On 12/31/2014 6:08 AM, Marcin Kurek wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a high-end processor with maximum memory
On 12/28/2014 5:02 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
3. authentication and authorization caching and/or something else
Is this related to the TACACS server being down and the long time out to
hit local authen/author? Sorry, a little late to this party :)
tv
On 11/28/2013 11:37 PM, Jawaid Desktop wrote:
We're a service provider, and we have a network full of Cat6509's. We
are finding that we are outgrowing them from the standpoint of their
ability to handle lots of large routing tables. Obviously their
switching capability is still superb but one
On 12/29/2011 9:06 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
(you forgot to change subj:)
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrnecb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support
mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center.
yes,
On 9/12/2011 3:12 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
In your typical enterprise environment, a 1G DoS will zorch the link long
before it zorches the router at the enterprise side.
This contradicts my experience - I've repeatedly witnessed only a few
On 6/2/2011 7:08 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
Worldanything day is a sure-shot bet win at an anti-climax, and an industry
failure and waste of investment and publicity campaign.
Andrew
I've had more customers ask and now willing to participate than ever before.
Any better suggestions? Or,
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:10:16PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:
To be fair to Cisco and maybe I'm way off here. But it
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Kim brandon@brandontek.com
To: c...@wpi.edu; nanog group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
For ISL, I know they are trying to phase that out. For the exams, they are
- Original Message -
From: gordon b slater gordsla...@ieee.org
To: Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:50 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
somebody said
- Original Message -
From: Dylan Ebner dylan.eb...@crlmed.com
To: srg srgqwe...@gmail.com; nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: BGP support on ASA5585-X
IMHO, I don't think this is a marketing issue for cisco. It's a design
issue. PIX/ASA is good at
- Original Message -
From: khatfi...@socllc.net
To: Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
They could make it out of the box but this is why Dylan made his statement.
His statement is far
- Original Message -
From: Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net
To: Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,
On one hand, we all recognize oversubscription as an issue.
Of course the high level of oversub is an issue
We'll disagree then. Oversub makes access affordable.
..with the scary boogeyman of evil illegal P2P filesharing
That just tips the money in the wrong direction. And it's a real threat
(amongst others)...not just that deadly clown
- Original Message -
From: Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net
To: Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Vyatta as a BRAS
On Jul 14, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
The truth is that you can keep throwing
Original Message -
From: Bill Stewart nonobvi...@gmail.com
To: Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet
That's the spec sheet, and that's for straight forwarding.
If you want to do much
Cisco rates it at 256mbps which places it above a NPE-400.
The 3825 says 179mbps on their spec sheet. Not sure where you are getting
your numbers but they are way off.
All of those numbers are straight forwarding with nothing turned on and 64
byte packets. That way you get a nice idea of
Why would you migrate them away instead of buying a $150/$250 one-time
license?
tv
- Original Message -
From: Blomberg, Orin P (DOH) orin.blomb...@doh.wa.gov
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
Thanks for the information. I am
- Original Message -
From: Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update
Can anyone recommend a decent book on IPV6? Most of what I find on the
net don't explain things very well.
thanks,
Curtis
Residential computers with enough bandwidth to DoS
hosting providers; that should be fun. Maybe it will
encourage the incumbant ISP's to start offering users
meaningful bgp communities since they won't be able
to keep up with the abuse reports.
David
That's already here today.
tv
Would you mind passing along a source/link on the 15kpps? I haven't seen
that number yet.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
To: Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: lawful
- Original Message -
From: Tom Sands tsa...@rackspace.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: DDoS mitigation recommendations
-Original Message-
From: David Freedman [mailto:david.freed...@uk.clara.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010
- Original Message -
From: John Jason Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
To: Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Thanks.
Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target
That's a vendor specific issue. Maybe you could take it up with them and
ask what year they think this is?
tv
- Original Message -
From: Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de
To: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
Cc: nanOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:06 AM
Shouldn't be any issues...it's 2010 :)
And, your IP allocation utilization will love you.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
To: nanOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:08 PM
Subject: Using /31 for router links
In the past I've always
Would it be possible to string along and coordinate with the appropriate law
enforcement entity?
tv
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Pasker i...@n-connect.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:04 PM
Subject: just...wow.
I got this email inquiring about data
LOL! That was purty good and mostly true.
Well, I was thinking from the standpoint of 1) They are going somewhere,
maybe not you 2) breaking law(s) 3) someone has to intervene, eventually.
You could apply the above to any crime really. And they essentially told
you they are going to commit
As a side note that many may be aware of, there are other Cisco
products/code bases that have these nice features.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Paul Cosgrove paul.cosgrove.na...@gmail.com
To: Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 18,
The answer is fairly simple. Does your business benefit by having the
ability to modify routing strategy as you see fit?
Yes or no?
IMO, the answer is yes. If your business partners aren't on the same page
or align correctly with your requirements, seek new ones.
tv
- Original Message
Core typically references functionality, not the number of network devices
at that layer.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
To: Bailey Stephen stephen.bai...@uk.fujitsu.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco
That isn't always true. Some switches are already speced as full. It's
best to read the product docs or speak with a rep to be sure.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Eric Gearhart e...@nixwizard.net
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:51 AM
Subject: Re:
E has a significant presence in Chicago so don't leave us out. :)
tv
- Original Message -
From: Simon Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Konstantin Bezruchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: North American Network Operators Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 7:47 AM
Subject:
Any chance this will be captured (maybe professionally via HD:)?
Unfortunately I cannot be there but would really appreciate being in the
audience.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Rodney Joffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
Yup. You can horde.
You can easily justify a /23 these days and not be multihomed still get a
/22.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Pete Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tony Varriale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [NANOG
AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore.
Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William Herrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [NANOG] Multihoming
34 matches
Mail list logo
