Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake

2024-02-19 Thread Tim Howe
Some responses below. On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:01:06 -0800 William Herrin wrote: > > I've never once seen a device > > that has v6 support and didn't have a stateful v6 firewall on by > > default (if v6 was "on"). > > Acknowledged. > > So when the user wants to run a home server, their IPv4

Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake

2024-02-19 Thread Tim Howe
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:16:00 -0800 William Herrin wrote: > I disagree with that one. Limiting discussion to the original security > context (rather than the wider world of how useful IPv6 is without > IPv4), IPv6 is typically delivered to "most people" without border > security, while IPv4 is

Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4

2024-02-15 Thread Tim Howe
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:25:03 -0800 Stephen Satchell wrote: > On 2/14/24 4:23 PM, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > The best option is what is happening right now: you can’t get new IPv4 > > addresses, so you have to either buy them, or use IPv6. The free market > > is solving the problem right now.

Re: The Reg does 240/4

2024-02-13 Thread Tim Howe
mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Routing+Protocol+Overview > > Ping across? Sure. Ok. But I wouldn't rely on it for anything critical. > > Caveat emptor. > > > On 2/13/24 18:43, Tim Howe wrote: > > So, just FYI, we just tested a /31 on Eth1 of the L009 and it &g

Re: The Reg does 240/4

2024-02-13 Thread Tim Howe
So, just FYI, we just tested a /31 on Eth1 of the L009 and it seems to work fine(?) --TimH On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:04:50 -0800 Tim Howe wrote: > That's very disappointing. > > I acquired a Mikrotik L009 router to play with recently, and it's been one > let-down after

Re: The Reg does 240/4

2024-02-13 Thread Tim Howe
That's very disappointing. I acquired a Mikrotik L009 router to play with recently, and it's been one let-down after another; now this. --TimH On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:04:45 +0100 Bryan Holloway wrote: > Let me know when they support /31s. > > > On 2/13/24 08:07, Dave Taht wrote: > > And

Re: BendTel ASN27008 moving router tonight

2022-08-30 Thread Tim Howe
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:37:40 -0700 Tim Howe wrote: > Between 9 and 11pm tonight our colo provider must move our router to a > new rack. > I'll shut down bgp a bit after 9pm and then restore once I verify the > router is back up correctly and interfaces are normalized. >

BendTel ASN27008 moving router tonight

2022-08-30 Thread Tim Howe
Between 9 and 11pm tonight our colo provider must move our router to a new rack. I'll shut down bgp a bit after 9pm and then restore once I verify the router is back up correctly and interfaces are normalized. -- Tim Howe ti...@bendtel.com Data Processing541-389-8252 BendTel

Re: V6 still not supported

2022-03-09 Thread Tim Howe
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:56 -0500 Josh Luthman wrote: > ISP here. Deploying gigabit FTTH. No IPv6. > > Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006. Right. And this view point (which I have /some/ sympathy for) is what we're up against. The average person doesn't know

Re: V6 still not supported (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)

2022-03-09 Thread Tim Howe
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:46:41 -0800 David Conrad wrote: > Tim, > > On Mar 9, 2022, at 9:09 AM, Tim Howe wrote: > > Some of our biggest vendors who have supposedly supported > > v6 for over a decade have rudimentary, show-stopping bugs. > > Not disagreeing (and not p

Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)

2022-03-09 Thread Tim Howe
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:22:49 -0500 Tom Beecher wrote: > > It doesn't take any OS upgrades for "getting everything to work on > > IPv6". All the OS's and routers have supported IPv6 for more than a > > decade. > > > > There are lots of vendors, both inside and outside the networking space, >

Re: Fiber Network Equipment Commercial Norms

2021-09-22 Thread Tim Howe
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:47:32 -0500 wrote: > Whatever it is, the owner comes running when the local maintenance > apprentice unplugs it…. He tells me they show up within 30-45 minutes. We've attempted to address this problem by having plastic tags on the power cords that basically say

Re: Fiber Network Equipment Commercial Norms

2021-09-22 Thread Tim Howe
Forgive the top post... This issue /can/ be complicated, but I have some direct experience with a lot of variations on this. It sounds like this particular situation might involve equipment that is part of a Metro ring. This is pretty nice because it might mean there is

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

2021-09-18 Thread Tim Howe
Also, I realise I'm kinda taking your comment out of context and jumping on it to harp on my favorite pet peeve, so, yeah, sorry about that. --TimH On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:28:02 -0700 Tim Howe wrote: > On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 21:15:00 -0700 > Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > &

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

2021-09-18 Thread Tim Howe
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 21:15:00 -0700 Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > Unless their infrastructure runs significantly on hardware and > software pre-2004 (unlikely), so does the cost of adding IPv6 to > their content servers. Especially if they’re using a CDN such as > Akamai. Owen, I have

Re: DDoS attack with blackmail

2021-05-20 Thread Tim Howe
I would encourage you to contact the FBI. Another ISP told me a fairly positive story after being in the same situation. --TimH On Thu, 20 May 2021 21:26:50 +0200 Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Hello > > We got attacked by a group that calls themselves "Fancy Lazarus". They want > payment in BC to

Re: DoD IP Space

2021-02-11 Thread Tim Howe
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:05:51 +1100 Mark Andrews wrote: > Almost everything you buy today works with IPv6. Even the crappy $50 home > router does IPv6. You're testing very different gear than I am. I have not found this to be true, and I look harder than most. I put every new

Re: VDSL

2019-10-15 Thread Tim Howe
ury buildings with courtyards. I have seen lots of > activity on this street - fiber being pulled from manhole and gear being > installed in cable manholes. Corning on the cables. > > Regards, > > Roderick. > > > From: NANOG on behalf o

Re: VDSL

2019-10-15 Thread Tim Howe
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:24:44 + Rod Beck wrote: > Hi, > > I discovered that the Budapest cable company was using VDLS to > provide services up to 500 megs into the buildings where my flats are > located. VDSL is a pretty old standard. I recollect people talking > about it back in 1998. > >

Re: Ookla geo IP data contact?

