Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Right now there are about 15k routes.
8k when you filter based on IRR.
--
//fredan
The Last Mile Cache - http://tlmc.fredan.se
Just to clarify, Patrick is right here.
Assumptions:
All the movies is 120 minuters long. Each movie has an average bitrate
of 50 Mbit/s.
(50 Mbit/s / 8 (bits) * 7 200 (2 hours) / 1000 (MB) = 45 GB).
That means that the storage capacity for the movies is going to be:
10 000 000 * 45 (GB)
And if you don't have said awesome software, then how do you propose to
limit the bandwidth need for the cache so you aren't burning more bandwidth
than your hit rate, which is what everyone is trying to ask you (or more
accurately, explain to you)?
Without the concept of TLMC, I don't know.
I
These technologies are being unified by DASH in the MPEG/ISO standards bodies.
Then we have to hope that we will see this implemented in
Traffic Server, Squid, Varnish, so that everybody can benefit
from this.
--
//fredan
The Last Mile Cache - http://tlmc.fredan.se
Others think that load-balancing 150+ rooms with Fast Ethernet and
WiFi in every room, plus a couple of conference/meeting rooms (e.g.
potentially more than a single /24 worth of all sorts of devices) on a
couple of independent T1 and ADSL links is an acceptable practice.
Yes, a T1 and an ADSL,
Not to be pedantic, but The Last Mile Cache will actually help you to
solve this problem, with a local cache server at the hotel.
The hotel's ISP must participate in TLMC before they, the hotel, can
have a cache server running.
And as a business traveller I want to have the ISP or Hotel
You seem to be mistaken that any bandwidth issue will be remedied by
TLMC. A significant number (well over the 50% mark I'd wager) will not
be remedied. This thread was started over such a subject.
And to save 1 - 5 Mbit/s of this bandwidth is wrong, how?
The Apple TV cited as an example was
*Now* I understand the problem.
Do you really think that the content providers, and the delivery systems
they purposefully choose for that, actually make that possible, much less
practical?
(I'm not sure that I understand what you mean with that sentence).
If you mean that a CSP already has
How about buy the movies in question, convert them to MP4, install a media
server on a local box and configure Xbox, tablet, smart-phone, whatever to
access the media server?
No. Streaming from services, like Netflix, HBO, etc..., is what's
coming. We need to prepare for the bandwidth they
But it has become unclear what your fundamental premise and argument are,
by this point in the game.
See the subject of this thread?
Is it: it is bad that content providers choose a business and technical
model wherein local in-home transparent caching proxies won't work?
No, it's not.
--
- Well, as it turns out, we don't have that kind of a problem.
- You don't?
- No, we do not have that kind of a problem in our network.
We have plenty of bandwidth available to our customers,
thank-you-every-much.
- Do you have, just to make an example, about 10 000 customers
in a
A movie is static. The content does not change despite how many times
you watch it.
Multicast
Can be useful for live events, like news or sports. I give you that.
--
//fredan
to watch the latest Quad-HD movie
Multicast
-I'm afraid it has to be unicast so that people can pause/resume anytime
they need to go... well you know what I mean
Works fine too with multicast, for instance with FuzzyCast:
https://marcel.wanda.ch/Fuzzycast/
(I did notice that this was
You really think people did not have problems with the 1mbit links they
had back then?
Yes, I do.
And you really think that we won't have problems with
Zillion-HD or whatever they will call it in another 20 years?
I think that this is something I'm trying to say, with the creation of
this
The media market has fragmented, so unless we're talking about the first
week in February in the US it's not all from one source or 3 or 5.
Explain further. I did not get that.
So far the most common delivery format for quad HD content online rings
in at around 20Mb/s so you're not
I do have an suggestion for how to solve this. See my message yesterday
to the mailing list.
Ah, I get it, you are trying to get people to acknowledge the
non-existence of your tool that does what every transparent HTTP proxy
has been doing for years! ;)
Where exactly do you put those
My understanding is there is no appreciable amount of QHD programming
available to watch anyway, and certainly nothing a) in English b) that
isn't sports.
