Hey!
New message, please read <http://alexanderandbrown.com/waiting.php?2fsb>
Scott Howard
Hey!
New message, please read <http://thc420.net/sweet.php?dqk>
Scott Howard
Hey!
New message, please read <http://gjstspt.com/paper.php?zhg>
Scott Howard
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn aa...@heyaaron.com
wrote:
If they can e-mail you your existing password (*cough*Netgear*cough*),
it means they are storing your credentials in the database
un-encrypted.
No, it doesn't mean that at all. It means they are storing it
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
Dear HP:
If your not going to support IPv6 can you at least not return SRVFAIL when
asked for an record:
They aren't. Your resolver is - or at least, that's what it looks like for
me.
Sending an query to their
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote:
You left out the authority section that refers you to the correct DNS
servers - ns[1-6].hp.com are not it. They delegate to another set of HP
servers, which all time out (as stated by the OP) when asked for .
Actually
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Franck Martin fmar...@linkedin.com wrote:
why does this list break DKIM when forwarding?
From the Gmail headers your email :
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com:
nanog-bounces+scott=example.com@nanog.orgdoes not designate
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
If the hardware (as has been suggested) or the OS does any of this, how do
diagnostic routine in or running under the OS work?
The OS does it, when allocating memory to userland programs.
For memory, before memory is
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:39 PM, TGLASSEY tglas...@earthlink.net wrote:
BAE did this cute poster on the attack model
https://image-store.slidesharecdn.com/6f0027d2-
c58c-11e3-af1f-12313d0148e5-original.jpeg?goback=%2Egde_1271127_member_
5862330295302262788
I'm guessing accuracy probably
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
Is the heartbleed bug not proof positive that it is not being done today?
On the contrary. Heartbleed is proof that memory IS cleared before being
assigned to a *process*. The data available via the vulnerability is
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Matthew Black matthew.bl...@csulb.eduwrote:
Seriously? When files are deleted, their sectors are simply released to
the free space pool without erasing their contents. Allocation of disk
sectors without clearing them gives users/programs access to file contents
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Niels Bakker niels=na...@bakker.netwrote:
At least one vendor, Akamai is helping out now:
http://marc.info/?l=openssl-usersm=139723710923076w=2
I hope other vendors will follow suit.
Although it appears they may now be regretting doing so...
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
DMARC hasn't cut down on yahoo spam so far. Yahoo's spam problem was
(is?) centered on account hijacks.
I just checked my spam folder for the past month.
Out of about 80 messages from Yahoo, I can see about 3 that went
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Matthias Leisi matth...@leisi.net
wrote:
They could have communicated, as in listen folks, we are going to make a
critical change that will affect mailing lists (etc...) in
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
wrote:
I applaud Akamai for trying, for being courageous enough to post code, and
for bucking the trend so many other companies are following by being more
secretive every year.
Just to be clear, so do I! As I said, the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
They could have made the change not late on a Friday afternoon (or well
into the weekend for most of the world).
On the weekend before tax filings are due in the US! And a couple of
days
before Passover.
and in
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
7-April: Monday, Yahoo's dmarc change kicks everyone in the groin, the
last full week before the US tax filing deadline.
The change was made on the previous Friday, so that date is largely
irrelevant.
7-April: OpenSSL's
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
7-April: OpenSSL's *public* advisory (after a full week of private
notifications, of which yahoo surely was one tech company in on the
early notifications)
Given that many of their main services were vulnerable
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/when-ipv6-will-be-fully-supportedwhich
then links to
http://digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/suggestions/2639897-ipv6-addressessays
it all, really...
Scott
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Bryan Socha
There was a lot of discussion about this figure back in August when the
relevant outage occurred.
From memory, a large percentage of the traffic drop was from other sites
breaking as a result of Google not being available. ie, a site completely
unrelated to Google, potentially being served by a
I've come across this error (or something very similar to it) before. I
can't remember the exact product, but it turned out to be a transparent
SMTP proxy somewhere in the path - possibly on a UTM firewall, but I could
be wrong about that part...
Not overly helpful I know, but might point you in
I've seen others reporting this elsewhere too, so it's clearly a problem at
Yahoo's end.
