Re: Cisco ISE

There are other products out there that give more successful results much quicker and with much less effort. While I won’t spam the list with things, I’d be happy to share my experience off-list if desired. Scott -Original Message- From: NANOG on behalf of

Re: Clueful BGP from TW-Telecom/L3

how those are treated along the way. I just don’t understand how customer support can be such a difficult thing. Scott From: Micah Croff <micahcr...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 6:21 PM To: Scott Morris <s...@emanon.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nan

Clueful BGP from TW-Telecom/L3

Is there per chance anyone hanging on here who is clueful about BGP working with TW-Telecom and the recent integration with Level3 I have a client that I consult with whose route is not getting sent from TW to L3 and the techs on the case are convinced we need to put different BGP

Clueful BGP from TW-Telecom/L3

Is there per chance anyone hanging on here who is clueful about BGP working with TW-Telecom and the recent integration with Level3 I have a client that I consult with whose route is not getting sent from TW to L3 and the techs on the case are convinced we need to put different BGP

Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...

Shop class can also teach you how to turn a wrench. How many people out of that area go on to be the best mechanics you¹ve ever seen? Some do, some don¹t. Certifications aren¹t any different. They are around to establish a benchmark of minimally qualified knowledge. We all should know the

Re: How our young colleagues are being educated....

All networking courses SHOULD have some version of binary in them. Too many things rely on it to be skipped. Yes, in the real world we have shortcuts. But when those shortcuts become the only thing everyone knows, bad things may be left to happen. Besides, if one can¹t do binary, how can they

Re: Cisco CCNA Training

To: Scott Morris s...@emanon.com Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Cisco CCNA Training Does CBT or any of these other subscription based learning courses include a Cisco IOS simulator so we don't have to buy a Cisco lab or equipment? On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Scott Morris s

Re: Cisco CCNA Training

Depends on how quickly you want them trained, and how they tend to learn thingsŠ Reading is good, but can be boring and tedious and not always have all the answers. Standard ILT can be costly, but very quick and often standard (though I¹d shop around for who you have as an instructor since that

Re: BGP Session

Fundamental routing training would greatly help you here. I would suggest looking for that. If you are not peering with TATA, then your routes would not go to TATA first. (unless the next-hop is indirect and that brings up other fundamental routing things that you should learn about) AS13335

Re: How to catch a cracker in the US?

And if they were the intended application of the term, I would think that “cheese” would not the the appropriate choice to catch them. However, cheese and crackers would seem to be more a snack, which is at least how I interpreted that original comment. Perhaps I need to drink more… Scott

Verizon Wireless network contact?

If there's anyone from the IP-side of Verizon Wireless, if you could contact me off-list, that would be awesome! Saves me hours of pointless phone calls. :) Thanks! -- *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Data Center, CCNP-Voice

Re: ISIS and OSPF together

Re: Color vision for network techs

The ADA act does not allow people to have access to every single job regardless of their handicap. So, if something requires the ability to see certain colors, then that's a requirement. Scott On 8/31/12 10:30 AM, Philip Gladwin wrote: Maybe giving them access to a colormeter? :)

Re: Fiji Islands

Hell... who needs help doing any sort of work over there??? I'd love to find a way to bind work and vacation spots together! :) Scott Twitter: @ScottMorrisCCIE E-mail: s...@emanon.com Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard and be Eeeevl.. On 7/31/12 4:14 PM, Philip

Re: Attack on UDP 101

A packet doesn't make a loop. A device would create that. So if you are sending the packet out, but something else is sending it back, I'd go take a look at where that's occurring on your devices. If you disconnected the user in question, then what else has either taken over that address, or

Re: using reserved IPv6 space

On 7/15/12 5:38 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: On 2012-07-15 00:45, Tony Hain wrote: There is no difference in the local filtering function, but *IF* all transit providers put FC00::/7 in bogon space and filter it at every border, there is a clear benefit when someone fat-fingers the config

Re: using reserved IPv6 space

On 7/15/12 11:58 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: On 2012-07-15 15:30, Scott Morris wrote: There was also in the past fec0::/10. For BGP updates you should be safe to filter out FC00::/6. Unless I've missed something, RFC4193 lays out FC00::/7, not the /6. So while FE00::/7 may yet

BGP Clueful at Reliance Globalcom?

Can someone from Reliance Globalcom who is clueful on their BGP operations please contact me offlist? I appreciate it! -- *Scott Morris* s...@emanon.com Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard and be Eeeevl..

Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support

Hell, years ago, I only wanted to add three bits and give a set to each continent with one leftover for the United Federation of Planets (and Antarctica really didn't need one anyway)... I was told that would be geographically discriminating! :) Ah well, c'est la vie!Why be lazy when we can

Re: Flapping POS Interface on Frame-relay between a Juniper and Cisco

Re: Flapping POS Interface on Frame-relay between a Juniper and Cisco

The mismatch problem of DCE/DTE should definitely indicate that your PVCs aren't up. But that shouldn't result in the high quantity of CRC errors in the interface counters. That should just result in your LMI enquiry count increasing with LMI response sitting at zero. I have to say I've never

Re: ouch..

Now just where would the fun in THAT be? ;) Scott On 9/14/11 11:00 AM, James Jones wrote: Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote: -Original Message-

Re: New Natural Disaster! 8/27/2011 Hurricane Irene

Re: New Natural Disaster! 8/27/2011 Hurricane Irene

Did you have backup tomatoes? On 8/26/11 10:05 PM, Chris wrote: Irene is already past me. I'm outside of Jacksonville, Florida by the coast. Irene snapped my tomato plant in half overnight Wednesday.

Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011

Also, the quake on the east coast was much closer to the surface than most west coast quakes, which could account for the feeling. Scott (not a geologist) On 8/23/11 6:13 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen

Re: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011

Re: OSPF vs IS-IS

On 8/17/11 9:50 AM, Randy Bush wrote: What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already has good experience with OSPF? what would you rather rely on at three in the morning when things are breaking, someone

Re: OSPF vs IS-IS

Re: OSPF vs IS-IS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The learning curve isn't that big IMHO. However, it's all about comfort. You should never design a network because someone else does it this way. While you can certainly take ideas into account about the WHY their network looks that way, you need

Re: NANOGers home data centers - What's in your closet?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I still get out plenty, thanks! :) It's been years in the making, and more than served its purpose! But convenient to have... And heats the home nicely in the wintertime! And someone said it was all about the toys! Scott On 8/12/11 8:29 PM,

Re: Cablevision's company line on IPv6 to the home

Since IPv6 is like a frozen turkey Just make sure they remember to take the giblets out... Based on personal... u... experience... that will drastically change when something (if ever) gets done! ;) Scott On 5/28/11 4:21 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote: I just got off the phone with a level

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner? I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;) Scott On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote: I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

Isn't that what the uvula is for? Oh... never mind wrong swallow. ;) On 4/2/11 3:34 AM, Chad Dailey wrote: Swallows have MTU issues. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote: On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

Random re-encapsulation. Now there's an interesting protocol! On 4/2/11 3:53 AM, Brandon Ross wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: Not true. The occupants of the aircraft survived. The aircraft did not. Hm, in my recollection the payload made it to the

Re: IPv4 address shortage? Really?

It would be a lot easier to do it by continent. 3 bits at prepend. We only have 7 of those and Antarctica likely doesn't need several billion addresses anyway. Got some leftover for the United Federation of Planets. :) (or whatever other semi-practical use that may be dreamed up) You could

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 36, Issue 141

So Do you run a small network? Or are there LOTS of EX-girlfriends? ;) Scott On 1/27/11 5:30 AM, Ivan Brunello wrote: Message: 10 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:11:46 -0500 From: Christopher cal...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Network Naming To: nanog@nanog.org Message-ID:

Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

The catch is being able to do it without reloading! commit confirm will help a lot as well. In case your commit annihilates your ssh session. ;) Scott On 1/13/11 2:51 PM, Jack Bates wrote: On 1/13/2011 1:48 PM, Michael Ruiz wrote: Yeah another thing I love about the JUNOS is the rollback

Re: Fw: Cisco Sanitization

Or why not just paste a REALLY large bogus config in there to max-out the NVRAM chip? That's the one that's harder to move to a PC. On the flash, moving to a PC is easier (at least if we're talking about newer devices using PCMCIA!) :) I suppose that everyone's level of detail is somewhat

Re: Modify BGP AS Path

Well, you could always aggregate them (even same prefix) in your own ASN and that would generate a fresh version of the route... Scott On 12/31/10 9:34 AM, Tarig Ahmed wrote: Dear all Hi Is there any way to change AS Path no prepend. I am in a situation needs some

Re: Modify BGP AS Path

No worries. Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER [1]...@emanon.com Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard and be Eeeevl.. On 12/31/10

Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons

Size doesn't matter. It's how well you use it. Route it, baby... ;) On 12/21/10 1:56 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote: A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different

Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet.

