RE: NPE-G2 vs. Sup720-3BXL

2009-05-15 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
We're running several six 65xx Sup720-3BXL with 3 full transit views and some 40-odd peers. We use two NPE-G1s for reflectors and some policy manipulation. Also running MPLS in the core to allow for traffic engineering and EoMPLS between certain services located in different locations. We're

Re: SIP - perhaps botnet? anyone else seeing this?

2009-04-15 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
through SIP and hopefully exploit if attached to PRI's or PSTN for toll fraud. I really do learn something new everyday, some smart deviant people out there. On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Leland E. Vandervort lel...@taranta.discpro.org wrote: Hi All, Over the past couple of days we

SIP - perhaps botnet? anyone else seeing this?

2009-04-10 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
Hi All, Over the past couple of days we have been seeing an exponential increase (about 200-fold) in the amount of UDP SIP Control traffic in our netflow data. The past 24 hours, for example, has shown a total of nearly 300 GB of this traffic incoming and over 400 GB outgoing -- this despite

Re: SIP - perhaps botnet? anyone else seeing this?

2009-04-10 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
making life fun for the rest of us ;) Thanks Leland On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Roland Dobbins wrote: On Apr 10, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Leland E. Vandervort wrote: UDP SIP Control traffic in our netflow data. Have you grabbed some packets in order to ensure it's actually SIP, vs. something else

Re: SIP - perhaps botnet? anyone else seeing this?

2009-04-10 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Roland Dobbins wrote: IANAL, but I suggest you check again with your legal department - I doubt this is actually the case (your jurisdiction may vary, but in most Western nations, you can grab packets for diagnostic/ troubleshooting/forensics purposes). Already did

Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

2009-02-17 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Mike Lewinski wrote: German Martinez wrote: bgp max-as will NOT protect you from this exploit (but if you are not vulnerable it should prevent you from propogating it). I can confirm this statement... (unfortunately) L.

RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

2009-02-16 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
bgp maxas-limit has a default value of 75 if you don't include it explicitly in the config so in this case it wouldn't have made much of a difference. L. On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Jon Lewis wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, John van Oppen wrote: Yep we saw the same, every customer with old IOS had

RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

2009-02-16 Thread Leland E. Vandervort
, and our maxas-limit settings did trigger and reject these. On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Leland E. Vandervort wrote: bgp maxas-limit has a default value of 75 if you don't include it explicitly in the config so in this case it wouldn't have made much of a difference. L. On Mon, 16 Feb 2009