On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 19:15, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
> But that doesn't prevent the other RIRs issuing those since all TAs sign 0/0.
That's an extremely dangerous precedent to set. It would eradicate the
trust in the RPKI system.
How about letting this legal issue play out in court and avoid any
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 18:45, Compton, Rich A wrote:
>
> Can't AfriNIC just create ROAs for the prefixes and point them to AS0?
Trying to resolve political, legal, financial, policy or other
non-technical problems with technical workarounds is a very flawed
idea. The world would be in a much
But that doesn't prevent the other RIRs issuing those since all TAs sign
0/0.
Rubens
Em sex, 27 de ago de 2021 13:56, Jay Hennigan escreveu:
> On 8/27/21 09:45, Compton, Rich A wrote:
> > Can't AfriNIC just create ROAs for the prefixes and point them to AS0?
> That would pretty much make the
* rich.comp...@charter.com (Compton, Rich A) [Fri 27 Aug 2021, 18:47 CEST]:
Can't AfriNIC just create ROAs for the prefixes and point them to
AS0? That would pretty much make the prefixes unusable since most
tier 1's are doing ROV now.
I'm not a lawyer but that doesn't strike me as a great
On 8/27/21 09:45, Compton, Rich A wrote:
Can't AfriNIC just create ROAs for the prefixes and point them to AS0? That
would pretty much make the prefixes unusable since most tier 1's are doing ROV
now.
Technically they can, but the whole situation is tied up in litigation
so legally they
Can't AfriNIC just create ROAs for the prefixes and point them to AS0? That
would pretty much make the prefixes unusable since most tier 1's are doing ROV
now.
-Rich
On 8/27/21, 10:20 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Aaron Wendel"
wrote:
CAUTION: The e-mail below is from an external source.
6 matches
Mail list logo
