Yeap:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-02.txt
TCPM WGJ. Touch
Internet Draft USC/ISI
Obsoletes: 2385 A. Mankin
For instance, out of Australia we have a single, old cable going West out of
Perth to Singapore (SEA-ME-WE3) which allows only low speed circuits, but
we've got almost 4 (as of next year) cables going North and East out of
Sydney. So most Europe traffic to/from Australia is via the USA.
And 60 points off Cisco is possible, even for small shops with some
negotiating ability.
That's not our experience; it seems that BUs protecting margins talk
louder than the sales guys, so when it reaches discounts like that,
even because of lack of adequate product from Cisco (lower gear
This statement is patently false. The uRPF failures I dealt with were based
entirely on the recommended settings, and were confirmed by Cisco. Last I
heard (2 months ago) the problems remain. Cisco just isn't being honest
with you about them.
Would you mind telling us what is the scenario
2) Performance
[Note: we have no 10g interfaces, so I can only speak to a many-singleg-port
environment]
Much higher than Cisco. So good at dealing with traffic problems that we
have had multi-gig DoS attacks that we wouldn't have known about without
having an IDS running on a
Some broadband providers here in .br seems to be blocking access to
the dns-oarc.net test zone (but not to the portal site); most thought
it was intended behavior by those providers (hiding instead of
patching), but you are right, someone might have corrupted the test
zone itself, which aleviates
1) I've seen this behavior before; you are not alone in the universe.
2) Most likely there is a balanced channel on the path, either L3 or
L2, and one of the links in the bundle is dead but has not been
detected as such.
Rubens
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Matt Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo
