On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated).
Have you tried CERT-BR? Uh... I was about to say they're usually very
Hi!
We were hijacked aswell, by 27664 16735
Our affected prefixes were:
94.46.0.0/16
194.88.142.0/23
194.11.23.0/24
82.102.0.0/18
195.246.238.0/23
194.107.127.0/24
81.92.192.0/19
193.227.238.0/23
We are trying to contact them in order to get some feedback, and some
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
Problem resolved?
https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php
Check out the TITLE of the document. Me thinks it was a
rush job to post up the page and a bit of cut/paste was done. ;)
Tuc
Vixie, Conrad, Manning, Woodcock, Curran, Plzak, Ed Lewis, etc all
worked together at ARIN, and have had 22 ARIN employees attend NANOG,
including the ARIN executive secretary. ARIN is giving NANOG $50,000
checks, even though the Board members have undisclosed conflicts of
interest. ARIN
Vixie, Conrad, Manning, Woodcock, Curran, Plzak, Ed Lewis, etc all
worked together at ARIN, and have had 22 ARIN employees attend NANOG,
including the ARIN executive secretary. ARIN is giving NANOG $50,000
checks, even though the Board members have undisclosed conflicts of
interest.
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Personally, I think only a self-owned DC could get that low. A
general purpose DC would have too many inefficiencies since someone
like Equinix must have randomly sized cages, routers and servers,
custom-built suites, etc. By owning
Hi,
I hate to use NANOG for outages... But can anyone else get to
puck.nether.net or the outages.org list? A traceroute gets me into
Chicago with NTT and then dies...(Along with high ping times between
NY and IL for NTT)
I'm looking to see if anyone has more info about an SD
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com can't resolve it, either.
Sorry, I should have mentioned that.
Tuc/TBOH
Hi,
So far with 2 test messages, neither have been delivered. It also
does claim it leaves your IP in the email so there IS some tracking
approximately where it came from. I can't verify, of course, since 2 messages
have gone into never never land for me. Doesn't look like it ever got
Jorge Amodio wrote:
/etc/hosts rulez !!! :-)
Wonder if SRI wstill has the files.
Using the methods in RFC-952 and RFC-953 I wasn't able
to get them. I can't find if there is an updated RFC/name to use.
Tuc/TBOH ;)
Hi,
Not sure if anyone has seen yet, but there is a 2nd
exploit being circulated. I just picked it up on metasploits
SVN trunk
The first was called baliwicked_host, and the
description was :
This exploit attacks a fairly ubiquitous flaw in DNS implementations which
Dan
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- -- Robert D. Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, there is an exploit for it.
http://www.caughq.org/exploits/CAU-EX-2008-0002.txt
Now also (mirrored) here:
http://www.milw0rm.com
Now, there is an exploit for it.
http://www.caughq.org/exploits/CAU-EX-2008-0002.txt
For anyone looking to use it, you MUST update the frameworks
libraries. Some of the code only came out ~5 hours ago that
it needs.
Tuc/TBOH
- -- Robert D. Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, there is an exploit for it.
http://www.caughq.org/exploits/CAU-EX-2008-0002.txt
Now also (mirrored) here:
http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/6122
...and probably a slew of other places, too. ;-)
The changes the put into
Reading through the JavaScript that drives http://www.doxpara.com/,
it appears to be pretty easy to write a non-AJAX client to query Dan's
service. I threw one together in perl, named noclicky, that allows you
to use Dan's service against any nameserver specified on the command line.
You can
This requires serious elaboration. How could you use a domain in
.exe to actually attack someone? (No handwaving, please, actual
study.)
I think it would be the other way around - I would assume that that
was a near worthless TLD, as it
would come with a built in DOS : If I had
You do have a choice if you're not concerned about the deliverability of
your e-mail. Remember, the Internet remains a group of service
providers/organizations/subscribers that voluntarily work together and can
choose what goes in or out. And so if they decide not to receive traffic
from
Two years ago I posed the question here about the need for TLDs
(http://www.mcabee.org/lists/nanog/May-06/msg00110.html).
This all should have been solved by allowing those who
wanted/applied for TLDs to be granted them back in 1995 when
originally requested :
Once upon a time, Ken Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Oooh -- dibs on that one. And .some, so you can register awe.some,
trouble.some, and fear.some. And .ous, which would allow humm.ous,
seri.ous, fabul.ous, etc..
Somebody on /. mentioned .dot, so you could tell someone to go to:
Maybe they should buy time on their own EC2 if they are short of webservers. :)
The staus page http://status.aws.amazon.com/ shows them Green and Clean
Tuc
I've no idea what Amazon uses for Load Balancers, but I'm pretty sure
that error message is the default error
NYC is so large and interesing that I wouldn't spend much time chasing
food. You're in foodie heaven. See the Statute of Liberty, the 9/11
memorial, Empire State Building, ride the subway, go to Hoboken, or
catch a glimpse of the UN. All great sites. Personally, I'd like to
find a karaoke bar
Hi,
Another case of getting much better help via NANOG than through a NOC.
Turns out there was an issue, and it subsequently was fixed in a
relatively small timeframe. Atleast a /20 of RR was not visible inside of L3,
I'm not sure if it was more.
Thanks again to those
Hi,
Sorry, would have posted this elsewhere, but I can't get
to alot of places...
I originally started chasing not being able to get to
71.74.56.243 (RR Mail server). I then found out neither L3 nor
my other connection saw it in the table. I checked a few other
router servers,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, would have posted this elsewhere, but I can't get
to alot of places...
I originally started chasing not being able to get to
71.74.56.243 (RR Mail server). I then found out
The official spokespeople don't mention it, but there is also a tendency
for local officials to divert fuel delivery trucks for their use instead
of maintaining communication facilities.
Perhaps a company will get in the business of labeling trucks that
normally say fuel to
On May 27, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Jerry Dixon wrote:
Jared nailed it on the head. It is absolutely critical to get to
know who
your State JFO POC is, State EOC POC, and have the National
Communication
Systems Hotline on speed dial or at least in your cell. They can help
Hi,
I was wondering if someone was running a single repository of
lists run by either Colo sites, or others in support of colo sites,
in the North America. (Like for 25 Broadway {Adam?}, or even more
specifically 118th, 5th floor, room 518 and anyone that might be in
that room in the
27 matches
Mail list logo