Someone on the mailops list reported that disabling TLS for
yahoodns.nethosts fixed the problem so it may be worth trying that.
Scott
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Adrian Minta adrian.mi...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
That's weird!
Missing akamai.net entry from the authoritative DNS nodes? I am in
Austria right now and so likely my nearby node giving bad replies.
akamai.net isn't missing from anywhere. www might be, but other
163.com (as well as 126.com which you don't have listed) is a bit of a
special case.
It's a Chinese site that offers free email address as well as a very
popular portal site - think of it as the Chinese equivalent to Yahoo or
Hotmail.
Whilst it's certainly true that a lot of spam originates from
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Nolan Rollo nro...@kw-corp.com wrote:
RFC draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00.txt states:
I think you mean an Expired RFC Draft from 2006 written by the people from
SORBS states :
Which finally brings me to my questions:
It seems like the unspoken
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Nolan Rollo nro...@kw-corp.com wrote:
So in the four examples below, 3 of them preface the IP with an alpha
character. Charter however, starts the rDNS off with a number. I'm not
arguing with anyone but what potential problems could that cause with DNS?
I'm
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Gary Baribault g...@baribault.net wrote:
The other difference is that Google tells you up front, LinkedIn
installed this out of the bleue without any real permissions. Of course
if this where an opt in thing, nobody would be opting in! Well, I never
did
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
but who would want to deal with such slime?
I dunno, it looks pretty legit to me!!
Domain Name.. theccie.com
Creation Date 2013-09-28
Registration Date 2013-09-28
Expiry Date.. 2014-09-28
To their (partial) credit they are also supporting a new email header :
Require-Recipient-Valid-Since:
via draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field
The idea of this header is that it will allow a sender to control that a
user will only receive an email if that email address was valid before a
It would appear there's something very unhealthy with your specific
nameservers regarding .au.
A direct email I sent you bounced (well, delayed warning) due to :
The error that the other server returned was:
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address sc...@doc.net.au does not resolve
That address
I've two 2 short outages to both Google Search and Google Mail/Apps over
the last 30 mins. Both cleared after a few minutes. For Search at least
it was returning a Google error page.
Comcast in the Bay Area.
Scott
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:29 PM, win...@team-metro.net wrote:
Hey guys,
You'd almost think this was a technology mailing list given some of the
answers... (ohh.. wait!)
How about this - the size of the Internet is just short of 3 billion.
That's the number of people that have access to it. To me, that's a far
more telling number than anything around IP address or
To paraphrase Douglas Adams...
The Internet is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly,
hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way
down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space!
Scott
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Sean
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
All that said: My back-of-the-envelope math says the Internet is order
of 1 exabyte/day, as defined by my own rules on what counts as the
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Justin Vocke justin.vo...@gmail.comwrote:
512-377-6827 was one of the numbers trying to get more information about
my
network and how they could help me.
Which appears to be http://www.siptrunksproviders.com/
Which in turns appears to be the same company as
Don't know about you, but when I log into my Comcast account I see :
*Note:enforcement of the 250GB data consumption threshold is currently
suspended
*
Even then, the 250GB only ever applied for the slower accounts.
Scott
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Grant Ridder
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
AfriNIC put these wonderful people on stage at the African Internet
Summit.
At least they are good enough to include the facts in their FAQ :
* 5 - Do business firms use open roots?*
*Nowadays, no, or they are not identified.
...@frozenfeline.netwrote:
Am I missing something, or is that purporting to be an IPv4 address
beginning with 478?
http://www.open-root.eu/about-open-root/how-to-install-an-open-root-website-69/
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San
Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's.
The nearest Frys to SF is about 30 miles away in Palo Alto.
Scott
No issues on Comcast cable in the bay area, either Comcast business or
Comcast home.
Scott
$ nslookup gmail.com 8.8.4.4
Server: 8.8.4.4
Address:8.8.4.4#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: gmail.com
Address: 74.125.239.149
Name: gmail.com
Address: 74.125.239.150
On
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
no you don't... the dreamhost example used the google ARIN allocation
2607:: this example uses the 2404 APNIC allocation.
note that this may still be 'wrong', but .. it's a different wrong. :)
But
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Constantine A. Murenin
muren...@gmail.comwrote:
Additionally, it seems like both yelp.com and retailmenot.com block
the whole 173.230.144.0/20 from their web-sites, returning some
graphical 403 Forbidden pages instead.