On 12/4/10 5:56 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: I recently calculated the capacity of a 747F full of LTO-4 tapes; it's about 8.7 exabytes. I *think* it's within weight and balance for the airframe. Cheers, -- jra Just how much free time do you have? :) Scott

Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming

Given that a meal is often comprised of several mouthfuls, wouldn't it stand to reason that the entire address would suffice there? ;) Scott On 11/19/10 11:06 AM, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 14:14, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com wrote: If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits

Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming

If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful. ;) Scott On 11/18/10 10:45 PM, George Bonser wrote: Hi all, as most of you are aware, there is no definite, canonical name for the two bytes of IPv6 addresses between colons. This forces people to use a description like I just did

Re: RIP Justification

whereas OSPF does) and you may have your justification. If it's for nostalgia or just because, then I'd say everyone agrees that RIP has passed its usefulness! Scott On 9/29/10 11:32 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote: On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scott Morris wrote: But anything, ask why you are using

Re: RIP Justification

On 9/30/10 12:57 AM, Mark Smith wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:13:11 +1000 Julien Goodwin [1]na...@studio442.com.au wrote: On 30/09/10 13:42, Mark Smith wrote: One of the large delays you see in OSPF is election of the designated router on multi-access links such as ethernets. As ethernet is

Re: RIP Justification

Maybe I WAY under-read the initial poster's question, but I was pretty sure he wasn't talking about running it as a CORE routing protocol or anything on the middle of their network where MPLS would be expected on top of it! If I missed it and he did intend that, then I'd certainly agree with you

Re: RIP Justification

I think you're right that everything has its' place. But you gotta know where that is and why you choose it! RIP(v2) is great in that there aren't neighbor relationships, so you can shoot routes around in a semi-sane-haphazard fashion if need be. Whatever your reality you exist in like

Re: POS to Ethernet Converter

They're called routers. ;) Otherwise, your framing is completely different between those mediums, so it's not like going from 100Base-FX ethernet to 100Base-TX ethernet! HTH, Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153

Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways

Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and corporate compliance offices and professional whiners. Scott John Peach wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:00:45 -0500 Tim Sanderson [1]t...@donet.com wrote: [snip] THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR PERSONAL AND

Re: CRS-3

It only supported IPv5. :) Scott [1]deles...@gmail.com wrote: What happened to CRS-2? :) --Original Message-- From: Robert Enger - NANOG To: David Hubbard Cc: [2]na...@nanog.org Subject: Re: CRS-3 Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a

Re: Default route with object tracking

I think that good is all relative to what you are most likely to be able to reach from wherever your location happens to be! Google's... Level 3's. Root DNS servers (anycast) Pick something. Scott Curtis Maurand wrote: I'd rather send him to something more open like kernel.org;

Re: d000::/8 from AS28716

To be honest, when I figured a big BUNCH of d000 was going to hit the Internet, I did not expect it to come from Italy.;) Chuck Anderson wrote: Anyone know why this ISP from Italy is advertising d000::/8 to the IPv6 Internet? show route d000::/8 inet6.0: 2446 destinations, 5143

Re: IGMP and PIM protection

So we're looking to complicate things for the same of complicating them? Using a predictable security doesn't exactly make things secure does it? On the links that you are running PIM or IGMP on, do you not have a predictable set of clients and therefore problems? Or are we trying to protect

Re: IGMP and PIM protection

But IGMP IS the control traffic with users. And PIM IS the control traffic between multicast routers. ? Scott Glen Kent wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Dec 23, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Glen Kent wrote: Any idea if folks use AH or ESP

Re: qos 3560

Look at show mls qos map to see the defaults that may be rewriting your information depending on trust (or non-trust) mechanisms you have configured. If you trust CoS, a frame received with cos5 and dscp46 will get rewritten to dscp 40 with default maps... show mls qos interface (intf) is also

Re: ISP customer assignments

No idea, I haven't looked at that stuff in a while. But I would assume so, as it's easier to build a foundation than jumping straight to something difficult? Or did you learn calculus in grade school? Just askin' ;) Scott Mark Newton wrote: On 13/10/2009, at 2:02 PM, Scott Morris wrote

Re: ISP customer assignments

set of experiences to go with it as the poster from APNIC pointed out. Just my two cents, Scott Joe Abley wrote: On 2009-10-13, at 07:39, Scott Morris wrote: No idea, I haven't looked at that stuff in a while. But I would assume so, as it's easier to build a foundation than jumping

Re: ISP customer assignments

, there's some initial rhyme and reason. Explaining that, getting buy in, and understanding the limitations therein will make the next progression to VLSM simpler to grasp. At least in my opinion. :) Scott Joe Abley wrote: On 2009-10-13, at 08:05, Scott Morris wrote: While I may agree that teaching

