Hi,
Currently experiencing trouble with BGP session between 49463 and 3549.
Relevant router: cdg2.gblx.net
Can you please contact me off-list for resolution ?
Thanks
On 04/04/2014 01:51, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Brandon Ewing wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:26:58PM -0400, Michael Brown wrote:
Did you purchase SMARTnet when you bought the device? If you didn't,
you're probably SOL.
This is not true. Cisco provides a limited lif
Hi,
I bought a C3750G-12S which is now end of sale on cisco website. This
device is now defective.
Since I bought it from a reseller and not directly from cisco, cisco is
refusing to take it under warranty and tells me to have the reseller
take care of it.
The reseller doesnt wan't to hear
On 07/11/2009 18:21, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi
I am requested to get not brand list switch
how can I test it? any software or methods
eg:
reliable
speed
or any need
Thank you so much
Hi,
Can you please make sentences that make sense ?
Are you seeking for advice or help ?
I think yes. So the l
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:52:07PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It helps if you mention your own IP address. Using 2001:7a8:820:1::1
> instead, I get this in the reverse direction (from wieck):
My desktop's IP: 2001:7a8:820:1::31
> traceroute to 2001:7a8:820:1::1 (2001:7a8:820:1::1), 30 hops
On 29/10/2009 12:20, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Laurent CARON wrote:
I'm currently unable to reach security.debian.org
(2001:8d8:2:1:6564:a62:0:2) through IPv6.
Judging from the traceroute, it seems that Hurricane Electric and
OneAndOne are peering, but pe
Hi,
I'm currently unable to reach security.debian.org
(2001:8d8:2:1:6564:a62:0:2) through IPv6.
donald:~# traceroute -M tcpconn -p 80 wieck.debian.org -n -6
traceroute to wieck.debian.org (2001:8d8:2:1:6564:a62:0:2), 30 hops max, 80
byte packets
1 2001:7a8:820:1::1 0.170 ms 0.151 ms 0.126 m
On 11/09/2009 01:40, BH wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone had experience or could recommend free open source
WAN Accelerators/Optimizers. There seems to be only one FOSS project called
TrafficSqueezer but development has stopped and the project is still in an
Alpha stage.
I am not interest
On 07/09/2009 19:01, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Yup. Compare this current radb lookup -
sur...@frodo 09:53:21 :~$ whois -h whois.radb.net 213.215.28.0/23
route: 213.215.28.0/23
descr: LNC-1
origin: AS49463
mnt-by: NERIM-MNT
changed:boua...@nerim.net 2
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did set-up this netblock behind two pipes.
>
> One on AS13193 (which is working flawlessy), and ahother on AS12670
> (which I doubt of).
>
> Can please any of you tell me if from your
On 06/09/2009 15:56, Bin Dai wrote:
Hi:
I am interested in ur question to nanog about doubting whether AS 49463
is reachable thourgh AS 12670.
in ur case, AS 49463 is multihomed. what you want to do,if i am right,
is that you wanna make the following things happen:
the 213.215.28.0/23 is reachabl
On 05/09/2009 16:30, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
Completel AS12670 don't announce your route 213.215.28.0/23 to their
peers so your route is only visible through Nerim AS13193.
Did you announce your route 213.215.28.0/23 to Completel AS12670 ?
Hi,
I'm of course announcing it to their upstream rou
Hi,
I did set-up this netblock behind two pipes.
One on AS13193 (which is working flawlessy), and ahother on AS12670
(which I doubt of).
Can please any of you tell me if from your location 213.215.28.0 is
reachable through AS12670 ?
Thanks
Laurent
13 matches
Mail list logo
