Re: Software router state of the art

Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Andrew D Kirch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'd like to be wrong, but there's no way that any PC/Commodity routing system is going to work (in any environment other than Ethernet). For the small ISP starting out (you know, the ones selling T1's/xDSL), there

Re: Managed, cheap, DC power switches

switches only accept rev B modules; I have a new-ish switch that won't accept a pile of Finisar optics that did work in older HP switches. I don't know what the difference between rev B and older ones are, though. -- Seth Mattinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roller Network LLC

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

Sean Figgins wrote: Now, I have a question about this... Is the customer using the sites for redundancy, and will have both upstream providers in each site? Honestly, a small operation like this may be better served by multiple connections to the same provider. Such a setup can usually be

SMTP addresses in

I'm having a bit of an argument with a customer over the command syntax in RFC 2821 that shows command arguments for MAIL/RCPT commands in brackets, i.e.: Path = [ A-d-l : ] Mailbox Mailbox = Local-part @ Domain Our mail servers reject connections that don't follow the RFC. Am I wrong to

Re: windows update cache

Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote: Great if you're running a windows IT type LAN; crap if you're running an ISP! Why? It talks TCP/IP. How's it find the WSUS server again? Key Name: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate Value 0 Name

<    2   3   4   5   6   7