Re: any interesting/useful resources available to IPv6 only?

2019-05-05 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
I've found a VPS provider (https://www.vultr.com/pricing/) that offers cheaper instances with IPv6 only. I suspect that there might be others, as ultimately those sort of services can't really escape the issue by using NAT. kind regards Pshem On Sat, 4 May 2019 at 03:15, Brian J. Murrell

Re: CGNAT

2017-04-07 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
I can confirm that percentage (at least with residential customer base). All big content providers and a number of CDNs will do IPv6 by default. One thing that will heavily affect this is the CPE equipment (which might not have IPv6 enabled or even be capable of it). kind regards Pshem On Sat,

Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193

2016-09-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
overhead). kind regards Pshem On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 at 11:27 Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > In message < > caeazirxu7dh9o9ewdjfiemgdu7dt4v62w5+9+ctj2-rqznp...@mail.gmail.com>, > Pshem Kowalczyk writes: > > With NAT I have a single entry/exit point to those infras

Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193

2016-09-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
addressing or do you use your public space (and police that)? kind regards Pshem On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 at 10:27 Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > In message <CAEaZiRU+wgQ0GDzxcmtqKO=_ > sasavsnx31q_70q+udm1oeo...@mail.gmail.com>, Pshem Kowalczyk writes: > > Hi, > >

Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193

2016-09-08 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, We're looking at rolling out IPv6 to our internal DC infrastructure. Those systems support only our internal network and in the IPv4 world they all live in 'private' space of 10.0.0.0/8. I was wondering if anyone uses the fc00::/7 space for these sort of things or do ppl use a bit of their

Re: Peering + Transit Circuits

2015-08-18 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
It's actually quite easy. Provider1 is present at Exchange1 and Exchange2, so is Provider2. Provider2 doesn't want to pay for the traffic between Exchange1 and Exchange2, so it points a static route for all prefixes it has in Exchange2 via Provider1's IP address in Exchange1 and does the same in

Re: Dedicated Route Reflectors

2009-09-14 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, There are multiple ways you can solve that problem. We do the following: 1. Each region has its own ibgp cluster with 2 route reflectors (usually the P nodes, since they seem to have abundance of CPU power and not much to do with it). 2. All route reflectors (across regions) are fully

Re: Huawei cx300

2009-06-02 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
HI, As far as I understand CX300 does not support vpls (only point-to-point PWE3). I don't think that's even on the road map. kind regards Pshem 2009/5/29 Jack Kohn kohn.j...@gmail.com: Guys, Anybody any experience with VPLS on Huawei cx300? Jack

Colo on the West Coast

2009-05-26 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, I'm looking for a colo provider somewhere on the west coast, preferably somewhere close to one of the peering exchanges. A virtual machine will do. I want to use it to run a small performance monitoring box (traceroutes, pings, etc). I also would like to get a full bgp feed into it so I can

Re: Concerning MPLS paths

2009-04-28 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, 2009/4/28 Saqib Ilyas msa...@gmail.com: Hello everyone In the context of a single service provider network running MPLS, if a number of bandwidth constrained LSPs are passing through a particular node and the sum of the bandwidth constraints for the LSPs is X Mb/s, then is X the upper