Re: ISP customer assignments

That was the point. :) Scott Matthew Petach wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com mailto:s...@emanon.com wrote: How many addresses do you like on point-to-point circuits? Scott I allocate a /64, but currently I configure only a /127 subnet

Re: ISP customer assignments

While entirely possible, I actually view it going the other way. RFC 3627 points out some nice issues as far as DAD and anycast operation is concerned, but what I'd see (just my random opinion as I haven't bothered to write an RFC) is that it would make entirely much more sense to come up with a

Re: ISP customer assignments

I'm going to have to pull the mixed-hat on this one. If you are comparing this to a true academia environment, I'd agree with you. Too much theory, not enough reality in things. However, I've yet to see the part about where the person is being trained from. I happen to train people at CCIE

Re: Does Internet Speed Vary by Season?

I may be having my wires a little crossed (I'm not an electrical engineer) but I was always under the impression that manipulation of the physical characteristics like that from heat/dampness didn't reduce the speed but the quality (like line noise/errors/etc) of the line. Whether old telco lines

Re: Ready to get your federal computer license?

I must have missed the phrasing that says nobody else can make an independent decision regarding any security measure above and beyond the minimum standards... I'll go back and look for that. Scott Florian Weimer wrote: * Scott Morris: I'm trying really hard to find my paranoia hat

Re: Ready to get your federal computer license?

I'm trying really hard to find my paranoia hat, and just to relieve some boredom I read the entire bill to try to figure out where this was all coming from (2) may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal

Re: In a bit of bind...

May seem a little simplistic, but how about Webmin. :) Runs on most linux-type systems over SSL/https and allows you to administer your DNS (and other services) without issues and provide the things you listed below. Oh, and it's free. And it's already done. Scott Ben Matthew wrote:

RE: ? how cisco router handle the out-of-order ICMP echo-reply packets

There aren't sequence numbers with ICMP. And the timeout value is watched/triggered before the next ICMP is sent, so there shouldn't really be any ordering problem/interpretation anyway. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Zhao Ping [mailto:pzhao...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January

RE: ? how cisco router handle the out-of-order ICMP echo-reply packets

[mailto:st...@ibctech.ca] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:52 AM To: s...@emanon.com Cc: 'Zhao Ping'; na...@merit.edu Subject: Re: ? how cisco router handle the out-of-order ICMP echo-reply packets Scott Morris wrote: There aren't sequence numbers with ICMP. And the timeout value is watched

RE: Christmas spam from RESERVED IANA adressblock ?

Do you put public IP addresses on every single device of yours? Or are some devices configured with private ranges for internal movement (public bridghead e-mail vs. internal databases?) Or is everything internal private, and you simply NAT for public accessible parts. Seeing those addresses in

RE: What is the most standard subnet length on internet

In case anyone cares... From my router's perspective: /1 0 /2 0 /3 0 /4 0 /5 0 /6 0 /7 0 /8 20 /9 9 /10 20 /11 53 /12 159 /13 310 /14 560 /15 1,096 /16 10,235 /17 4,461 /18 7,593 /19 16,284 /20 19,075 /21

RE: an over-the-top data center

It's the double-dog-dare. :) Scott -Original Message- From: Craig Holland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 11:42 AM To: Måns Nilsson; Steven M. Bellovin; NANOG Subject: Re: an over-the-top data center Just me, or is showing the floorplan not the typical

RE: Potential Prefix Hijack

I sent e-mails to the AS contacts, but don't expect that to do much in the middle of the night.No live person at the phone numbers.I can't even get their web site to come up, although if they're re-routing the entire BGP table internally, go figure. :) BGPMon's a great thing though!

BGP Clueful from Windstream/Alltel? (Resend-addendum)

, but if you could contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] that will be much easier! Any emails to the subscribed address here won't work, which is the problem I'm attempting to solve with Windstream! :) Thanks in advance! Scott Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BGP Clueful from Windstream/Alltel?

! Scott Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: AS 54271

Wouldn't it be better to ask the folks in Hungary (AS20922) who are peering with this site? One side, I'd buy the typo. Both sides, mutual typos are a little more difficult. Not that conspiracy theories are all that much fun, but I'm finding the one-sided mistake hard to believe. Either that

RE: Splitting ARIN assignment

As long as your upstreams/partners are cool with that, there is no related designation between how addresses are allocated versus how they are announced. In other words, TECHNICALLY you could advertise a whole bunch of /30's You just run the risk of being filtered and/or ridiculed along the