I've found this article before and implemented it for domains that we own, but
do not use for e-mail purposes.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/protect-domains-that-dont-send-email
Might be worth checking it out.
Cheers,
Rafael
- Original message -
From: Konrad Zemek
To: nanog@nanog.org
After some time monitoring/troubleshooting, we are seeing what looks like
congestion between AS1299 and AS7018 at 350 Cermak during typical peak hours.
Could someone please reach out off-list if possible? Much appreciated.
Thanks,
Rafael
>I wish they'd add one more that turns off their "prefer routes learned from a
>customer" rule. I'm having to split my blocks in >half and announce them
>that way to get them to send my traffic directly to me through our IX peering
>session as opposed to >one of my transit providers.
>I'd
>but that it would be incumbent on Verizon to do the legwork to fix it since
>they are the ones who know their peering >agreements and have these contacts.
>Unfortunately it seems like policy that Verizon pushes any issues that aren't
>internal >routing issues to an external party, but surely
This may sound bad at first but look into FS.com if you're in a pinch. They may
not be seen as the typical true enterprise grade (I don't know?) but you can
probably buy a a new one and a new spare for the price of one overpriced used
switch.
From: NANOG On
Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent:
Here is a list: https://github.com/kahun/awesome-sysadmin#monitoring
Personally, I've used smokeping for over a decade (mrtg works too, or rrd and a
cron job), as well as librenms/prtg and as of the last couple of years a
software "stack" such as telegraf+influxdb+grafana, although that's more
Buried high voltage lines require expensive/complex insulation (oil, etc). It's
really expensive to build and to maintain these at enormous scale like the
continental USA. Not saying it's not possible, but definitely challenging.
Repairing damage to these lines is a lot more complicated than
This reminded me of a quote I read a long time ago: "Most people use statistics
like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination"
To your point with regards to multiple failures combined causing an outage,
here's some basic reading on the Swiss cheese model:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model
>From over here it looks like the legacy filter was a latent failure, and the
>BGP automation from the downstream
Noticed high latency from some smokeping instances from about 16:10 until 16:35
(central time). One of the worst variances was from ~20ms to upwards of 100ms
RTT.
Also do wifi calls from Android phone on VZW behind NAT, with no issues. I do
have a "network extender" which has GPS link and ethernet (also behind NAT) and
it does give me 5 bars around the house (up to 70mbps ish of download over
LTE).
Now, your NAT setup could possibly interefere? In my
Doesn't the mx204 have rackmount brackets rather than rails?
I wonder if the actual support service will be the same later on.
*Rafael Possamai*
Founder & CEO at E2W Solutions
*office:* (414) 269-6000
*e-mail:* raf...@e2wsolutions.com
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote:
> You too ? I gave up ...
Circuit utilization, capacity and availability shouldn't be calculated
separately in a data center environment. If you look at each separately you
risk making some expensive mistakes.
*Rafael Possamai*
Founder & CEO at E2W Solutions
*office:* (414) 269-6000
*e-mail:* raf...@e2wsolutions
I fail to see how drones relate to fiber cuts and the superbowl. Did the
article author just throw that in there? The news helicopter getting aerial
footage also poses a risk, so not sure what's special about drones.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
>
What a disgrace.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
> This is what's going on at verizon.
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/726/
>
> -Dan
>
>
If you apply for an IPv6 block, as an ISP, and you have the intention of
truly utilizing it, then you can apply for a /24 to facilitate that
transition.
It will cost you about $1500 or so, which is about half of what a /24 is
going for in the transfer market.
Thing is, if you take the IPv6 block
in — if they opted for the smaller /36 initial IPv6 direct allocation,
> rather than the default /32 direct allocation.
>
> That seems to balance toward buying an existing /24.
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafaelpo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> If y
A few years ago I had a couple boxes in a datacenter in Chicago that had
its traffic optimized by Internap. Latency wise, it was always the lowest
to my other applications, compared to other locations I had on-line. I am
not sure what other benefits it brought aside from lower latency. One thing
Similar to low-cost airlines, where you have to pay for a drink and a 4oz
bag of peanuts.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Nickles and dimes...
