won't see it at all if
you are peering with a Juniper unless it is specifically configured to
send these looped routes with advertise-peer-as, or change the AS
number with as-override.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:32:34PM +0800, Song Li wrote:
Hi Joel,
It is right that the BGP route containing
the command on your Juniper and find such routes, could you please
provider them for us?
Thanks!
Regards!
Song
在 2015/1/28 16:23, joel jaeggli 写道:
On 1/27/15 5:45 AM, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently I studied the BGP AS path looping problem, and found that in
most cases, the received BGP
not Juniper.
Thanks!
Regards!
Song
在 2015/1/28 16:23, joel jaeggli 写道:
On 1/27/15 5:45 AM, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently I studied the BGP AS path looping problem, and found that in
most cases, the received BGP routes containing local AS# are suspicious.
However, we checked our BGP routing
not
found such routes in Adj-RIB-In.
We believe that the received BGP routes containing local AS# are related
to BGP security problem. Hence, we want to look for some real cases in
the wild. Could anybody give us some examples of such routes?
Thanks!
Best Regards!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT
, Song Li refresh.ls...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am curious about the AS loops in the AS-path. I think there should be a
very, very few received BGP routes that contain the local AS#. But because
such routes will be dropped and not installed in Loc-RIB, I want to know if
there is a command
containing AS loops (in cisco or juniper router). Does anybody know?
Thanks!
Best!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT Building,
Network Security,
Department of Electronic Engineering,
Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Tel:( +86) 010-62446440
E-mail: refresh.ls...@gmail.com
pop the
announcement originated from which is rather useful. other's like the
one above do tell you something about the policy of somebody on the
internet. you can also tell who strips communities...
On 1/7/15 5:35 AM, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
Today when I check one route in Routeviews I find
in the community of this route?
Thanks!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT Building,
Network Security,
Department of Electronic Engineering,
Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Tel:( +86) 010-62446440
E-mail: refresh.ls...@gmail.com
/index.html
but they do not contain the AS# of the IXP. Can anybody help me?
Thanks!
Best!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT Building,
Network Security,
Department of Electronic Engineering,
Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Tel:( +86) 010-62446440
E-mail: refresh.ls...@gmail.com
they should not appear in the
AS-Path, hence i want to filter out them.
Best!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT Building,
Network Security,
Department of Electronic Engineering,
Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Tel:( +86) 010-62446440
E-mail: refresh.ls...@gmail.com
Hi everyone,
I have a question about bgp updates:
BGP uses an incremental update strategy to conserve bandwidth and
processing power. That is, after initial exchange of complete routing
information, a pair of BGP routers exchanges only the changes to that
information. ( from RFC4274)
is:
If I am ISP, can I announce the same bogon prefix(172.116.0.0/24) with
AS7018 announced? Will this result in prefix hijacking?
Thanks!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT Building,
Network Security,
Department of Electronic Engineering,
Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Tel:( +86) 010
will remain 16.1/16(5).
I simulated this case in GNS3, and only got the first kind of result, i
don't know why?
Song
于 2014/5/6 18:13, ISP Services 写道:
Hi Song Li,
As far as I know there are 2 mechanisms that should prevent this
situation you describe from happening:
- Not advertising
it will select 16.1/16(2 4 5).
in this case, AS1 and AS3 select each other as the best route to AS5, i
wonder which route will be the final best route after bgp convergence in
AS1 and AS3.
Thanks!
--
Song Li
Room 4-204, FIT Building,
Network Security,
Department of Electronic Engineering
Thanks. I'm doing some research on route leaks, you are a great help to me.
Sky li
On Friday, February 21, 2014 08:57:07 AM Song Li wrote:
the AS relationship between AS1 and AS2/3 is peer, and
AS1 cannot announce routes from AS3 to provider1 by
rule.
Or even Peer-AS2's routes to Peer-AS3
Hi everyone,
I have one simple question: as for AS relationship, should customer tell
its provider the AS# of its own customers, or the provider have the
right to require its customers to do that?
Thanks!
--
Sky Li
Thanks. In order to prevent route leaking, this imformation should be
provided to providers.
but another question, should the AS relationships between customer and
its other neighbors (downstrem/peer/another provider) be private?
--
Sky Li
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 08:09:35 PM
+--+ +-+
| provider1| |provider2|
+--+ +-+
^ ^
| |
| |
++ ++---+++--+
|peer
18 matches
Mail list logo