Not sure exactly what your environment looks like, but we encountered
something similar when trunking Cisco-DELL and Cisco-Juniper switches.
We run RSTP on DELL and Juniper switches, but RPVST+ on Cisco. In the
beginning we just allow those VLANS we need between Cisco-DELL/Juniper
switches, then
DELL Force10 switches (not DELL Power Connect) run so far so good in
our environment. the combination of S4810 and Z9000 make good sense on
both operation and capex point of view.
There were three headaches for us in the beginning of adaption.
Force10 calculates frame size with CRC32, say if your
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
blake.mailingl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
Let me also clarify, Price per port is not the final deciding factor. We are
looking much more at a combination of daily operational sanity,
troubleshooting features, operational feature set,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Wininger jwinin...@ifncom.net
Are there data centers out there that are fiber only? That is to say
that the cross connects are fiber only and no copper cross connects
are available?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Daniel STICKNEY dstick...@optilian.com wrote:
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
(different ISPs), and I wanted to see if this wheel has already been
invented. Has anyone already set this up or tested it ?
When you talking
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:05 PM, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Kim
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:57 AM
To: jba...@brightok.net; b...@herrin.us
Cc: ayousuf0...@gmail.com; nanog group
Subject: RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover
One can take
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
I do not think that paragraph means what you think it means.
I've seen my own AS in full tables from upstreams using Juniper routers many
times.
According
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Michael Hallgren m.hallg...@free.fr wrote:
I believe my ISP did not intentionally filter out my routes,
but it more like default behavior as described in document.
Setting up default-route on both of my border routers addressed the needs.
I feel, asking to
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Bogdan shos...@shoshon.ro wrote:
allowas-in will do the trick
Provided your uplink ISP does not filter out that.
Why would
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Bogdan shos...@shoshon.ro wrote:
On 14.01.2011 12:06, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
allowas-in will do the trick
Provided your uplink ISP does not filter out that.
--
Michel~
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 2:41 AM, Tarig Ahmed tariq198...@hotmail.com wrote:
We have wide range of Public IP addresses, I tried to assign public ip
directly to a server behined firewall( in DMZ), but I have been resisted.
Security guy told me is not correct to assign public ip to a server, it
11 matches
Mail list logo
