orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port
Randy is correct. In most cases, the two protocols are running co-incident
for a while so you can do your table validation and topology mapping and
then you turn off OSPF. For vendors that aren't capable of supporting ISIS,
this is a feature and not a bug.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Randy
A non-cut off version is here: http://sdrv.ms/MeQl1L
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Smith, Courtney
courtney_sm...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
I am having trouble view the slides for this morning's presentation by
Vijay Gill. It appears conversion from power point to a PDF cropped the
slides
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
I've posted my notes from the afternoon sessions, including
the lighting talks, at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2011.01.31-NANOG51-afternoon-notes.txt
for those are are following along remotely, or catching up
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jay R. Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/more-details-on-todays-outage/431441338919
Apparently, our surmise about Akamai notwithstanding, the problem was actually
internal to their app-specific caching
adam, stop muck raking. in general, I'd advocate spending less time on
mailing lists and focusing more on delivering great product.
/vijay
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Adam Rothschild
asr+nanog-futu...@latency.net wrote:
I've been trying to avoid this topic, though as one of few
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
nanog/sf approaches. will our illustrious leadership be sending out at
least the basics of a business plan long enough before the meeting that
we have time to treat it seriously as opposed to flying foils at the so
called
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
nanog/sf approaches. will our illustrious leadership be sending out
at least the basics of a business plan long enough before the meeting
that we have time to treat it seriously as opposed to flying foils at
the so called
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote:
Randy Bush expunged (ra...@psg.com):
thanks steve. this is certainly a step forward in nanog's evolution,
and one i hope and presume will be positive. hard work for you, but
really it's mostly just business. we did it with
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote:
vijay gill expunged (vg...@vijaygill.com):
I'll second that. I'll admit to my jaw dropping when I read the
announcement, but I think it's the direction we need to go (and maybe even
long overdue). Merit has done a great
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote:
vijay gill expunged (vg...@vijaygill.com):
What were some specific issues.
It's not my intention to re-hash that last four years of community meetings
(maybe you some show up more frequently?) :)
I have been to a few
If you are unfortunate enough to have to peer at a public exchange
point, put your public ports into a vrf that has your routes. Default
will be suboptimal to debug.
I must say stephen and vixie and (how hard this is to type) even
richard steenbergens methodology makes the most sense going
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Marshall Eubanks t...@multicasttech.comwrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of Permission Denied to
/interstitial?... URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as This site may
This is probably going to be a somewhat unpopular opinion, mostly
because people cannot figure out their COGS. If you can get transit
for cheaper than your COGS, you are better off buying transit and not
peering. There are some small arguments to be made for latency and
'cheap/free' peering if
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 10:19 PM, vijay gill wrote:
This is probably going to be a somewhat unpopular opinion, mostly
because people cannot figure out their COGS. If you can get transit
for cheaper than your COGS, you
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:05 AM, vijay gill wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 10:19 PM, vijay gill wrote:
This is probably going to be a somewhat
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let this be a vote for *no* on shutting off net access.
It's not really an either/or situation. There are ways to
have both, and, as we both pointed out, there are good reasons
why speakers should not assume that room full of
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, vijay gill wrote:
In short, instead of coercive action, how about the presenters learn to
be
more relevant, interesting, or fun
Can anyone confirm _from the field_, a partition between telia 1299 and
cogentco 174?
I have trouble tickets numbers, but I want to hear if anyone is actually
affected by this.
/vijay
On 2/24/08, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 4:19 AM, vijay gill wrote:
I would like the voice my support for the peering bof, it is by far
the most entertaining item at nanog. You cannot see this much level
of fail in one place, and for this reason alone
On 2/24/08, Chris Malayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings All,
What's the deal with the Peering BOF for NY? I've heard rumors running
wild
that we're not going to have one, we're going to have one but Bill isn't
going
to run it, to we're moving to a peering track and a track bases
On 12/3/07, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the second time someone from the Program Committee has posted
something that seemed to be asking for something to help our success
or informing people about standard (revenue generating even) functions
of NANOG and that they believe
On 8/10/07, John Paul Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yet people still say the sky is falling with respect to routing
convergence and FIB size. Probably a better comparison BTW, would be with a
Nintendo or Playstation, as they are MIPS and PowerPC based. Even the latest
route
23 matches
Mail list logo