2019-08-08 Thread Tim Howe
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:35:09 -0700 TJ Trout wrote: > Has anyone had success with getting Ookla / Maxmind to update subnets whois > data? I've submitted the correction request with Maxmind ten times over the > last 5 years and all of our resources still show the previous allocation > owner as the

Removing defunct IRR records from LEVEL3 rr

2019-08-02 Thread Tim Howe
Has anyone successfully gotten Level3/Centurylink to remove defunct IRR objects? All paths seem to lead to trying to get me to log into a customer portal. If they have incorrect objects for IP resources I control, how am I supposed to get them cleaned up if I am not a customer? --TimH

Re: Reddit down

2019-07-11 Thread Tim Howe
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:01:36 -0400 Robert Webb wrote: > Sorry for the noise... > > From my end it appears to be browser related. > > Accessing from Chrome fails but works without issue on Edge.. > I'm also finding that it works with Chrome but I'm getting the "Our CDN was unable to

Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard?

2019-05-17 Thread Tim Howe
On Tue, 14 May 2019 22:27:09 -0400 Brandon Martin wrote: > Is there a standard that defines/recommends behavior for route injection > of snooped DHCPv6-PD (or IA, I guess) assignments on routers running > relay agents? That is, snooping or otherwise examining a relayed DHCPv6 > response for

Re: Comcast email filtering broken?

2018-07-13 Thread Tim Howe
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:35:21 -0700 Tim Howe wrote: > If someone from Comcast who is smarter than their automated email stuff > could contact me off list, that would be cool. There appears to be > some kind of internal disconnect. Just FYI, I got a quick response and this is

Comcast email filtering broken?

2018-07-12 Thread Tim Howe
If someone from Comcast who is smarter than their automated email stuff could contact me off list, that would be cool. There appears to be some kind of internal disconnect. --TimH

Re: students questions

2016-07-25 Thread Tim Howe
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:11:29 -0700 "sam" wrote: > [...] > 1. Are there any email providers that market to professional but offer > a student rate or are of good quality but inexpensive etc.. > [...] FastMail might fit the bill. Not free, but pretty

Re: AT (SBC Global) email admins?

2015-12-17 Thread Tim Howe
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:55:46 -0800 Tim Howe <ti...@bendtel.com> wrote: > [...] > Could someone contact me privately and clue me in as to who can > be contacted to clear an old blacklist entry? > > --TimH FYI, I got resolution off-list. Thanks! --TimH

AT (SBC Global) email admins?

2015-12-15 Thread Tim Howe
I hate going this route, but repeated attempts at all other avenues have been exhausted. We have a customer IP that has been blocked from sending email to SBC Global addresses since day one. The options AT has presented for dealing with this clearly have no effect or simply don't work

Re: high latency on West Coast?

2015-09-18 Thread Tim Howe
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:50:23 -0700 Florin Andrei wrote: > I'm seeing 250 ms between California and Oregon. Not just AWS, but also > between, say, Comcast and AWS. > > Latency from other locations, such as between N. Virginia and Oregon, is > much lower, about 72 ms in

Re: Phasing out of copper

2014-11-28 Thread Tim Howe
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:46:03 -0500 Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote: For my reply I am trying to get more authoritative info to show that incumbents do have plans to retire the copper plant once enough customers have migrated to FTTP ( I heard that 80% migration is the

Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?

2014-11-01 Thread Tim Howe
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:30:06 +0900 Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: So who do we ask about making IRRs expire defunct objects you might start with a rigorous definition of defunct I can come up with a number of examples, but the ones that concern me the most are route objects where

Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?

2014-11-01 Thread Tim Howe
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:51:59 -0500 Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: [snip] People tend to treat things like IRR (eg: RADB, etc) as a garbage pit you toss things into and never remove from. So who do we

Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?

2014-10-31 Thread Tim Howe
In the recent past, we've had another provider in our same market erroneously advertising prefixes for some of our customers. After we got it cleared up, I noticed that there were some old route objects in RADB that were entered for that provider years ago by 360. These route objects, in

Comcast routes seen from the cheap seats

2010-12-17 Thread Tim Howe
I apologize in advance if this information is uninteresting. Since there was talk about Comcast I thought I might share what I have been looking at for the last couple weeks with how I see Comcast route announcements from my network. On November 22nd (early morning US/Pacific time) we noticed a

Re: Comcast routes seen from the cheap seats

2010-12-17 Thread Tim Howe
with. Thanks, Tony (speaking on behalf of AS7922) Thanks for responding, Tony. I will do that. -- Tim Howe ti...@bendtel.com Data Processing541-389-8252 BendTelGPG pubkey id: 302D210B