On 08/05/15 11:58, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:
I've seen the same over here and also considered it weird.
It looks exactly like the the DMARC senders treatment - I think there's
something wiggy and everyone is being treated as a DMARC encumbered sender.
On 13/03/15 10:20, Jason Iannone wrote:
There was once a fairly common saying attributed to an early
networking pioneer that went something like, be generous in what you
accept, and send only the stuff that should be sent. Does anyone
know what I'm talking about or who said it?
Jon
On 24/11/14 13:41, Brian Henson wrote:
Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
Over on [dns-operations]:
On 24/11/14 13:38, Brad Volz wrote:
The craigslist account at one of our
On 15/01/14 10:06, Brandon Applegate wrote:
Off-list replies are fine to minimize noise, and if there is an answer
or any meaningful correlation I will reply on-list. Thanks in advance
for any info/feedback.
I have been running into these a lot also and have so far concluded that
it is an
On 10/10/13 03:30, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Yet, apparently, Google has very recently completely stopped accepting
email with no PTR records.
They also don't try very hard to get the PTR record. If the packet is
lost, has a routing issue, or a DDoS prevents reliable access to the
name
On 03/07/13 11:12, Scott Weeks wrote:
As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City
Do they have DNSSEC from inception? It would seem a sensible thing to do
for a virgin TLD.
On 09/06/12 05:48, Michael Thomas wrote:
Linkedin has a blog post that ends with this sage advice:
* Make sure you update your password on LinkedIn (and any site that you
visit on the Web) at least once every few months.
I have accounts at probably 100's of sites. Am I to understand that
On 09/03/12 09:40, Matthew Huff wrote:
Just got an email today to our account associated with our legacy
ARIN address space. A firm Precision Management of Texas is
interested in subleasing some of our IP space for on-demand
solutions for brand marketers and website promotion chiefly through
On 14/09/11 13:44, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Jima na...@jima.tk wrote:
Huh? I'm a bit lost here, since I had two StartSSL certs issued yesterday
afternoon.
orly? wierd, they made a press release ~last-june (I think?) stating
they were stopping issuance
On 13/09/11 01:12, Randy Bush wrote:
as eliot pointed out, to defeat dane as currently written, you would
have to compromise dnssec at the same time as you compromised the CA at
the same time as you ran the mitm. i.e. it _adds_ dnssec assurance to
CA trust.
Yes, I saw that. It also drives up
On 04/01/11 04:04, Ken Chase wrote:
I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their own
servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
experiencing low levels of spam.
Connection and rejection counts have been going bonkers of late for
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 01:04 -0500, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
Spam-watch.com
From the website:
About Spam-watch - This list is meant as a replacement for the SPAM-L
list which was abruptly shut down in May 2009.
On the contrary - Spam-l.com continues on different hosting with
different
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 23:22 -0400, Eric Carroll wrote:
On 10-04-21 06:59 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
The url redirects to a Canadian med site.
Just FYI, it's not a real Canadian med site. It is high probability
not
even Canadian.
Posting so many URLs which either are or should be listed in
Quinn Kuzmich wrote:
lol WHAT
I can honestly say of all the emails I could have imagined to get from
NANOG, this was not one of them.
I'm trying to figure out why the FBI is trying to smuggle $8 million in
terrorist funds to me through diplomatic channels? Then again, it looks
like the FBI
14 matches
Mail list logo