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest
T-Mobile implemented 464XLAT successfully, but I have no idea how long they
will still depend on IPv4 because of that setup.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Steve Mikulasik
wrote:
> Let's just hope carriers don't try to fix IPv4 instead of going to IPv6.
> I'd like
I have been seeing the same issues, but haven't heard anything back yet. It
has improved in the last 30 minutes or so, see below.
http://imgur.com/KVAzetA
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Ryan K. Brooks r...@hack.net wrote:
Seeing packet loss on AS4323 since 2:30 Central time. NOC is
Quick update: I moved away from Amazon SES to a private smtp server
provided by Chris, who is also helping moderate the list.
I left Amazon SES configured as a backup since the bounce rate after
thousands of emails peaked at only 0.08%
Thanks!
Rafael
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Rich
of people on the list posting hundreds (total, not each) of
messages per day. No complaints. *shrugs*
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org
To: Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
Cc: nanog
Hi Rich,
Thank you for letting me know, I expected Amazon to actually take care of
spammers and not let it be a free for all. I can definitely switch it
elsewhere, so please let me know what you have in mind.
I can let the mailman server do deliveries as well, so that's a second
option.
Best
I actually suggested this to Chris while discussing what to have in the
website, I definitely think it would be nice to have a platform to help
plan and schedule local events for social and networking purposes.
I am working with a few people on designing a website, so I am guessing
some time in
Hi Glen,
If you first list the causes of a dropped packet, then you can figure out
how likely they are at different points in time (first\last\peer\etc) by
making some assumptions.
Here's an **example**:
*Cause | Location | Likelihood*
Congestion | Last mile | Low
Congestion | First mile | Low
...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you say that Layer 1 issues in the last mile would be very high?
How is it any different from the first mile?
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
wrote:
Hi Glen,
If you first list the causes of a dropped packet, then you can figure out
Thanks! That works for Apache2.2. For those interested that are using
Apache2.4, make this change:
-Order deny,allow
-Deny from all
+Require all denied
The rest should be the same. Here is some more info:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html
Best,
Rafael
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at
wrote:
Interesting... I just went to the web site to subscribe and I received an
email that I was already subscribed.
I don't remember doing that... So how did this happen??
Robert
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:33:05 -0500
Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
I was actually surprised
I was actually surprised with how many people subscribed already. I think
we are close to 100 already in less than 24 hours.
I could use some help drafting some basic mailing list rules (no spam, no
soliciting, etc) and if anyone has any suggestions, please let me know.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at
I am setting one up and invited Chris to moderate it with me. I've always
looked for a list that covers that topic as well. I followed the same name
style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Ryan Finnesey r...@finnesey.com wrote:
Did you come across
:
On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.
Nad Cog?
North American Data Center Operations Group, perhaps?
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
What is the mailman URL?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Marcin Cieslak sa...@saper.info wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Downs wrote:
On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.
Nad Cog
The list just went live at lists.nadcog.org. I am open to any
suggestions, just let me know. When you say move forward with the concept,
do you mean get the organization started as well, not just the mailing list?
Thanks,
Rafael
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Mike the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
Haha, are you saying some people out there put nanog on their resume? I
thought 2008 was long gone.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Rather than fragmenting further, I'd suggest building up demand first
on existing infrastructure. If it gets to the size of
This is interesting, the DoD has a half trillion dollar budget, so not sure
what the motivation was to get rid of a /8.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Jérôme Nicolle jer...@ceriz.fr wrote:
Hello,
Just saw something suprising : 11/8 just came live from AS23352
(ServerCentral)
Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
To: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:07:34 AM
Subject: Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in
last 24
on multi 100GE mode very well :)
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
wrote:
Has anyone tried to implement real-time SQC in their network? You can
calculate summary statistics and use math to determine if traffic is
normal or if there's a chance it's garbage
Has anyone tried to implement real-time SQC in their network? You can
calculate summary statistics and use math to determine if traffic is
normal or if there's a chance it's garbage. You won't be able to notice
one-off attacks, but anything that repeats enough times should pop up.
