. The committee decided to
extend the last-call period for another two weeks to give ample chance to
further feedback.
So, it is not late for more comments,
Yardiel Fuentes
On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Yardiel D. Fuentes wrote:
Hello NANOGers,
Following up on the below effort from last year
Hello NANOGers,
The NANOG BCOP committee is currently considering strategies on how to best
create a numbering scheme for the BCOP appeals. As we all know, most public
technical references (IETF, etc) have numbers to clarify references. The goal
is for NANOG BCOPs to follow some sort of
, Yardiel D. Fuentes wrote:
OK NANOGers,
Some of us got the call to arms from Chris G email below and the NANOG BCOP
Committee and now we are interested in generating DoS attack-related Best
Common Practices (BCOP) appeal to serve the entire NANOG community.
This document, as other BCOP
Another DDoS/DoS email thread in progress, ah?... these seem to occur often
lately...
SoPerfect timing to remind all in the list that there is a NANOG BCOP in
the works on this topic.
Some of us have been working on documenting our collective knowledge about real
practices that
can help
OK NANOGers,
Some of us got the call to arms from Chris G email below and the NANOG BCOP
Committee and now we are interested in generating DoS attack-related Best
Common Practices (BCOP) appeal to serve the entire NANOG community.
This document, as other BCOP appeals are expected to be as
5 matches
Mail list logo