Re: Amazon Peering

2019-01-30 Thread Luca Salvatore via NANOG
w.ics-il.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > ---------- > *From: *"Luca Salvatore via NANOG" > *To: *"North American Network Operators' Group" > *Sent: *Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:45:29 AM > *Subject: *Re: Amazon Pee

Re: Amazon Peering

2019-01-30 Thread Luca Salvatore via NANOG
Similar experiences here with Amazon. Initially had semi-regular responses from their peering team, they issued LOAs, I ordered the x-connects and then radio silence for months. At the point now where I'm disconnecting x-connects since it's a waste of money. On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:49 AM

Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?

2018-06-14 Thread Luca Salvatore via NANOG
Netbox. Open source IPAM and DCIM built by DigitalOcean https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:50 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Either phpipam or nipap. > > Both use fairly standard database backends and db schema (usually something > as simple as mariadb listenong on

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

2018-05-21 Thread Luca Salvatore via NANOG
To answer your specific question - In the regions we use 3356 (NYC and SFO/Bay Area) 3356 have been solid. I’d even say they have less issues than the other usual tier 1 providers... for example 1299 had a hell of a week last week around SFO was 3356 was stable. Can’t comment on what I’d say are

Re: mrtg alternative

2016-03-25 Thread Luca Salvatore via NANOG
Look into AKiPS.. Some of the guys from Statseeker made it better :-) On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > +1 for Cacti. > > > I tried zenoss & observium but still Cacti is more cool in terms of > tweaking templates as well as the tree mode for easy