Facebook uses
When I originally posted the thread, I had asked Chicago due to physical
proximity, and my assumption being the lesser the number of hops, the lower
the probability of running into issues (latency, jitter and congestion). On
the other hand, one of my sandboxes are out of Las Vegas and I haven't
The best way to complain is to simply move the service to another
provider (when possible). 50 bucks a month of revenue to them is not worth
the hassle of having a tech user asking for all sorts of non-standard
configs. It shouldn't be that way, but that's how it usually goes. Think
about it,
Depending on how exactly you have these servers configured with relation to
one another, small variations from one single source can be augmented down
the line.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
We have
I've referenced article 645 before, but you have to look at anything
upstream or downstream of the PDU as well, as the system as a whole needs
to be within standards.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Hi Folks,
Do you know of any regulations, standards or
Randy,
How long do you think it will take to completely get rid of IPv4? Or is it
even going to happen at all?
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
the rirs have run out of their free source of short ints to rent to us.
i am sure everyone will move to ipv6 in a
Good for you.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Irwin, Kevin kevin.ir...@cinbell.com
wrote:
Based on our 1Gbps residential customers usage, I believe you just sit at
home and run speedtest all day.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote
The portal should have some stats where you can do basic troubleshooting.
It's really easy to get registered on the portal, you just need account
number and customer name (which is scary, but go figure...).
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Michael Loftis mlof...@wgops.com wrote:
AFAIK
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't think it would for me. Anyone care to
comment?
Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single
person
it is overkill.
This sentiment keeps popping up. It's a failure of vision. To suggest
that single people or ordinary
Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message
cajb2g-h2cccqud7_bhpoydo+beysyzpy+js2p+hj6ruk0qx...@mail.gmail.com
, Rafael Possamai writes:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single
person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going
Be prepared to drop a lot of money for colocation with Verizon. Also,
quoting process is rather long and you will have to sign a NDA most likely,
which just makes it even more fun. For the size of your project I'd pick a
provider that focuses on colocation for small and medium businesses and is
Reading about SIP made it seem like latency alone is not an issue, aside
from delays which impact verbal communication as previously mentioned. What
is going to be much worse is jitter and packet loss. You can eventually get
used to a significant delay, but dropped calls and chopped sound renders
Here's a recent forum thread that discussed the same exact topic. You might
find some insight:
http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/3aip3p/data_center_network_monitoring/
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Mitch Howards hbf9...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
Was wondering what folks are
No wonder IPv4 is depleted. People's shoes have a MAC address nowadays...
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Rob Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
Stephen Satchell l...@satchell.net writes:
... They just couldn't believe that 300 people could max out their system
...
Last year, the group
I don't think there's an actual standard for density, at least I am not
aware of one. Independent of the vendor you use, this guide should be valid
at 80% of implementations:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-1250-series/design_guide_c07-693245.html
On Meraki's
Thanks everyone for your responses.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
Would anyone in the list be able to recommend a SIP trunk provider in the
Chicago area? Not a VoIP expert, so just looking for someone with previous
experience.
Thanks,
Rafael
are far behind on density. Check their case studies.
Em 20/06/2015 13:02, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br escreveu:
I don't think there's an actual standard for density, at least I am not
aware of one. Independent of the vendor you use, this guide should be
valid
at 80% of implementations
Would anyone in the list be able to recommend a SIP trunk provider in the
Chicago area? Not a VoIP expert, so just looking for someone with previous
experience.
Thanks,
Rafael
Using CGNAT doesn't sound right either, although I haven't read the whole
thing, but it seems reasonable to use that block for CGNAT only.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Tony Wicks t...@wicks.co.nz wrote:
Use 100.64.0.0/10, this is the CGNAT reserved
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:07:22PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
What about IPv6? We have a plan! We plan
Any luck on a DNS based solution?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
I have a mail system where there are two MX hosts, one in the US and one in
Europe. Both have a DNS MX record metric of 10 so a bastardized
round-robin takes place. This does not work so
I could be mistaken, but you might get all of this done with AWS's Route53.
I would read this:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-geo
The other step would be to setup HA in each SMTP node (US and France) such
as LB or Failover. Just an
for and maintaining an AS, but you
could improve your uptime significantly.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
wrote:
The other step would be to setup HA in each SMTP node (US and France)
such as LB
Does anyone know if there's an official ruling as to who gets to pay for
the SLA breaches?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:
Raymond,
But you said A simple 'sorry' would have done. Now you're asking for
lots more detail. Why the change?
