On 04.08.2016 21:39, Andrew wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I work for a medium sized ISP. We are entering an agreement to rent
> some IPv4 space from a local higher education institution. Being a
> multi-homed ISP we would like to advertise the rented prefix from our
> ASN. The prefix that will be
There is no way to avoid breaking MTU for IPv4 but use PMTUD for IPv6,
is there? Meaning to stick to 1500 for IPv4 and use something larger for
IPv6?
Kind regards,
Stefan
On 09.03.2016 15:59, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> The adoption of jumbo frames in a IXP doesn't brake IPv4.
Then they might want to show an official MD5/SHA1 on their website for
the media. Or maybe simply offer a torrent/magnet-link ...
Kind regards,
Stefan
On 30.07.2015 15:19, STARNES, CURTIS wrote:
Not sure about distributing but I would think it would be ok since it is an
ISO for upgrading and
Time to teach home-routers WPA Enterprise auth? Then at least you know
whom to blame :-) and just one user to disconnect instead of everybody
who previously had the key.
Well, but if friends were to share your wifi-key through other ways
the end-result would be the same. Just hand your key to
Am 25.06.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Christopher Morrow:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Marco Davids mdav...@forfun.net wrote:
Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
geolocation is hard :(
geolocation is a broken concept anyway :-(
Similar to like being allowed by law to only offer some downloads
Of course it's not something you should generalise about all people or
all traffic from certain countries. But it's obvious that there are some
countries which seem to care almost not at all about abuse or maybe even
are sources for planned hack-attempts. And at least some large ISPs
there seem to
On 04/02/2015 09:57 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 2/Apr/15 09:52, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Of course it's not something you should generalise about all people or
all traffic from certain countries. But it's obvious that there are some
countries which seem to care almost not at all about abuse
On 01/24/2014 09:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number
really supportable?
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
In the interview they are saying that if Google is down, lots of people
don't have
On 01/24/2014 09:46 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:22:58 +0100, Stefan Neufeind said:
just no Youtube. Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides
being lazy in configuring a proper resolver-address.
A lot of people make value judgements on the relative
On 08/08/2012 09:37 AM, Oliver wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2012 01:08:24 Anurag Bhatia wrote:
router bgp 54456
bgp router-id 199.116.78.28
redistribute connected metric 1
redistribute static metric 1
neighbor 2607:1b00:10:a::1 remote-as 54456
neighbor 2607:1b00:10:a::1 next-hop-self
On 03/30/2012 08:21 PM, Raphael MAUNIER wrote:
This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all the
people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their
information on their peering.
[...]
You have to give them information twice a year
Well, then for a
11 matches
Mail list logo
