On 2012-06-08, at 12:48 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> I'm sorry, my brain doesn't hold that many passwords. Unless you're a savant,
> neither does
> yours. So what you're telling me and the rest of the world is impossible.
https://agilebits.com/onepassword (1Password) is one solution to managing
On 2012-03-08, at 2:10 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> Which fuel is present affects the label durability...
Diesel.
On 2012-03-08, at 2:01 PM, Jim Richardson wrote:
> I have had good results with printed labels covered in clear
> heatshrink. Awkward, time consuming, and generally annoying, but
> works, and lasts.
A bit more detail I should have included ...
These are pleasure craft, so stuff goes under the
I have a couple of wiring projects coming up on salt water-going vessels and
I'm curious as to people's experiences with different types of cable marking
products in a high-humidity / salt air / bilge environment
None of the markers will be directly exposed to the outside elements, but quite
a
I just went through some calculations for a (government) site that has the
following rules:
[...]
Under the plausible assumption that very many people will start with a string
of digits, continue with a string of lower-case letters to reach seven
characters,
and then add a period, there are onl
There really is no winner or "right way" on this thread. In IPv4 as a
security guy we have often implemented NAT as an extra layer of obfuscation.
It's worse than just obfuscation. The 'security' side effect of NAT can
typically be implemented by four or five rules in a traditional firewall.
> The last mile for the Level3 is coming on Telus (after a punch to
> the face and gut for build out fee) so I'd like someone else.
> Shaw does not offer service without what I suspect is another
> punch to the face for a build out. Bell didn't return any of my
> inquiries via email of voice messa
I hope someone will explain the operational relevance
of this ...
Sun V100 FreeBSD firewall/border gateway
Sun V100 Plan 9 kernel porting test bed
Sun V100 OpenBSD build/test/port box
Intel 8-core Solaris fileserver and zones host
AMDx4Random OS workstation
Sorry, poorly worded. What I was wondering is there is an equivalent of
KA9Q for IPv6. I believe one of the comments we got back when we were
trying to reclaim 44/8 was that folks couldn't migrate to IPv6 because
no software was available...
We've come a little way since NOS. Linux has nati
Does it make sense that ham radio operators have
routable IP address space any longer?
Yes. Keep your mitts off 44!
> no no no.. it's simply, since the OP posited a math solution, md5.
> ship the size of file + hash, compute file on the other side. All
> files can be moved anywhere regardless of the size of the file in a
> single packet.
MD5 compression is lossy in this context. Given big enough files
you're g
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
There underlying problem here is flying sheep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY
Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
Bugger. Now I have to renumber out of my 172.16/12 subnets :-(
> Guess that move to Amazon EC2 wasn't such a good idea. First reddit,
> now netflix.
> http://techblog.netflix.com/2010/12/four-reasons-we-choose-amazons-cloud-as.html
FWIW, at $DAYJOB we haven't been able to run out a pool of a couple of
dozen EC2 instances for more than two weeks (since last Ju
> Just how much free time do you have? :)
1 minute to google the capacity of a 747-400F.
1 minute to google the dimensions and weight of an lto-4 cartridge.
1 minute to punch the numbers into bc(1).
--lyndon
> Also, who you will really trust to run it ?
The UUCP network chugged along quite nicely for many years without any
central authority. (Pathalias and the maps weren't an authority, just
a hint.)
--lyndon
> Marketing by annoyance, smoke, and mirrors? Gotta love the strategy
But as was demonstrated by the link they posted earlier today, they
make a good filter for determining "news" organizations that operate
on the theory of "news by press release."
Think of them as a honeypot feed :-P
--lyndon
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not
> sound like a 587 problem to me.
>
> netalyzr folks? comment?
Sorry, I hit send too soon ...
I've heard from a couple of people that the PIX will remap 587 (and 25)
to oddball por
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not
> sound like a 587 problem to me.
>
> netalyzr folks? comment?
Cisco PIX?
because most of the end users who would be querying it are in
Canada, and, with one nameserver in Canada and one in Japan,
they would get a long RTT on DNS queries roughly half the time.