Although I have knowledge of either of
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Constantine A. Murenin
muren...@gmail.comwrote:
And at least in the US, I'm yet to encounter a complementary WiFi at
any hotel that would be doing JavaScript insertion, so I'm not sure
where you get your information that the free internet always means ads
or a
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
(Yes, yes, I'm well aware that many people will claim that *their* captchas
work. They're wrong, of course: their captchas are just as worthless
as everyone else's. They simply haven't been competently attacked yet.
And
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.comwrote:
Or ask me every time. Sites should not require cookies
just to look around. I get it if there's a transaction to
be made, but just to look? :-( Especially a site like RIPE!
Umm.. Before deciding what sites should
Working now, tested from 3 hosts on different networks on both 80 and 443 :
$ telnet wpa.one.microsoft.com 443
Trying 94.245.126.107...
Connected to wpa.one.microsoft.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
Scott
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Ben Carleton carle...@vanoc.net wrote:
-
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:07 AM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Really, this isn't hard to understand. Current SSL signers do no more
than tie the identity of the cert to the identity of a domain name. Anyone
who's been following the endless crisis at ICANN about bogus WHOIS knows
that
But only over HTTP. Working fine over HTTPS for me.
Scott
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Joshua Goldbard j...@2600hz.com wrote:
Http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/regions.com
Down.
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 26, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Positively Optimistic
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
I am getting NXDOMAIN for www.ipv6.facebook.com thus it likely is fully
gone now:
Same from here.
www.facebook.com is nicely at 2a03:2880:2050:1f01:face:b00c:: (which is
kinda scary as typically the lowest address is a
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
Guys seem to think that it's gender neutral. The majority of women are
used to this, but they have indicated to me that they don't believe it to
be very neutral. Using guys is not gender neutral, it's flat out implying
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.comwrote:
So...why do you need publicly routable IP addresses if they aren't
publicly routable?
Because doing anything else is Harmful! There's even an RFC that says so!
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1627 - Network 10
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
You don't lookup MX records for MX targets. This is basic MTA
processing.
If the MX lookup fails, as apposed to returns nodata, you don't
lookup the A/ records and synthesis a MX record. You treat it
as a soft error
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:
Routers are sometimes used on networks that don't have internet
connectivity [by design]. This seems amazingly short-sighted for a company
that's been around selling routing gear as long as cisco.
If the router is not
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.netwrote:
What if they said it would cause the generation of port-unreachable ICMP
packets to cease, and applications may hang until they timeout? Not the
answer you're looking for, but not wrong either.
Umm, yeah, it is
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
The NTP daemon could still provide a configuration option to not
implement leap-seconds locally, or ignore the leap-second
announcement received. So the admin can make a tradeoff favoring
Stability over Correctness, of
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Todd Underwood toddun...@gmail.comwrote:
This was not a cascading failure. It was a simple power outage
Cascading failures involve interdependencies among components.
Not always. Cascading failures can also occur when there is zero
dependency between
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, joseph.sny...@gmail.com wrote:
My biggest problem still is the multiple computer issue. I am on at least
3-5 physical computers and 1-20 virtual machines, and 2 cellphones a day.
I honestly do not want to store a database of passwords encrypted or not
on an
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Joel Maslak jmas...@antelope.net wrote:
That said, the purpose of CVV is to stop *one* type of fraud - it's to
stop a skimmer from being able to do mail-order/internet-order with your
card number. The CVV is not on the magnetic strip, so a skimmer installed
at
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Wayne E Bouchard w...@typo.org wrote:
The main weakness of CVV2 these days is form history in browsers.
(auto complete).
Any website requesting a CVV2 in a form field without the form
history/autocomplete being disabled is in breach of PCI compliance, and
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone must have something in a database that can easily derive the
CVV2 number;
There is no way to derive the CVV2 number. It is little more than a
random number assigned to the card.
otherwise there would be no way
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Timothy McGinnis mc...@isc.org wrote:
Dear Unnamed person at The SpaceMarket,
He appears to not be unnamed. Gmail links the user to the Google+
profile https://plus.google.com/116655492141266828122 under the name Dan
Cooper, and with a photo of another Dan
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Aftab Siddiqui aftab.siddi...@gmail.comwrote:
Blocking port/25 is a common practice (!= best practice) for home
users/consumers because it makes life a bit simpler in educating the end
user.
