Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

2021-11-20 Thread Max Harmony via NANOG
On 21 Nov 2021, at 00.00, Joe Maimon wrote: > > There is a clear difference of opinion on this, that there stands a very good > chance that prompt implementation now may prove to provide significant > benefit in the future, should IPv6 continue to lag, which you cannot > guarantee it wont.

Re: Google uploading your plain text passwords

2021-06-12 Thread Max Harmony via NANOG
On 12 Jun 2021, at 10.29, William Herrin wrote: > > They > snuck it on me. By hiding it right on the "browser features" page? signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: NDAA passed: Internet and Online Streaming Services Emergency Alert Study

2021-01-02 Thread Max Harmony via NANOG
On 02 Jan 2021, at 22.38, Matthew Petach wrote: > It doesn't look like there's currently any internet-capable way of > consuming the IPAWS feed, at least that a quick search engine > dive turns up. Wondering if any of the folks here know of providers > that have signed up with FEMA to

Re: NDAA passed: Internet and Online Streaming Services Emergency Alert Study

2021-01-02 Thread Max Harmony via NANOG
On 02 Jan 2021, at 19.18, Matthew Petach wrote: > I think the challenge here is that there's a category of people > who don't have cell phones, who don't have cable TV, but > receive content over their internet connection. I happen to > live with someone like that, so I know it's a non-zero

Re: Are the days of the showpiece NOC office display gone forever?

2020-12-16 Thread Max Harmony via NANOG
On 16 Dec 2020, at 15.49, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > With the covid19 situation, obviously lots of ISPs have their NOC personnel > working from home, with VPN (or remote desktop) access to all the internal > tools, VoIP at home, etc. > > In the traditional sense, by "showpiece NOC" I mean a room

Re: The Real AI Threat?

2020-12-10 Thread Max Harmony via NANOG
> On 10 Dec 2020, at 18.11, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > > Let me know when a program will rewrite itself and add its own features ... > then we may have a problem... otherwise they only do what you want them to do. Programs have never done what you *want* them to do, only what you *tell*

Re: Technology risk without safeguards

2020-11-04 Thread Max Harmony
On 04 Nov 2020, at 19.54, Sabri Berisha wrote: > RF emissions are absorbed by the human body. Your kitchen microwave works at > the same frequency as your 2.4Ghz wifi. We all know it's a bad idea to put > your > head in a microwave oven. It's a bad idea because you'll get burns. EM radiation

Re: Oct. 3, 2018 EAS Presidential Alert test

2018-10-03 Thread Max Harmony
I got it, but not until 14.34. For a system that's supposed to be able to warn people of incoming nuclear attack, that seems unacceptably slow. Ar Mer, 3 Hyd 2018 am 14:52 Andy Ringsmuth ysgrifennodd: > > Did anyone on AT or an iPhone receive the test today? I believe it was > supposed to happen