-mel beckman
Well, I was wondering the same. I am guessing it depends on the SLA
contract since they are all very unique and specific. I assume they would
have to, granted the issue lasted for a couple hours. Now, it depends on
how they define the outage. A fiber cut that yields a customer's service
unusable
...@beckman.org wrote:
SLAs are part of a contract, and thus only apply to the parties of the
contract. There are no payments due to other parties. The Internet is a
best effort network, with zero guarantees.
-mel beckman
On Jun 14, 2015, at 4:06 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote
A lot of these things are for show only.. Like a big corporation donating
to non-profits and sponsoring feel good events. You can see that a lot of
these same businesses also lobby Washington like crazy, so there you go...
This was either an isolated incident or they really don't care much.
On
Hi everyone,
I know this is slightly off-topic, but since it's still related to the
list, I thought I'd give it a try. I am wondering what systems are out
there (open source, preferably) for data collection and processing of
hardware health data (temperature, CPU clock, fan speeds, etc). Ideally
Something about Malaysia, first the airplanes... now BGP leaks?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Martin Millnert milln...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Level3,
The Internet is a cooperative effort, and it works well only when its
participants take constructive actions to address errors and remedy
+1 for experience.. being able to teach yourself just about anything drops
you into the top 20% of any industry (with maybe a few exceptions). one
thing I noticed is that the best professionals I met out there are just as
good with people as they are with routers and console screens. IT is
usually
I also reboot for kernel updates!
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cowboy c...@cwf1.com
On Sunday 31 May 2015 03:49:10 pm Graham Wilman wrote:
after getting the play out working on clienta terminal for the past
You could look into LXD for that type of deployment.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Pavel Odintsov pavel.odint...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brilliant idea! But in Docker we could offer only sflow and sflow. Port
mirror capture need support from the kernel side. Will try shortly!
On Thursday, June
we are starting to waste packets arguing over some private intellectual
property
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
For example, let’s say you have 20 machines for whom you want
You could run a PDU in paralallel so that you don't use more current than
the wires are rated for (although the PDU should trip the circuti anyways
in case you overload it). Only problem is matching the receptacles. You
probably don't want to half-ass it, so I'd just add an extra PDU and run an
Security is an illusion - Confucius probably
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Joel Maslak jmas...@antelope.net wrote:
I also suspect not every telco validates number porting requests against
social engineering properly.
A telephone number isn't something you have, it is something your
You can also register a U2F key.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:17 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 09:13:47 +0530, Anil Kumar said:
that link, since I have two-step verification set up, I was presented
with a demand for a number provided by the Google Authenticator
app
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is: it depends. You can
model the cost of delivering your service and keep track of three types of
cost: fixed, variable and marginal. Here is a really good video that
explains these:
https://youtu.be/bBQVaRnHqLs
You might find an industry
James, curious to know... what size ISPs are they? In the last few years
with the larger ones it has always been about lowering cost and increasing
revenue, which throws the original idea of peering out the window (unless
you are willing to pay).
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:52 AM, James Bensley
Since you are considering multiple options, I'd build a decision matrix.
You can put down all the requirements, score each option, and then
normalize it to give each a final score. After that you can calculate some
other things such as throughput per dollar, etc.
Here is what I found on Google about Cisco's options:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/models-comparison.html
And when it comes to Juniper, you might be able to get it done with MX40
(look at their options, there are different combinations
Oops, Cisco ASR 1k series might not cut it, you can take a look at their 9k
seriers:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/asr-9000-series-aggregation-services-routers/models-comparison.html
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
What options are
Internap also has a product called MIRO, although I am not sure how it
differs from FCP.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
What is out there for route optimization products? I can think of Noction
(no inbound) or Internap FCP (old).
-
Mike Hammett
I've been a customer before of a datacenter in Chicago that uses/used
Internap's optimized routes and latency was always better than in
comparison to other locations I tested against. That was around 2011 or
2012.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
What is
board if my requirements allowed it. Stick it all in a nice card
cage and you're done.