But only, say, once per week if you're running a reasonable TTL on your
zone.
You could certainly add uux and uux to the list of legal remote commands, but I
confess that my memory is also dim about whether
uucp file a!b!c
would be translated automatically. It has indeed been a while...
I'm pretty sure it was adding 'uucp' in the commands list that enabled the
File transfer wasn't multihop
It was, for at least some versions (V2 and later?), if the intermediate
site(s) allowed execution of the uucp command. 25 years on the brain is
fuzzy on the details ...
--lyndon
s...@cs.columbia.edu:
> I am seriously suggesting that a redirect mechanism -- perhaps the email
> equivalent of HTPP's 301/302 -- would be worth considering.
We already have SMTP's 221 and 521 response codes for this. But because the
response text is free-form there's no way to reliably parse ou
I have a client in Edmonton who's looking for a network drop to their
office, something in the 2-10 MB/s range. The location is at 46 Ave.
and 99 St.
The core requirement is for a bare unfiltered *symmetric* pipe (no
ADSL). Traffic volume will be low: 2-4 laptop VPNs plus some light
web server an
> RFID tags are generic, you don't put data into them unique to your
> application.
Field programmable RFID-like tags do exist. They aren't common, but
they're out there.
> Barry's right, for at least some scenarios. If I have an unauthorized somebody
> walking down the row with a wand in their pocket, the fact they have a wand in
> their pocket is the least of my problems.
Encrypt the data?
> FWIW: http://www.he.net/releases/release18.html
How long can they go on those 3000 gallons under their current
load?
> Rogers
> says they don't do that, and lots of other people seem to be able to
> use port 587 on Rogers (and other ISPs) without problems.
I'm in Calgary right now so I can't check the current behaviour, but
as of June 1st it was still broken. Broken in the sense that any
connection to port 587
> Few
> companies use the MSP port (tcp/587).
Can you elaborate. Is this based on analysis you've conducted on
your own network? And if so, is the data (anonymized) available for
the rest of us to look at?
My experience is that port 587 isn't used because ISPs block it
out-of-hand. Or in the ca
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:46 -0700, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:19:36PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> > If you want to avoid any unpleasant questions at the border, then the
> > right thing to do is probably to find out what supporting paperwork is
> > required to support the impo
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:14 -0400, Joe Provo wrote:
> then you should be shifting your userbase to authenticated on the
> SUBMIT
> port [587] anyway...
Except for those ISPs who choose to intercept port 587 as well. This is
a big problem with Rogers in Vancouver. They hijack port 587 connections
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:54 -0400, Peter Boone wrote:
> Oh I know. Luckily it's located in an industrial area just on the
> outskirts
> of the city. There isn't a lot of other WiFi (in my opinion); 3-5
> total
> SSIDs spread across 2 of the 3 physical channels (1,6,11) depending on
> which
> roofto
Autonomous systems will be assigned 16-bit identification
numbers (in much the same ways as network and protocol numbers
are now assigned), and every EGP message header contains one word
for this number.
Was that a 36-bit word?
--lyndon
I think 3B2 code deserves its own place
Not if the ship is literally encased in concrete at the shore.
Which solves all your other problems as well.
But that's not a ship, it's a building.
There are even examples of actual free-floating ships which have
been stable for a decade or more.
And many counter-examples.
--lyndon
On 1-Dec-08, at 10:27 AM, Danny McPherson wrote:
On a related noted, some have professed that adapting old
ships into data centers would provide eco-friendly secure
data center solutions.
Your data connection to shore is going to be tenuous at best. One good
blow strong enough to make you dr
Anyone from Rogers out there that can help me with port 587 proxy
insanity? (Don't give me the 1-8xx numbers, thank you.)
ASN Number NameHandle
Location Organization
40543 1-800-GOT-JUNK [ABI19-ARIN]
{Vancouver, BC, CA} 1-800-GOT-JUNK
I guess somebody thinks that whois has advertising potential.
Thats actually th
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
