because you can doesn't make it a
good idea. I agree, NAT != security, but it does give one a single point
to manage those hosts behind it.
Beckman
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
.
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Peter Beckman beck...@angryox.com wrote:
Why the hell can't AOL integrate the standard listserv commands integrated
into many subscription emails into a friggin' button in their email
client, right next
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---
, implementing a fix like this would reduce network
traffic. By how much, I don't know.
Beckman
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com
0.0% 7 118.3 114.9 109.7 120.2
4.6
209.85.255.102
209.85.255.110
20. ew-in-f103.google.com 0.0% 7 110.0 109.4 108.0 110.6
1.1
---
Peter Beckman
209.85.254.247 (209.85.254.247) 28.897 ms 209.85.254.249
(209.85.254.249) 29.192 ms 29.649 ms
12 209.85.255.194 (209.85.255.194) 29.326 ms gw-in-f100.google.com
(74.125.67.100) 28.393 ms 209.85.255.194 (209.85.255.194) 35.464 ms
-Original Message-
From: Peter Beckman [mailto:beck
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Peter Beckman wrote:
I'm OK to that IP as well, but when I query www.google.com, I get multiple
IPs, but here are the ones that in in 147:
DNS Server IP Route (for me)
205.234.170.217 (tiggee)74.125.79.147 Amsterdam
208.67.222.222
/google-broken.gif
Beckman
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---
.
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---
98.8% 245 1189. 1123. 1086. 1189. 57.5
30. ???
Beckman
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.angryox.com/
---
the PBL, the PBL will be blocked until the PBL is being properly
implemented.
Get it together, Spamhaus, help us out.
Beckman
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.angryox.com/
---
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.angryox.com/
---
.
Beckman
---
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.angryox.com/
---
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Peter Beckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let the search engines organize the web, not DNS.
OK, (assuming you believe that), why keep dns around. Why not go back
to just IP addrs and hosts files for those that need them
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Luke S Crawford wrote:
Peter Beckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you are taking card-not-present credit card transactions over the
...snip hard to charge fradulent customers and also verifying customer
identity annoys the customer... points-
The goal here is to give
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Barry Shein wrote:
On May 28, 2008 at 21:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Beckman) wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I would think that simply requiring some appropriate amount of irrevocable
funds (wire transfer, etc) for a deposit that will be forfeited
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