MAAWG have considered this a best practice for residential/dynamic
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Interesting... Most people I know run the same policy on 25 and 587 these
days...
to-local-domain, no auth needed.
relay, auth needed.
auth required == TLS required.
Anything else on either port seems not best practice
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:21 PM, McCall, Gabriel
gabriel.mcc...@thyssenkrupp.com wrote:
ActiveSync on Android allows corporate to force compliance with security
policy and allow remote wipe. User cannot complete the exchange account
setup without permitting the controls. If the user doesn't
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
the initial release date (not
actually shown in the that version as far as I can see, but it was around
the same time Google announced
This service has been discussed several times in the ~2 years since it was
first released (including topics such as why it's bad for CDNs)
The archives would be a good place to start...
Scott.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:12 PM, steve pirk [egrep] st...@pirk.com wrote:
I saw this in a post
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, steve pirk [egrep] st...@pirk.com wrote:
Awesome link Todd - Why did I think that the resolving server would already
know where network path wise the request came from. Let me post this as a
comment and ask how the CDN endpoint routing is working.
I would
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numbers) really isn't likely to do all
that much damage, even on the East Coast.
A 5.6 quake in Newcastle, Australia in 1989 caused, according to Wikipedia,
13 fatalities, 160 people
And it's over as of tomorrow night.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/08/20/verizon.strike/
Scott.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
As of midnight, 45,000 IBEW and CWA members are striking Verizon, as their
contract has expired.
In sort, wait... Once you're de-listed from SpamCop (which is owned by
IronPort and plays a non-trivial part in their SenderBase scoring) you
should find that your reputation increases fairly quickly - normally within
24 hours presuming that the spam has actually stopped.
Scott.
On Wed, Aug
Guessing some people here might be interested in this, but it seems to have
only been sent to APAC-based *NOGs...
Scott
-- Forwarded message --
From: Save Vocea save.vo...@icann.org
Date: Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:30 PM
Subject: [AusNOG] ICANN 41 - now underway
To:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:22:59PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.netwrote:
With IPv6, we are having some trouble coming up with a way to do this.
Since there is no NAT, does anyone have any ideas as to how this could be
accomplished?
Juniper, *BSD (including pfsense) and Linux all do NAT66
That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
which are defintely returning records for me :
$ dig +short www.facebook.com @glb1.facebook.com
2620:0:1c08:4000:face:b00c:0:3
Scott.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Nathanael C. Cariaga
nccari...@stluke.com.ph wrote:
ps. I'm just wondering why yahoo doesn't inform their users that the email
that they sent was blocked because of their servers were listed in a
blocklist (inspite that the server is able to return a correct
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:28 PM, andrew.wallace
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
*yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to be all *that* bad
Remember a wall of tsunami water travels in general at approx 970 kph (600
mph),
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.ukwrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/133-us-cities-now-run-their-own-broadband-networks.ars
Ars Technica has a short article up about the growth of municipal networks,
but principally a nice little 'hey
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:55 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
If the creation of .xxx is a preliminary step in making the fact of
your web site only being accessible by a name ending in .xxx an
affirmative defense against a charge of allowing minors to access your
site then
But do
It was unallocated a few days ago :
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-issued/2011-March/000807.html
Google will probably give you a fair idea why (the word botnet comes up a
lot!)
Scott
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:14 AM, mikea mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
I rise to expose my ignorance.
39/8 was assigned to APNIC in January, and realistically should have been
removed from any bogon lists at that time.
At this stage it appears they are still doing Resource Quality Assessment
on it and haven't actually carried out any assignments, but that in itself
is enough of a reason to make
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
In my neck of the woods, you can get a basic POTS line for $15/month if
it's important to you, local calls billed by the number of calls and the
normal LD charges. Add a basic DSL service to that ($20) AND add a basic
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
While I have a few WRT54G's lying around, I've never tried IPv6 on them,
and would find it interesting if anyone has.