Why wouldn't you like to solve the problem before it can happen?
(I'm talk about static content here, not live events).
--
//fredan
How does Akamai or Limelight or any other CDN, allow your customers as
an ISP to cache the content at their home, in their own cache server?
Again: Akamai. See also Limelight, etc...
fredrik danerklint fredan-na...@fredan.se wrote:
My understanding is there is no appreciable amount of QHD
About 40 - 50 Mbit/s. Not bad at all.
Downloading software does not have to be in real-time, like watching
a movie, does.
In both cases it's actually rather convenient if it's as fast as
possible,
Yes. What I would like to have is to allow the access switch, which a
customer for an ISP is
allow my customers as an ISP to cache the content at their home.
Do you *mean* their home -- an end-user residence?
Yes, I do *mean* that.
As in you, Jay, should be allowed to run your own cache server in your
home (Traffic Server is the one that I'm using in the TLMC concept).
Wouldn't you
When I did post the following, I did not, as it turns out, have good
documentation of how TLMC actually works.
I do hope that what I've done during these days, can describe TLMC
better than the current website can.
So there is a file called 'document packages' on the site right now.
Does anybody know of any other CDN providers that offer similar caches?
Yes.
The Last Mile Cache.
http://tlmc.fredan.se
It's an completely open solution for everybody, both the ISP (Internet
Service Provider) and CSP (Content Service Provider).
--
//fredan
From the article:
Faced with the shortage of IPv4 addresses and the failure of IPv6 to
take off, British ISP PlusNet is testing carrier-grade network address
translation CG-NAT, where potentially all the ISP's customers could be
sharing one IP address, through a gateway. The move is
I would hope that PlusNet has valid, well-thought-out reasons for deploying
CGN instead of IPv6. Not knowing those, I can only jugde their position on
its face: foolish and short-sighted.
Move along, nothing to see here. Barring a few fanatics, everyone here
has known for several years now
Even tough you have very good arguments, my suggestion would be to have a
class A network (I got that right, right?) for all the users and only having
6rd as service on that network.
ARIN and IETF cooperated last year to allocate 100.64.0.0/10 for CGN
use. See RFC 6598. This makes it possible
If we are gonna start to get somewhere with this issue, how about to
make sure the routing/prefix databases is correct first?
Please see:
https://www.fredan.se/temp/prefixes.tar
In that file you will find 'not_allowed_to_announce6' which contains
about 2307 prefixes of ipv6 which is not in any
I like thisone!
As I recall, their scheme went something like:
invoice_amount = some_constant * (quantity)^0.75
--
//fredan
The days of public-facing software-based routers were over years ago - you
need an ASIC-based edge router, else you'll end up getting zorched.
wait, what?
--
//fredan
How about a TXT record with the CN string of the CA cert subject in
it? If it exists and there's a conflict, don't trust it. Seems
simple enough to implement without too much collateral damage.
Needs to be a DNSSEC-validated TXT record, or you've opened yourself up
to
How about that one?
(Please reply to the mailing list only)
--
//fredan
Well, that's another problem.
To make a long story short, the network (not mine and I don't have any kind of
control over that either) that my customers (including me) are using, did put
in new equipment (a switch) over a year ago and after that I lost my IPv6
connection that I had previously.
/index.php/Broadband_CPE#DSL). All the DSL modem
vendors could stand improving their GUI.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: fredrik danerklint [mailto:fredan-na...@fredan.se]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 7:27 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3 any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; WARNING:
at 5:04 PM, fredrik danerklint
fredan-na...@fredan.sewrote:
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3 any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
The problem is not all on Microsoft at this case.
For example; I've bought a ZyXEL P-2612HNU-F1(which has
802.11n Wireless ADSL 2+ 4-port gateway 2 SIP 2 USB 3G Backup)
in december 2010. It basiclly has everything in it.
How do I as a customer do to have a working IPv6 setup on this modem since
records again.
--
//Fredrik Danerklint
//Fredan
36 matches
Mail list logo
