Re: Question on peering strategies

2016-05-23 Thread Reza Motamedi
fabric. Is this just because that shared fabric has geographical reach, as in the case of IXReach? I also see that links provided in this discussion show Europe based networks that are using this peering type more often. Is this widely accepted that US market is totally different from Europe? Best R

Re: Question on peering strategies

2016-05-16 Thread Reza Motamedi
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and > its attachments from all computers. > > -Original Message

Question on peering strategies

2016-05-16 Thread Reza Motamedi
? Can the networks do load balancing on the two connection and essentially use them as primary routes? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon

Figuring out traceroute

2016-03-10 Thread Reza Motamedi
all different ports of one router? I think the other explanation is that there is switch (or something that does not have IP footprint) between `From` side and `To` side. How probable do you think this second explanation is? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M)

Re: Inferring the location points of traffic exchange between two networks

2016-01-13 Thread Reza Motamedi
13 ESTAB 317d 9h 1m0 0 569704 0 192.65.184.24 513 ESTAB 54d16h26m 0 0 569704 0 tells me that 513 is peering with 20965 that city, right? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group C

Inferring the location points of traffic exchange between two networks

2016-01-13 Thread Reza Motamedi
uld be a flag to differentiate records showing iBGP vs eBGP. On the same note, if we issue the commands on a router other than the border router in San Fran, is there any difference in the output of show commands? Now how are things different if we actually run the commands on that gateway ro

Re: interconnection costs

2015-12-23 Thread Reza Motamedi
All the costs of HW, SW, personnel, administration, and perhaps transmission between colos (including remote peering, being waved to another location, tethering) would be the same, right? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science

Re: interconnection costs

2015-12-23 Thread Reza Motamedi
a normal practice. Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 23 December 2015 at 20:05

Re: interconnection costs

2015-12-22 Thread Reza Motamedi
;settlement free" peering. Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:33 AM, James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 December 2015 at 16:44, Reza Mot

interconnection costs

2015-12-22 Thread Reza Motamedi
there is no single answer as different businesses may have different pricing models. I hope the discussion can help me understand the whole ecosystem a little bit better. Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon

Re: distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

2015-03-11 Thread Reza Motamedi
, but can it help? Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information Science University of Oregon On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 11/Mar/15 21:42, Reza Motamedi wrote: What I ultimately

Re: distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

2015-03-11 Thread Reza Motamedi
3 0 2828 209 i * 65.106.7.55 3 0 2828 209 i * 216.156.2.1622 0 2828 209 i Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network Research Group Computer and Information

Re: distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

2015-03-11 Thread Reza Motamedi
at the location of the router, or if packets need to stay for some hops in the local AS. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015, 2:51 PM Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 11/Mar/15 20:32, Reza Motamedi wrote: Hi Nanog, For a research I want to distinguish the external AS peering from show ip BGP. In other

distinguishing eBGP from show ip BGP

2015-03-11 Thread Reza Motamedi
209 i * 65.106.7.56 3 0 2828 209 i * 216.156.2.1652 0 2828 209 i * 65.106.7.144 2 0 2828 209 i Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow Oregon Network

What can I infer from show ip route and similar BGP commands?

2014-12-08 Thread Reza Motamedi
AS-path translation: { OREGONUNIV UONET } car1.Sacramento1 (metric 34363) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal Community: North_America Lclprf_100 Level3_Customer United_States Sacramento Originator: car1.Sacramento1 Best Regards Reza Motamedi (R.M) Graduate Research Fellow

Re: What can I infer from show ip route and similar BGP commands?

2014-12-08 Thread Reza Motamedi
Thanks Joel for your detailed explanation. It was very informative. I have been using routeviews for sometime, but given that I could get this amount of information from other sources, I decided to give this a try. On another note, do you think there is any value in checking the next hop IP? I