Have you looked at Google Voice much? I have mine set up to SMS all my
devices, including email delivery, and can enable/disable devices as
needed. The big benefit, is that I have an inbox full of all my old inbound
and outbound text messages.
It might be that I am missing a key element, but it
is keeping Google from releasing
the product to a broader audience, e.g. more countries than the US.
On Oct 9, 2012 3:25 PM, TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:47 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, steve pirk [egrep] st...@pirk.com
wrote
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA)
math...@hawaii.eduwrote:
It it is of interest...
https://www.change.org/petitions/from-educause-higher-ed-wireless-networking-admin-group
I was not aware of this limitation. Android and other Chrome devices do not
have issues like
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Dave Hart daveh...@gmail.com wrote:
We continue to investigate why these connections were timing out
during connect, rather than quickly determining that there was no
route to the unavailable hosts and failing quickly.
potential translation:
We continue to
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ryan Malayter malay...@gmail.com wrote:
Doing it the right way makes the cloud far less cost-effective and far
less agile. Once you get it all set up just so, change becomes very
difficult. All the monitoring and fail-over/fail-back operations are
generally
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Not entirely. Datacenters do go down, our best efforts to the contrary
notwithstanding. Amazon doesn't guarantee you redundancy on EC2, only
the tools to provide it yourself. 25% Amazon; 75% service provider
clients;
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 16:42, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
That part is ambiguous at the moment since Verisign has not released
details. Symantec has bought the SSL part of the business and claim that
the SSL acquired network is not compromised. Sounds like lots of
assumptions being
Y'all ragged on me because Google+ was only available to gmail users...
Well, now you can enable it for your users from the control panel on your
Google Apps domains...
Google Apps administrators can manually turn on
Google+http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=1631744
for
their
On Oct 24, 2011 7:55 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
You can even download it all and erase yourself
if
you want out.
Don't count on it. You may 'disappear' from public view, but that does
not necessarily mean the data is truely 'gone'.
Just about everything on Google pages is https these days, even search if
you enable it.
If anybody on this thread uses gmail com a you really ought to take a look
at google plus. Compare the way user privacy is the primary objective,
versus the share everything by default of facebook.
I cannot
be that I am off base.
On Oct 23, 2011 4:04 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
On 2011-10-23 19:43 , steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
Just about everything on Google pages is https these days, even
search if you enable
be that a Googler saw Lauren's
post and the debate has already started.
-steve
On Oct 23, 2011 4:04 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
On 2011-10-23 19:43 , steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
Just about everything on Google pages is https
Found this posting:
Blackberry down. Research in Motion (RIM) sent the following e-mail to all
clients:
To: All Blackberry Clients
Please be advised that Research in Motion (RIM) is experiencing world-wide
connectivity issues affecting email flow to and from all Blackberries.
RIM has not
other
CCTLDs.
Therefore, it was not internet wide, though I will admit that it did
cover most of the widely known gTLDs.
Owen
On Oct 7, 2011, at 4:45 PM, steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
It turns out it was an artificial limitation on Network Solution's
part.
Being the only registrar
I saw this in a post from Travis Wise of Google yesterday. Pretty cool for
those users who do not want to use their ISP's name servers, or just want to
have dns resolve quickly from anywhere in the world. In either case, I think
it is cool ;-]
http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/
Here is the
Wow, consider me educated on old news. LOL
I imagine it is new to many of the users on the new service they launched. I
completely forgot that Nanog would probably be the first to comment and
chime in when it first became available.
Thanks for the information. I will definitely research the CDN
:54:38 PM steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
I seem to recollect back the 1999 or 2000 times that I was unable to
register a domain name that was 24 characters long. Shortly after that, I
heard that the character limit had been increased to like 128 characters,
and we were able to register the name
It turns out it was an artificial limitation on Network Solution's part.
Being the only registrar at the time, it was pretty much internet wide at
that point, contrary to the RFC spec.
What was so funny was that someone got Internic/Network Solutions to up the
limit. Apparently just to save some
at 02:54:38PM -0700, steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
I seem to recollect back the 1999 or 2000 times that I was unable to
register a domain name that was 24 characters long. Shortly after that, I
heard that the character limit had been increased to like 128 characters,
and we were able to register
If you want to be able to ask Googlers directly on issues like this, you
might try Google+. I am trying to spam, it is just that they are all
available on there. Here is something Scoble posted the other day:
I just spent an hour talking with a Google exec about + and I came away
with a few
Is this spam? ;-]
I have been doing a lot of playing with Google Places and the new HotPot
user ranking/review product, and for once, you get an honest list of reviews
by local people.
Only Google account holders can post reviews in the by Google users
section. I believe they also have to have a
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:21, Jess Cohen j...@corenap.com wrote:
GOOGLE: Dark fiber is optical fiber infrastructure (cabling and repeaters)
that is currently in place but is not being used. Optical fiber conveys
information in the form of light pulses so the dark means no light pulses
are
22 matches
Mail list logo
