In case you missed it, Jari Arkko, Chair of the IETF and Stephen
Farrell, IETF Security Area Director, just posted:
http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/09/security-and-pervasive-monitoring/
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
: [Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on BULLRUN
On 09/07/2013 05:03 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Good theory only the CA industry tried very hard to deploy and was prevented
from doing so because Randy Bush abused his position as DNSEXT chair to prevent
modification of the spec to meet
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com
Cc: cryptogra...@metzdowd.com cryptogra...@metzdowd.com, ianG
i...@iang.org
Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on BULLRUN
On 09/07/2013 05:03 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Good theory only the CA industry tried very hard to deploy
i...@iang.org
Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on BULLRUN
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 09:14:47PM +, Gregory Perry wrote:
And this is exactly why there is no real security
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
1. [...] In general the consuming public cannot tell the
difference between “good stuff” and snake oil. So when presented
with a $100 “good” solution or a $10 bunch of snake oil, guess
what gets bought.
Or
With regards to the 10$ snake oil security product versus the real one
at $100: since the NSA can break both, they are both worth worth $0 in
terms of privacy.
From a business/corporate point of view, there are two aspects:
1- Image: If your weak security has allowed a data breach to become
...@metzdowd.com, ianG
i...@iang.org
Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on BULLRUN
On 09/07/2013 05:03 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Good theory only the CA industry tried very hard to deploy and was prevented
from doing so because Randy Bush abused his position as DNSEXT chair
7 matches
Mail list logo