I used a WRT54G running DD-WRT for some time with a HE IPv6 tunnel (now
replaced with a Cisco 877, but not
102/8 AfriNIC2011-02whois.afrinic.net ALLOCATED
103/8 APNIC 2011-02whois.apnic.net ALLOCATED
104/8 ARIN 2011-02whois.arin.netALLOCATED
179/8 LACNIC 2011-02whois.lacnic.net ALLOCATED
185/8 RIPE NCC 2011-02whois.ripe.netALLOCATED
The Windows Media stream was working for me (the others were giving the
database error), but it's all over now.
There's a press conference at 10:00am EST, but I'm not sure if it's going to
be webcast or not.
Scott.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Sameer Khosla skho...@neutraldata.comwrote:
From all accounts it will remain carrier neutral.
http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/01/28/verizon-terremark-will-remain-carrier-neutral/
Scott.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Ryan Finnesey
ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com wrote:
With Verizon acquiring Terremark does
From http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/011211-world-ipv6-day.html
Several of the Internet's most popular Web sites - including Facebook,
Google and Yahoo - have agreed to participate in the first global-scale
trial of IPv6, the long-anticipated upgrade to the Internet's main
communications
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ken Chase k...@sizone.org wrote:
I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their
own
servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
experiencing low levels of spam.
There's definitely been a drop-off in
http://www.google.com/search?q=nanog+126+64 would be a good place to
start...
(And I'm guessing you mean that /64 is awfully large, not /126)
Scott.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
SO I have been turning up v6 with multiple providers now and notice that
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:35 AM, iHate SORBS ihateso...@gmail.com wrote:
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand up and stop routing
dnsbl.sorbs.net until that time they can commit to making real changes.
What sort of changes are you suggesting? Suggesting a block unless they
make
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:
Some do. Anyone with control of a phone system with digital lines (i.e.
asterisk with PRI) can trivially set callerID to whatever they want. There
are perfectly legitimate, and not so legitimate uses for this.
You don't even
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:26 AM, N. Yaakov Ziskind aw...@ziskind.us wrote:
And, even if it *is* unreasonable, well, his network, his rules, right?
I block all SMTP traffic from IPV4 servers (clients?) which have odd
numbers in the third octet. might not be a good idea for a high volume
mail
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:24 PM, N. Yaakov Ziskind aw...@ziskind.us wrote:
Jon Lewis wrote (on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:44:02PM -0400):
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Reese wrote:
A friend brought this to my attention:
http://ipq.co/
And now FF blocks it as a reported attack page.
Bound to
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Roy r.engehau...@gmail.com wrote:
Why carry a laptop? Here are some examples
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Belkin-Mini-Notebook-Surge-Portector-with-Built-In-USB-Charger/10248165?sourceid=1503142050ci_src=14110944ci_sku=10248165
If you're looking at
Made it to Slashdot too -
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/05/10/0056228/The-Status-of-Routing-Reform-mdash-How-Fragile-is-the-Internet
As usual I wouldn't recommend reading the comments unless you want your eyes
to bleed...
Scott.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Franck Martin
Internap do not have an external Looking Glass (not sure about Route Server,
but I suspect it's the same).
If you're a customer their helpdesk will run traceroutes/etc from a specific
location if you ask, within reason of course...
Scott.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Max Clark
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, James Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
For someone who is a CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Whatever, etc, etc, etc,
you really should know how to use dig(1).
Certifications usually
No problems here on the western side of 101 with our ATT Opt-e-man.
That said, the majority of fiber in the Sunnyvale area is on the other side
of 101.
Scott
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Shon Elliott s...@unwiredbb.com wrote:
I heard there is a fiber outage in Sunnyvale that has taken
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Robert E. Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
We've seen great increases in CPU and memory speeds as well as disk
densities since the last maximum (March 2000). Speccing ECC memory is
a reasonable start, but this sort of thing has been a problem in the
past
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/apnic-talk/archive/2010/04/msg2.html
(There's also a PDF version with easier to enlarge images at
http://www.potaroo.net/studies/1slash8/1slash8.pdf )
Scott.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address
The IEEE expects the MAC-48 space to be exhausted no sooner than the year
2100[3]; EUI-64s are not expected to run out in the foreseeable future.
And this is what happens
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
