Nanog,
At my organization we historically would get T1 ISPs at our POPs and take full
table + default. BGP would simply "do it's thing" and for the most part
everything worked out. There are instances where we have had heavily lopsided
traffic even though AS path length is the same.
To make
our manual updates in the future is higher, but still low.
> Most of those things are automated.
Thank you.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, April 23, 2021 11:11 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore
wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2021, at 7:58 PM, nanoguser100 vi
* Do I run the risk of being blacklisted for this practice?
-Nanoguser100
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, April 21, 2021 9:00 AM, nanoguser100 via NANOG
wrote:
> I wanted to get the communities' opinion on this.
>
&
William,
The plan is to carve out a /24 for "Estonia" and have special servers on it.
This would be the same /24 I'd have to use if I were to put a legitimate POP
there. This also means I don't conflict with the real Germany.
I am just worried about violating the 'rules' of these providers
https://ipdata.co/corrections.html
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, April 21, 2021 5:32 PM, Brian wrote:
> Good day all. I am trying to find contacts at ipdata.co and ipinfo.io. I
> recently acquired new ip space and
I wanted to get the communities' opinion on this.
I am an admin for a quasi-ISP providing cloud hosted desktop solutions for end
users. We have POPs all around the world, own our own ASN, and advertise /24s
or /23s at each of our POPs fro our large aggregate. As an ISP we submit our
blocks to
6 matches
Mail list logo
