a customer places on their LAN.
As a service provider, it's better to burn one TCAM slot per customer for the
prefix you route to them, and leave adjacency relationships within their home
to them.
Think of MAC address table size limits on switches. Similar problem.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
://www.internode.on.net/news/2011/08/238.php It ain't
that hard)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man
home PBX network to tell the boss you're too hungover to come to
work.
Owen's world has built in automated protection to help you through the fact that
IPv6 subnetting will turn you to drink :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network
predict an end-user's
address? have no good answer. If any systems folks want a nice meaty problem
domain to focus their efforts on, DNS would be da shiznit.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email
On 11/08/2011, at 12:41 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
On 11/08/2011, at 12:30 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Finally a useful post in this thread. Good work on the deployment of real
ipv6!
Thanks. And thanks to Vendor-C for helping us through it. The IPv6 Broadband
featureset on the ASR
you are and where you want to be, any forward
progress whatsoever is a positive when there's a growing thunderstorm
behind you :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H
more of them than they do now.
Widespread multihoming might be technically pure, but I reckon most customers
would rather eat their firstborns than take up the option.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
On 19/05/2011, at 8:00 PM, Rodolfo (kix) wrote:
Hi!
what is the status of the reverse DNS in IPv6?
Rhymes with muster duck.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org
that'll open up.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile: +61
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile: +61-416-202-223
On 04/02/2011, at 3:43 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Mark Newton new...@internode.com.au
wrote:
On 04/02/2011, at 2:13 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
An armed FBI special agent shows up at your facility and tells your
ranking manager to shut down the Internet
respond accordingly.
Layer 3 access networks could conceivably have an issue here, though.
It's almost as if everyone ought to have been working on this a decade
ago so that we'd have a workable solution by now! :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
Neal's entire political party seems to share her
mastery of of the issue.
ObNOG: Botnets are bad, n'kay?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd
, right?
Regards,
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile: +61-416-202-223
pressure from
our CFOs and CTOs to get rid of it well before the ten-year estimate expires.
... and if we don't, our customers will.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H
, but is there a general
expectation that the v4-v6 transition is going to be an easy ride
for everyone?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd
On 06/03/2010, at 1:06 AM, David Conrad wrote:
Mark,
On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
On 05/03/2010, at 2:50 PM, David Conrad wrote:
When the IPv4 free pool is exhausted, I have a sneaking suspicion you'll
quickly find that reclaiming pretty much any IPv4 space
into 450,000 saleable addresses for premium customers after the
SP-NAT box is turned on, right?
Problem solved :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd
dual stack on your
networks.
... and, unstated behind that, is the observation that pretty much any
proposed effort to squeeze more time out of IPv4 will inevitably have
the same answer :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
of recovering space.
There's sure to be an upper-bound on the cost of v4 space, limited by the
magnitude of effort required to do whatever you want to do without v4.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email
creating UPnP from whole cloth. We're
discussing a replacement of like-for-like, updating existing capabilities
to support IPv6.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H
that it's impractical to use in a service
provider environment until version 2 -- which, in the case of CGN,
will be too late.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H
the functionality I broke for them last week I'll have a revolt
on my hands...)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk
.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile: +61-416-202-223
doesn't have rights on the firewall (e.g. enterprise).
Would you be using Consumer Grade - IPV6 Enabled Router Firewalls in the
enterprise? 'cos if you would, I think I might have entered the wrong
thread :)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W
. You don't
have a product with the features we need so we'll use one of your
competitors instead. Lets revisit this when you're prepared to have
a conversation that doesn't include `lack of market demand' as a
reason for not doing it.)
Argh. Disillusionment, much?
- mark
--
Mark Newton
by the SHIM6 protocol layers
on the hosts... but we weren't allowed to call them NAT gateways,
because IPv6 isn't supposed to have any NAT in it :)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new
On 03/12/2009, at 22:46, TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mark Newton [mailto:new...@internode.com.au]
On 03/12/2009, at 9:51 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:
You're correct, out of the box there aren't many. The first
couple that
come to mind are the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme
independently-developed working code for their
hardware platforms, have the least excuse out of any of them. Years
and years of talk, and no customer-visible action whatsoever. What
an exceptionally ordinary performance.
See you in Melbourne next week, Fred :)
- mark
--
Mark Newton
On 03/12/2009, at 12:53 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Would you consider Juniper SSG5 as a Consumer Grade router?
Depends. Can I get one at Frys for $69.95 and set it up with
a web browser?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
of the box, but don't support v6 natively.
Apple seems to have ideological objections to DHCPv6, so at the moment
there's little hope at all that prefix delegation will work on any of their
CPE products.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network
.
(I have a bug open with them, and I'm confident that it'll be fixed...
but c'mon...!)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd
of comparison to a lab environment.
Does the CCNA exam still ask questions about RIP and classful
addressing?
Just askin' :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H
://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26021106-15306,00.html
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man
standing to drag them into court over false
declarations
to ARIN? Will ARIN be suing their members? Not likely.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode
of v6 NAT.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile
under v4 and v6, and you don't want to reinvent the ALG
wheel.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8
are not being performed.
On a commodity consumer CPE device, the ALG code doubles as a
stateful inspection engine.
So it _is_ required when address translations are not being performed.
Is security something that gets thought about now, or post-deployment?
- mark
--
Mark Newton
by the time we've put carrier NATs everywhere the users will
notice that all by themselves, and we won't need to tell them anything.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H
, which is probably an even worse
proposition :-)
I'm strongly in favour of ASPLAIN. I reckon the people who advocate
using dots because they think 32-bit ASNs up to 4 billion are too long
to remember are probably getting old :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
Network Man - Anagram of Mark Newton Mobile: +61-416-202-223
42 matches
Mail list logo
