On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:14, harbor235 wrote:
If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
need to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover
the
required 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
Although more
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 21:51 +, Paul Cupis wrote:
There are a number of network operators capable of supplying SDSL (Annex
B) in the UK depending on the location.
Really? I heard BT were phasing out SDSL due to the low take-up, and
the likes of TalkTalk are providing Annex M services with
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:01 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I have suggested more than a few times to vendors that the command:
show bgp ipv4 unicast 100.10.0.0/16 why-chosen
Would be insanely useful.
+1 for that, in a similar manner to packet-tracer on ASAs.
Peter
On 27/05/2010 16:48, Tim Franklin wrote:
I get a lovely vision from that of a real old-style manual switchboard
operator, frantically plugging internet connections together with
patch cords as each SYN packet rings a little bell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgqEIp2YmtE
Poggs
Anton Kapela wrote:
Web browser embedded flash player:
http://nanog.iristransport.net/nanog48/
7pm appears to be a bad time to tune in if you're in the UK...
Poggs
Dean Belev wrote:
I'm curious if some of you faced such a problem - reboot of the router
caused by the console connection.
I once managed to send a BREAK signal to a 3640 by plugging in a console
cable. At the time, it was a pretty key router in the network and sat
at the rommon prompt :)
Tony Finch wrote:
Stateful inspection is useful for breaking things in subtle and
hard-to-debug ways.
http://fanf.livejournal.com/102206.html
http://fanf.livejournal.com/95831.html
Is that really stateful inspection? Isn't the SMTP fixup on a PIX an
application-level gateway?
I
Glen Kent wrote:
Any idea if folks use AH or ESP to protect IGMP/PIM packets? Wondering
that if they do, then how would snooping switches work?
Would encrypting multicast not fundamentally break the concept of
multicast itself, unless you're encrypting multicast traffic over a
backbone?
rodrick brown wrote:
This may be slightly off topic however I have a very unique situation
where I need to provide two diverse paths to a major stock exchange.
Each host may either use route A or B for any given reason to access
this particular exchange using two distinct routers and target
All,
I have a Quick Eagle DL087E here, but Quick Eagle's website has fallen
off the planet:
p...@angel:~$ host -t any www.quickeagle.com
Host www.quickeagle.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Can anyone help me out with a firmware update and/or PDF manuals? It's
been a little while since I had
Bret Clark wrote:
How does this stuff ever make it to court??? Why is it an ISP is
responsible for policing it's customers? I'm constantly getting called
up from scammers trying to offering me bogus warranty insurance for cars
I don't own...does that mean I can sue Verizon because they are
Nick Hilliard wrote:
Definitely. For fun and giggles, I recently turned on 30 second polling
on some kit and it turned up all sorts of interesting peculiarities that
were completely blotted out in a 5 minute average.
Would RMON History and Alarms help? I've always considered rolling them
Hello
Akhmedd Aly wrote:
can someone explain me why service providers (Internet and/or L3 VPN
services) obligate customers to use CE routers. Why they cannot
configure more than /30 (in some cases /31) subnet mask on PE
interface side for me? In that case I can use cheap L2 switch and use
13 matches
Mail list logo
