen Satchell said: > On 12/29/2017 09:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > >the good thing about these long threads, which have

Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too

IPv6 space is being wasted. We know that much. No one needs more than 8 bits for site-local global addresses in the upper 64 (2/3xxx:::::/64) of the address. I'm about to propose the most harebrained idea NANOG has ever seen. I feel like supersites are getting more addresses

Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing

Missent. Welcome to IPv6, where you have technically-reserved-for-future-use space that should never actually need to be used. Quite likely, you can use something like 440::/16 as your private space, but please don't do that unless you've exhausted the true private space. You're welcome.

Re: Looking for a contact with clue at Choopa/Reliablesite network engineering

Thanks for reminding me to switch away from Vultr at my earliest opportunity. On 13/10/2017 05:56, Paul S. wrote: Hi nanog, Choopa/reliablesite is announcing our IP space, and despite repeated requests from us, they are refusing to withdraw the announcements. Can someone with clue from

Re: Protocol 17 floods from Vietnam & Mexico?

to obscure themselves from or otherwise evade some intrusion detection or firewall systems. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Large Hadron Collider <large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com <mailto:large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com>> wrote: 18:04:32.391082 IP 138-122-97-251.internet.sta

Protocol 17 floods from Vietnam & Mexico?

18:04:32.391082 IP 138-122-97-251.internet.static.ientc.mx > umbrellix.net: ip-proto-17 18:04:32.391088 IP 138-122-97-251.internet.static.ientc.mx > umbrellix.net: ip-proto-17 18:04:32.391110 IP 115.75.50.106.35180 > umbrellix.net.10454: UDP, bad length 65500 > 1464 18:04:32.391145 IP

Re: BGP Optimizers (Was: Validating possible BGP MITM attack)

Nanog's quite a nice list to spend your sick day on. ;) On 31/08/2017 19:04, Mike Hammett wrote: Sorry for now taking up 1/4 of this thread My words in the last message don't match what I was thinking, but I think you all get the point. I'm sick, maybe I should be in bed instead of on

Hacked DVRs again?! (Probably the wrong forum, but probably of interest nonetheless)

So, I run a small chat service and it has attracted abuse from multiple kinds of open device. Most recently, I've found DVRs being spammed through. This is the kind of "default password"/"open Cisco" abuse that is very hard to detect with an open proxy scanner without, well, logging in and

I'm getting these bounce messages for some bizarre reason.

Would you on the fine mailing list be able to find out what's going on here? Forwarded Message Subject:Delivery Status Notification(Failure) Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 19:01:29 GMT From: postmas...@o2email.co.uk To: large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com Your message:

Re: Carrier classification

My terminology of tiers are: Tier 1 - is in few or no major disputes, has no transit, and is able to access over three nines percent of the internet Tier 2 - as Tier 1, but has transit. Cogent is neither on v6, and I have no clue about v4. HE is probably Tier 2 on v4, and is Tier 1 on v6. On

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

i mind not one iota to store some on my computer but it won't be accessible because i don't want to publish it until i can get a dedicated server On 2016-12-22 09:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote: "If it's a politically-generated thing I'll have to deal with at an operational level, it's on topic."

Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS and/or GMX and/or both, would you please trouble yourself with contacting me off-list?

Re: NEVERMIND! (was: Seeking Google reverse DNS delegation

Engage glasses and safety squints. On 2016-11-13 07:41 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message <20161114004152.ga27...@panix.com>, Brett Frankenberger wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 03:57:19PM -0800, Christopher Morrow wrote: So... actually someone did tell arin to

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

Sorry florian. Meant to put it to list. On 2016-10-09 12:25 PM, Large Hadron Collider wrote: On 2016-10-09 04:20 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Eliot Lear: Not my end goal. My end goal is that consumers have a means to limit risk in their home environments, and service providers have

Re: IoT security, was Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network

On 2016-10-09 08:33 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote: On 10/09/2016 07:31 AM, Mel Beckman wrote: remote RF temperature sensor hub for home, the GW-1000U. ... The device accepts TCP connections on 22, 80, and 443. Theoretically I can't see why it ever needs ongoing inbound connections, so this