On 03/02/2015 02:19 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
Truth is, once the user is achieving what they consider to be acceptable
performance they don't care if it is symmetric
On 02/27/2015 04:11 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Daniel,
50MB/s might be tough to fill, but even at home I can get good use out of
the odd 25MB/s upstream burst for a few minutes.
Which would you choose, 50/50 or 75/25? My point is not that upstream
speed isn't valuable, but merely that demand for
Scott,
Maybe if it the upstream bandwidth was there would be more applications to use
it. I know it is a real
pain to upload pics to Facebook, etc on my 1mbs uplink, or move things to work
across my VPN.
Steve
On 02/27/2015 02:30 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Daniel,
Well, I wouldn't call using
On 04/22/2014 01:30 PM, Paul WALL wrote:
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Henning Brauer hb-na...@bsws.de wrote:
I won't waste time on your uninformed ramblings, you have the facts
plain wrong. There is enough material on the net for everybody to read
up on what happened.
carp causing outages
According to the changelog it cvs is fixed now.
$ rpm -qa|grep openssl
openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64
Tue Apr 8 12:17:25 EDT 2014
Z643357:~
$ rpm -q --changelog openssl | less
* Mon Apr 07 2014 Tomás( Mráz tm...@redhat.com 1.0.1e-16.7
- fix CVE-2014-0160
On 02/20/2014 08:57 AM, Pavel Zeleny wrote:
Masataka Ohta mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp writes:
Joe Maimon wrote:
What is the purpose of this?
...
Masataka Ohta
Hi guys,
for a second, have you any clue how to block this traffic on DNS
On 11/30/2012 09:45 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
I'll see your disagree and raise you another ;-)
I would say you almost never want to store addresses as character data
unless the only thing you're using them for is logging (even then it's
questionable). I run into people who do this all the time and
On 06/06/2012 03:05 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It is because of IEEE EUI-64 standard.
It was believed at the time of IPv6 development that EUI-48 would run out of
numbers and IEEE had proposed going to EUI-64. While IEEE still hasn't
quite made that change (though Firewire does appear to use EUI-64
On 04/20/2012 08:17 AM, Tei wrote:
It would be a very fast dictionary attack :D
accede
bade
dad
decade
face
axed
babe
deaf
bed
Abe
bee
Decca
exec
fade
bead
bedded
deed
exceed
Abba
deface
efface
feed
On 20 April 2012 09:08, Fernando Gontferna...@gont.com.ar wrote:
FYI
Original
I agree with this 100%.
Having worked with many people over the last 40 years, the good trouble
shooters understood how things
were suppose to work. This helps immeasurably in determining where to start
looking.
On 02/17/2012 10:12 AM, Mario Eirea wrote:
Well, I will argue this. I think the
On 01/20/2012 10:53 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Leo Bicknellbickn...@ufp.org said:
To suggest Netflow is more accurate than rrdtool seems rather strange
to me. It can be as accurate, but is not the way most people
deploy it.
Comparing Netflow to RRDTool is comparing apples to
Hello,
I have a SIXXS ipv6 tunnel that terminates in Ashburn, Va.
I have two HE ipv6 tunnels, one terminates in Dallas the other
terminate in Ashburn. I can ping each endpoint of the tunnels that terminate
in Ashburn, but I can't ping between the SIXXS and HE with the HE termination
in Dallas.
On 12/20/2011 12:12 PM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 12/20/11 06:33, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-12-20 15:17 , Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
I have a SIXXS ipv6 tunnel that terminates in Ashburn, Va.
I have two HE ipv6 tunnels, one terminates in Dallas the other
terminate in Ashburn. I can ping
On 11/09/2011 11:40 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-11-09 17:32 , Brzozowski, John wrote:
Update from http://www.comcast6.net
IPv6 Pilot Market Deployment Begins
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Comcast has started our first pilot market deployment of IPv6...
Congrats! One step closer to full
On 09/20/2011 03:06 PM, Chris Brookes wrote:
Anyone else seeing a lot of latency to google via qwest?
..
11 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms min-edge-12.inet.qwest.net [207.225.128.1]
1215 ms13 ms12 ms chx-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.38.5]
1312 ms21 ms13 ms 72.14.214.78
On 06/10/2011 09:37 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
You really didn't just write an entire post saying that RA is bad
because if a moron of a network engineer plugs an incorrectly
configured device into a production network it may cause problems, did
you?
You are the moron - this stuff happens and
On 06/09/2011 06:21 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:55:44AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
Respectfully, RAS, I disagree. I think there's a big difference
between being utterly unwilling to resolve the situation by peering
and merely refusing to purchase transit to a
On 05/31/2011 05:31 PM, Voll, Toivo wrote:
Going to http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ipv6/ and hitting Start IPv6 Test I
get:
Your system will continue to work for you on World IPv6 day. However, we found that
your server only supports IPv4 at this time. You'll simply continue to use IPv4 to
On 05/17/2011 08:56 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:07:17 +0200
From: Mans Nilssonmansa...@besserwisser.org
... It's not like you can even reach anything at home now, let alone
reach it by name.
that must and will change. let's be the generation who makes it possible.
I'd
On 04/15/2011 09:25 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
I've had it done in places where I work where you'll have 3 rotations
working 12 hour shifts.
In a 2 week pay period they get their 80 hours in a blend 36 one week
and 44 the next. It gives some nice consecutive days off time which
also doubles as a
20 matches
Mail list logo