As for performance per watt, I'd be surprised if this beat a modern video
processor for the right workload.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
wrote:
Maybe I messed up
Interesting! Knowing a pi costs approximately $35, then you need
approximately $350 to get near an i5.. The smallest and cheapest desktop
you can get that would have similar power is the Intel NUC with an i5 that
goes for approximately $350. Power consumption of a NUC is about 5x that of
the
= 10x Pi
$$: 1x i5 NUC = 10x Pi
Power: 1x i5 NUC = 5x Pi
So...if a single NUC gives you the performance of 10x Pis at the capital
cost of 10x Pis but uses half the power of 10x Pis and only a single
Ethernet port, how does the Pi win?
--
Hugo
On Mon 2015-May-11 17:08:43 -0500, Rafael
From the work that I've done in the past with clusters, your need for
bandwidth is usually not the biggest issue. When you work with big data,
let's say 500 million data points, most mathematicians would condense it
all down into averages, standard deviations, probabilities, etc, which then
become
- The more switches a packet has to go through, the higher the latency, so
your response times may deteriorate if you cascade too many switches.
Legend says up to 4 is a good number, any further you risk creating a big
mess.
- The more switches you add, the higher your bandwidth utilized by
Personal opinion: developing countries tend to have unstable utility
service (power is what matters here), so your DC of choice in India should
be Tier 4 preferably, which are hard to find and really expensive. Budget
allowing, I'd stick to Hong Kong, Shangai or Singapore as you mentioned
be the 1st place to look at.
Good luck, Shimon
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Possamai [mailto:raf...@gav.ufsc.br]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 17:37
To: Jean-Francois Mezei
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: ADSL Line Extenders
Semi-related question: in instances like
Semi-related question: in instances like this, wouldn't a point-to-point
link provide larger throughput and be less expensive? Unless you are
talking about several subscribers that are already installed and operating.
Depending on the situation, it might make sense to set a few sectorial
antennas
Hi Shawn,
If you don't leave slack, you can't really pull the server out of the RU
for maintenance (hot swaps, etc). Your best choice is to purchase cable
management trays if that makes sense (Dell servers usually come with
those). Otherwise you just need to deal with the loops and whatnot the
Received some fake FedEx emails coming from secureserver.net servers that
afaik belong to GoDaddy.
I can give more details if someone speaks up. GMail anti-spam only picked
up a few of these, others went straight through to inbox.
Regards,
Rafael
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Kain, Rebecca (.) bka...@ford.com wrote:
Ah, Comcast support. Those people who keep calling my Ford Motor Company
phone, to threaten to shut off service to my home, which I don't have (I
have uverse). They keep saying they will take my Ford number off the
, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br
wrote:
I am a huge fan of FreeBSD, but for a medium/large business I'd definitely
use a fairly well tested security appliance like Cisco's ASA.
Or maybe Juniper, Cisco's Ironport, IPSO?
They are all FreeBSD based, big and large critical networks ready
Thank you for looking up facts, laws, etc... The rest is merely opinion,
and wouldn't necessarily help someone trying to protect their network
designs.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:28:25 -0500, William Herrin said:
I have to disagree
I am a huge fan of FreeBSD, but for a medium/large business I'd definitely
use a fairly well tested security appliance like Cisco's ASA. Depending on
the traffic you have on your fiber uplink, you can get a redundant pair of
ASAs running for less than $2,000 in the US. I just find it less
13, 2015 at 02:45:46PM -0600, Rafael Possamai wrote:
I am a huge fan of FreeBSD, but for a medium/large business I'd
definitely
use a fairly well tested security appliance like Cisco's ASA.
Closed-source software is faith-based security.
---rsk
I've had a similar mistake happen with TWC. It's most likely a glitch in
their config system which should use the gateway's mac address in order to
assign a static IP on the docsis modem. Tech support should figure this out
pretty quick without escalating it much further. I've had an instance
Some folks might disagree with this, but if it's an important service that
I have running on a network, I will block a series of garbage AS's (closer
to /8 the better) at the firewall (not at the edge) and that reduces the
headaches by 50%. This isn't practical at the edge, but for system
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo